Cargando…

Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: According to the WHO, osteoporosis is one of the most important non- communicable diseases worldwide. Different screening procedures are controversially discussed, especially concerning the concomitant issues of overdiagnosis and harm caused by inappropriate Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DX...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zechmann, Stefan, Scherz, Nathalie, Reich, Oliver, Brüngger, Beat, Senn, Oliver, Rosemann, Thomas, Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5305-0
_version_ 1783311021286359040
author Zechmann, Stefan
Scherz, Nathalie
Reich, Oliver
Brüngger, Beat
Senn, Oliver
Rosemann, Thomas
Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
author_facet Zechmann, Stefan
Scherz, Nathalie
Reich, Oliver
Brüngger, Beat
Senn, Oliver
Rosemann, Thomas
Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
author_sort Zechmann, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to the WHO, osteoporosis is one of the most important non- communicable diseases worldwide. Different screening procedures are controversially discussed, especially concerning the concomitant issues of overdiagnosis and harm caused by inappropriate Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and appropriateness of DXA as screening measure in Switzerland considering individual risk factors and to evaluate covariates independently associated with potentially inappropriate DXA screening. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study using insurance claim data of 2013. Among all patients with DXA screening, women < 65 and men < 70 years without osteoporosis or risk factors for osteoporosis were defined as receiving potentially inappropriate DXA. Statistics included descriptive measures and multivariable regressions to estimate associations of relevant covariates with potentially inappropriate DXA screening. RESULTS: Of 1,131,092 patients, 552,973 were eligible. Among those 2637 of 10,000 (26.4%) underwent potentially inappropriate DXA screening. Female sex (Odds ratio 6.47, CI 6.41–6.54) and higher age showed the strongest association with any DXA screening. Female gender (Odds ratio 1.84, CI 1.49–2.26) and an income among the highest 5% (Odds ratio 1.40, CI 1.01–1.98) were significantly positively associated with potentially inappropriate DXA screening, number of chronic conditions (Odds ratio 0.67, CI 0.65–0.70) and living in the central region of Switzerland (Odds ratio 0.67, CI 0.48–0.95) negatively. CONCLUSION: One out of four DXAs for screening purpose is potentially inappropriate. Stakeholders of osteoporosis screening campaigns should focus on providing more detailed information on appropriateness of DXA screening indications (e.g. age thresholds) in order to avoid DXA overuse. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5305-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58795642018-04-04 Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study Zechmann, Stefan Scherz, Nathalie Reich, Oliver Brüngger, Beat Senn, Oliver Rosemann, Thomas Neuner-Jehle, Stefan BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: According to the WHO, osteoporosis is one of the most important non- communicable diseases worldwide. Different screening procedures are controversially discussed, especially concerning the concomitant issues of overdiagnosis and harm caused by inappropriate Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and appropriateness of DXA as screening measure in Switzerland considering individual risk factors and to evaluate covariates independently associated with potentially inappropriate DXA screening. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study using insurance claim data of 2013. Among all patients with DXA screening, women < 65 and men < 70 years without osteoporosis or risk factors for osteoporosis were defined as receiving potentially inappropriate DXA. Statistics included descriptive measures and multivariable regressions to estimate associations of relevant covariates with potentially inappropriate DXA screening. RESULTS: Of 1,131,092 patients, 552,973 were eligible. Among those 2637 of 10,000 (26.4%) underwent potentially inappropriate DXA screening. Female sex (Odds ratio 6.47, CI 6.41–6.54) and higher age showed the strongest association with any DXA screening. Female gender (Odds ratio 1.84, CI 1.49–2.26) and an income among the highest 5% (Odds ratio 1.40, CI 1.01–1.98) were significantly positively associated with potentially inappropriate DXA screening, number of chronic conditions (Odds ratio 0.67, CI 0.65–0.70) and living in the central region of Switzerland (Odds ratio 0.67, CI 0.48–0.95) negatively. CONCLUSION: One out of four DXAs for screening purpose is potentially inappropriate. Stakeholders of osteoporosis screening campaigns should focus on providing more detailed information on appropriateness of DXA screening indications (e.g. age thresholds) in order to avoid DXA overuse. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5305-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879564/ /pubmed/29606111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5305-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zechmann, Stefan
Scherz, Nathalie
Reich, Oliver
Brüngger, Beat
Senn, Oliver
Rosemann, Thomas
Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
title Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
title_full Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
title_short Appropriateness of bone density measurement in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
title_sort appropriateness of bone density measurement in switzerland: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5305-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zechmannstefan appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy
AT scherznathalie appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy
AT reicholiver appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy
AT brunggerbeat appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy
AT sennoliver appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy
AT rosemannthomas appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy
AT neunerjehlestefan appropriatenessofbonedensitymeasurementinswitzerlandacrosssectionalstudy