Cargando…

A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries

BACKGROUND: Evidence from published literature in pharmacy practice research demonstrate that the use of competency frameworks alongside standards of practice facilitate improvement in professional performance and aid expertise development. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacists’ percepti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Udoh, Arit, Bruno, Andreia, Bates, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0280-1
_version_ 1783311030996172800
author Udoh, Arit
Bruno, Andreia
Bates, Ian
author_facet Udoh, Arit
Bruno, Andreia
Bates, Ian
author_sort Udoh, Arit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence from published literature in pharmacy practice research demonstrate that the use of competency frameworks alongside standards of practice facilitate improvement in professional performance and aid expertise development. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacists’ perception of relevance to practice of the competencies and behaviours contained in the FIP Global Competency Framework (GbCF v1). The overall objective of the study was to assess the validity of the GbCF v1 framework in selected countries in Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of pharmacists practicing in 14 countries in Africa was conducted between November 2012 and December 2014. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling method was used. Data was analysed using SPSS v22. RESULTS: A total of 469 pharmacists completed the survey questionnaire. The majority (91%) of the respondents were from four countries: Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. The study results showed broad agreement on relevance to practice for 90% of the behaviours contained in the GbCF v1 framework. Observed disagreement was associated with area of pharmacy practice and the corresponding patient facing involvement (p ≤ 0.05). In general, the competencies within the ‘pharmaceutical care’ and ‘pharmaceutical public health’ clusters received higher weighting on relevance compared to the research-related competencies which had the lowest. Specific inter-country variability on weighting of relevance was observed in five behaviours in the framework although, this was due to disparity in ‘degree of relevance’ that was related to sample composition in the respective countries. CONCLUSION: The competencies contained in the GbCF v1 are relevant to pharmacy practice in the study population; however, there are some emergent differences between the African countries surveyed. Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence that was previously lacking on the relevance of the GbCF v1 competencies to pharmacy practice in the countries surveyed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-018-0280-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58796172018-04-04 A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries Udoh, Arit Bruno, Andreia Bates, Ian Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Evidence from published literature in pharmacy practice research demonstrate that the use of competency frameworks alongside standards of practice facilitate improvement in professional performance and aid expertise development. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacists’ perception of relevance to practice of the competencies and behaviours contained in the FIP Global Competency Framework (GbCF v1). The overall objective of the study was to assess the validity of the GbCF v1 framework in selected countries in Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of pharmacists practicing in 14 countries in Africa was conducted between November 2012 and December 2014. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling method was used. Data was analysed using SPSS v22. RESULTS: A total of 469 pharmacists completed the survey questionnaire. The majority (91%) of the respondents were from four countries: Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. The study results showed broad agreement on relevance to practice for 90% of the behaviours contained in the GbCF v1 framework. Observed disagreement was associated with area of pharmacy practice and the corresponding patient facing involvement (p ≤ 0.05). In general, the competencies within the ‘pharmaceutical care’ and ‘pharmaceutical public health’ clusters received higher weighting on relevance compared to the research-related competencies which had the lowest. Specific inter-country variability on weighting of relevance was observed in five behaviours in the framework although, this was due to disparity in ‘degree of relevance’ that was related to sample composition in the respective countries. CONCLUSION: The competencies contained in the GbCF v1 are relevant to pharmacy practice in the study population; however, there are some emergent differences between the African countries surveyed. Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence that was previously lacking on the relevance of the GbCF v1 competencies to pharmacy practice in the countries surveyed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-018-0280-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879617/ /pubmed/29606133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0280-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Udoh, Arit
Bruno, Andreia
Bates, Ian
A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries
title A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries
title_full A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries
title_fullStr A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries
title_full_unstemmed A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries
title_short A survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in African countries
title_sort survey of pharmacists’ perception of foundation level competencies in african countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0280-1
work_keys_str_mv AT udoharit asurveyofpharmacistsperceptionoffoundationlevelcompetenciesinafricancountries
AT brunoandreia asurveyofpharmacistsperceptionoffoundationlevelcompetenciesinafricancountries
AT batesian asurveyofpharmacistsperceptionoffoundationlevelcompetenciesinafricancountries
AT udoharit surveyofpharmacistsperceptionoffoundationlevelcompetenciesinafricancountries
AT brunoandreia surveyofpharmacistsperceptionoffoundationlevelcompetenciesinafricancountries
AT batesian surveyofpharmacistsperceptionoffoundationlevelcompetenciesinafricancountries