Cargando…
Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: The ‘Engager’ programme is a ‘through-the-gate’ intervention designed to support prisoners with common mental health problems as they transition from prison back into the community. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Engager intervention. METHODS AND ANA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017931 |
_version_ | 1783311013537382400 |
---|---|
author | Kirkpatrick, Tim Lennox, Charlotte Taylor, Rod Anderson, Rob Maguire, Michael Haddad, Mark Michie, Susan Owens, Christabel Durcan, Graham Stirzaker, Alex Henley, William Stevenson, Caroline Carroll, Lauren Quinn, Cath Brand, Sarah Louise Harris, Tirril Stewart, Amy Todd, Roxanne Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Greer, Rebecca Pearson, Mark Shaw, Jenny Byng, Richard |
author_facet | Kirkpatrick, Tim Lennox, Charlotte Taylor, Rod Anderson, Rob Maguire, Michael Haddad, Mark Michie, Susan Owens, Christabel Durcan, Graham Stirzaker, Alex Henley, William Stevenson, Caroline Carroll, Lauren Quinn, Cath Brand, Sarah Louise Harris, Tirril Stewart, Amy Todd, Roxanne Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Greer, Rebecca Pearson, Mark Shaw, Jenny Byng, Richard |
author_sort | Kirkpatrick, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The ‘Engager’ programme is a ‘through-the-gate’ intervention designed to support prisoners with common mental health problems as they transition from prison back into the community. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Engager intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a parallel two-group randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to either: (a) the Engager intervention plus standard care (intervention group) or (b) standard care alone (control group) across two investigation centres (South West and North West of England). Two hundred and eighty prisoners meeting eligibility criteria will take part. Engager is a person-centred complex intervention delivered by practitioners and aimed at addressing offenders’ mental health and social care needs. It comprises one-to-one support for participants prior to release from prison and for up to 20 weeks postrelease. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure at 6 months postrelease. Secondary outcomes include: assessment of subjective met/unmet need, drug and alcohol use, health-related quality of life and well-being-related quality of life measured at 3, 6 and 12 months postrelease; change in objective social domains, drug and alcohol dependence, service utilisation and perceived helpfulness of services and change in psychological constructs related to desistence at 6 and 12 months postrelease; and recidivism at 12 months postrelease. A process evaluation will assess fidelity of intervention delivery, test hypothesised mechanisms of action and look for unintended consequences. An economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 (ref: 15/WA/0314) and the National Offender Management Service (ref: 2015–283). Findings will be disseminated to commissioners, clinicians and service users via papers and presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11707331; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5879493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58794932018-04-03 Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Kirkpatrick, Tim Lennox, Charlotte Taylor, Rod Anderson, Rob Maguire, Michael Haddad, Mark Michie, Susan Owens, Christabel Durcan, Graham Stirzaker, Alex Henley, William Stevenson, Caroline Carroll, Lauren Quinn, Cath Brand, Sarah Louise Harris, Tirril Stewart, Amy Todd, Roxanne Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Greer, Rebecca Pearson, Mark Shaw, Jenny Byng, Richard BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The ‘Engager’ programme is a ‘through-the-gate’ intervention designed to support prisoners with common mental health problems as they transition from prison back into the community. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Engager intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a parallel two-group randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to either: (a) the Engager intervention plus standard care (intervention group) or (b) standard care alone (control group) across two investigation centres (South West and North West of England). Two hundred and eighty prisoners meeting eligibility criteria will take part. Engager is a person-centred complex intervention delivered by practitioners and aimed at addressing offenders’ mental health and social care needs. It comprises one-to-one support for participants prior to release from prison and for up to 20 weeks postrelease. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure at 6 months postrelease. Secondary outcomes include: assessment of subjective met/unmet need, drug and alcohol use, health-related quality of life and well-being-related quality of life measured at 3, 6 and 12 months postrelease; change in objective social domains, drug and alcohol dependence, service utilisation and perceived helpfulness of services and change in psychological constructs related to desistence at 6 and 12 months postrelease; and recidivism at 12 months postrelease. A process evaluation will assess fidelity of intervention delivery, test hypothesised mechanisms of action and look for unintended consequences. An economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 (ref: 15/WA/0314) and the National Offender Management Service (ref: 2015–283). Findings will be disseminated to commissioners, clinicians and service users via papers and presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11707331; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5879493/ /pubmed/29463586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017931 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Kirkpatrick, Tim Lennox, Charlotte Taylor, Rod Anderson, Rob Maguire, Michael Haddad, Mark Michie, Susan Owens, Christabel Durcan, Graham Stirzaker, Alex Henley, William Stevenson, Caroline Carroll, Lauren Quinn, Cath Brand, Sarah Louise Harris, Tirril Stewart, Amy Todd, Roxanne Rybczynska-Bunt, Sarah Greer, Rebecca Pearson, Mark Shaw, Jenny Byng, Richard Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of a complex intervention (Engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of a complex intervention (engager) for prisoners with common mental health problems, near to and after release: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkpatricktim evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lennoxcharlotte evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taylorrod evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT andersonrob evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maguiremichael evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haddadmark evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT michiesusan evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT owenschristabel evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT durcangraham evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stirzakeralex evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT henleywilliam evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stevensoncaroline evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT carrolllauren evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT quinncath evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brandsarahlouise evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harristirril evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stewartamy evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT toddroxanne evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rybczynskabuntsarah evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT greerrebecca evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pearsonmark evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shawjenny evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT byngrichard evaluationofacomplexinterventionengagerforprisonerswithcommonmentalhealthproblemsneartoandafterreleasestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |