Cargando…

A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets

BACKGROUND: Many biological knowledge bases gather data through expert curation of published literature. High data volume, selective partial curation, delays in access, and publication of data prior to the ability to curate it can result in incomplete curation of published data. Knowing which data s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Howe, Douglas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2121-6
_version_ 1783311030289432576
author Howe, Douglas G.
author_facet Howe, Douglas G.
author_sort Howe, Douglas G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many biological knowledge bases gather data through expert curation of published literature. High data volume, selective partial curation, delays in access, and publication of data prior to the ability to curate it can result in incomplete curation of published data. Knowing which data sets are incomplete and how incomplete they are remains a challenge. Awareness that a data set may be incomplete is important for proper interpretation, to avoiding flawed hypothesis generation, and can justify further exploration of published literature for additional relevant data. Computational methods to assess data set completeness are needed. One such method is presented here. RESULTS: In this work, a multivariate linear regression model was used to identify genes in the Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN) Database having incomplete curated gene expression data sets. Starting with 36,655 gene records from ZFIN, data aggregation, cleansing, and filtering reduced the set to 9870 gene records suitable for training and testing the model to predict the number of expression experiments per gene. Feature engineering and selection identified the following predictive variables: the number of journal publications; the number of journal publications already attributed for gene expression annotation; the percent of journal publications already attributed for expression data; the gene symbol; and the number of transgenic constructs associated with each gene. Twenty-five percent of the gene records (2483 genes) were used to train the model. The remaining 7387 genes were used to test the model. One hundred and twenty-two and 165 of the 7387 tested genes were identified as missing expression annotations based on their residuals being outside the model lower or upper 95% confidence interval respectively. The model had precision of 0.97 and recall of 0.71 at the negative 95% confidence interval and precision of 0.76 and recall of 0.73 at the positive 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSIONS: This method can be used to identify data sets that are incompletely curated, as demonstrated using the gene expression data set from ZFIN. This information can help both database resources and data consumers gauge when it may be useful to look further for published data to augment the existing expertly curated information. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2121-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58796142018-04-04 A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets Howe, Douglas G. BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Many biological knowledge bases gather data through expert curation of published literature. High data volume, selective partial curation, delays in access, and publication of data prior to the ability to curate it can result in incomplete curation of published data. Knowing which data sets are incomplete and how incomplete they are remains a challenge. Awareness that a data set may be incomplete is important for proper interpretation, to avoiding flawed hypothesis generation, and can justify further exploration of published literature for additional relevant data. Computational methods to assess data set completeness are needed. One such method is presented here. RESULTS: In this work, a multivariate linear regression model was used to identify genes in the Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN) Database having incomplete curated gene expression data sets. Starting with 36,655 gene records from ZFIN, data aggregation, cleansing, and filtering reduced the set to 9870 gene records suitable for training and testing the model to predict the number of expression experiments per gene. Feature engineering and selection identified the following predictive variables: the number of journal publications; the number of journal publications already attributed for gene expression annotation; the percent of journal publications already attributed for expression data; the gene symbol; and the number of transgenic constructs associated with each gene. Twenty-five percent of the gene records (2483 genes) were used to train the model. The remaining 7387 genes were used to test the model. One hundred and twenty-two and 165 of the 7387 tested genes were identified as missing expression annotations based on their residuals being outside the model lower or upper 95% confidence interval respectively. The model had precision of 0.97 and recall of 0.71 at the negative 95% confidence interval and precision of 0.76 and recall of 0.73 at the positive 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSIONS: This method can be used to identify data sets that are incompletely curated, as demonstrated using the gene expression data set from ZFIN. This information can help both database resources and data consumers gauge when it may be useful to look further for published data to augment the existing expertly curated information. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2121-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879614/ /pubmed/29609549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2121-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Howe, Douglas G.
A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
title A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
title_full A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
title_fullStr A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
title_full_unstemmed A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
title_short A statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
title_sort statistical approach to identify, monitor, and manage incomplete curated data sets
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2121-6
work_keys_str_mv AT howedouglasg astatisticalapproachtoidentifymonitorandmanageincompletecurateddatasets
AT howedouglasg statisticalapproachtoidentifymonitorandmanageincompletecurateddatasets