Cargando…
Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0 |
_version_ | 1783311033365954560 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Choi, Kui Son Hwang, Sang-Hyun Jun, Jae Kwan Han, Dong Soo Lee, You Kyoung Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, Chan Wha Lee, Do-Hoon |
author_facet | Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Choi, Kui Son Hwang, Sang-Hyun Jun, Jae Kwan Han, Dong Soo Lee, You Kyoung Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, Chan Wha Lee, Do-Hoon |
author_sort | Shin, Hye Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampling bottle (Eiken OC-Sensor). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Participants aged 50–74 years who used either a conventional container or a sampling bottle to collect a stool sample for FIT were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to survey their satisfaction with the stool collection process and their intentions to undergo FIT in subsequent screening rounds. In total, 1657 participants (1224 conventional container, 433 sampling bottle) were included for analysis. RESULTS: Satisfaction with the sampling bottle was higher than that with the conventional container (79.9% vs.73.0%, p = 0.005, respectively; aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16–2.00). Participants satisfied with the sampling bottle were more likely to be female, be of younger age (50–64 years old), have higher household income, and have prior experience with FIT. Intentions to undergo subsequent screening were stronger among those given the sampling bottle than those given the conventional container (aOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2 .48). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the stool collection process was higher with the sampling bottle. However, additional studies are needed to validate whether the increased satisfaction and stronger intentions to undergo subsequent screening with the sampling bottle could actually lead to increased uptake in subsequent rounds, along with analysis of the device’s cost effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5879644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58796442018-04-04 Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Choi, Kui Son Hwang, Sang-Hyun Jun, Jae Kwan Han, Dong Soo Lee, You Kyoung Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, Chan Wha Lee, Do-Hoon BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampling bottle (Eiken OC-Sensor). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Participants aged 50–74 years who used either a conventional container or a sampling bottle to collect a stool sample for FIT were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to survey their satisfaction with the stool collection process and their intentions to undergo FIT in subsequent screening rounds. In total, 1657 participants (1224 conventional container, 433 sampling bottle) were included for analysis. RESULTS: Satisfaction with the sampling bottle was higher than that with the conventional container (79.9% vs.73.0%, p = 0.005, respectively; aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16–2.00). Participants satisfied with the sampling bottle were more likely to be female, be of younger age (50–64 years old), have higher household income, and have prior experience with FIT. Intentions to undergo subsequent screening were stronger among those given the sampling bottle than those given the conventional container (aOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2 .48). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the stool collection process was higher with the sampling bottle. However, additional studies are needed to validate whether the increased satisfaction and stronger intentions to undergo subsequent screening with the sampling bottle could actually lead to increased uptake in subsequent rounds, along with analysis of the device’s cost effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879644/ /pubmed/29609647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Choi, Kui Son Hwang, Sang-Hyun Jun, Jae Kwan Han, Dong Soo Lee, You Kyoung Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, Chan Wha Lee, Do-Hoon Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
title | Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinhyeyoung highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT suhmina highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT choikuison highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT hwangsanghyun highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT junjaekwan highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT handongsoo highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT leeyoukyoung highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT ohjaehwan highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT leechanwha highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy AT leedohoon highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy |