Cargando…

Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of an internet intervention for low back pain (LBP) using three arms: (1) usual care, (2) usual care plus an internet intervention or (3) usual care plus an internet intervention with additional physiotherapist telephone suppor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geraghty, Adam W A, Stanford, Rosie, Stuart, Beth, Little, Paul, Roberts, Lisa C, Foster, Nadine E, Hill, Jonathan C, Hay, Elaine M, Turner, David, Malakan, Wansida, Leigh, Linda, Yardley, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016768
_version_ 1783311006832787456
author Geraghty, Adam W A
Stanford, Rosie
Stuart, Beth
Little, Paul
Roberts, Lisa C
Foster, Nadine E
Hill, Jonathan C
Hay, Elaine M
Turner, David
Malakan, Wansida
Leigh, Linda
Yardley, Lucy
author_facet Geraghty, Adam W A
Stanford, Rosie
Stuart, Beth
Little, Paul
Roberts, Lisa C
Foster, Nadine E
Hill, Jonathan C
Hay, Elaine M
Turner, David
Malakan, Wansida
Leigh, Linda
Yardley, Lucy
author_sort Geraghty, Adam W A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of an internet intervention for low back pain (LBP) using three arms: (1) usual care, (2) usual care plus an internet intervention or (3) usual care plus an internet intervention with additional physiotherapist telephone support. DESIGN AND SETTING: A three-armed randomised controlled feasibility trial conducted in 12 general practices in England. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care patients aged over 18 years, with current LBP, access to the internet and without indicators of serious spinal pathology or systemic illness. INTERVENTIONS: The ‘SupportBack’ internet intervention delivers a 6-week, tailored programme, focused on graded goal setting, self-monitoring and provision of tailored feedback to encourage physical activity. Additional physiotherapist telephone support consisted of three brief telephone calls over a 4-week period, to address any concerns and provide reassurance. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were the feasibility of the trial design including recruitment, adherence and retention at follow-up. Secondary descriptive and exploratory analyses were conducted on clinical outcomes including LBP-related disability at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: Primary outcomes: 87 patients with LBP were recruited (target 60–90) over 6 months, and there were 3 withdrawals. Adherence to the intervention was higher in the physiotherapist-supported arm, compared with the stand-alone internet intervention. Trial physiotherapists adhered to the support protocol. Overall follow-up rate on key clinical outcomes at 3 months follow-up was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of a future definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the SupportBack intervention in primary care patients with LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN31034004; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58794552018-04-03 Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack) Geraghty, Adam W A Stanford, Rosie Stuart, Beth Little, Paul Roberts, Lisa C Foster, Nadine E Hill, Jonathan C Hay, Elaine M Turner, David Malakan, Wansida Leigh, Linda Yardley, Lucy BMJ Open Rheumatology OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of an internet intervention for low back pain (LBP) using three arms: (1) usual care, (2) usual care plus an internet intervention or (3) usual care plus an internet intervention with additional physiotherapist telephone support. DESIGN AND SETTING: A three-armed randomised controlled feasibility trial conducted in 12 general practices in England. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care patients aged over 18 years, with current LBP, access to the internet and without indicators of serious spinal pathology or systemic illness. INTERVENTIONS: The ‘SupportBack’ internet intervention delivers a 6-week, tailored programme, focused on graded goal setting, self-monitoring and provision of tailored feedback to encourage physical activity. Additional physiotherapist telephone support consisted of three brief telephone calls over a 4-week period, to address any concerns and provide reassurance. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were the feasibility of the trial design including recruitment, adherence and retention at follow-up. Secondary descriptive and exploratory analyses were conducted on clinical outcomes including LBP-related disability at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: Primary outcomes: 87 patients with LBP were recruited (target 60–90) over 6 months, and there were 3 withdrawals. Adherence to the intervention was higher in the physiotherapist-supported arm, compared with the stand-alone internet intervention. Trial physiotherapists adhered to the support protocol. Overall follow-up rate on key clinical outcomes at 3 months follow-up was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of a future definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the SupportBack intervention in primary care patients with LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN31034004; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5879455/ /pubmed/29525768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016768 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Rheumatology
Geraghty, Adam W A
Stanford, Rosie
Stuart, Beth
Little, Paul
Roberts, Lisa C
Foster, Nadine E
Hill, Jonathan C
Hay, Elaine M
Turner, David
Malakan, Wansida
Leigh, Linda
Yardley, Lucy
Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)
title Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)
title_full Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)
title_fullStr Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)
title_full_unstemmed Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)
title_short Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack)
title_sort using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (supportback)
topic Rheumatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016768
work_keys_str_mv AT geraghtyadamwa usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT stanfordrosie usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT stuartbeth usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT littlepaul usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT robertslisac usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT fosternadinee usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT hilljonathanc usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT hayelainem usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT turnerdavid usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT malakanwansida usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT leighlinda usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback
AT yardleylucy usinganinternetinterventiontosupportselfmanagementoflowbackpaininprimarycarefindingsfromarandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialsupportback