Cargando…

Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Hye Young, Suh, Mina, Choi, Kui Son, Hwang, Sang-Hyun, Jun, Jae Kwan, Han, Dong Soo, Lee, You Kyoung, Oh, Jae Hwan, Lee, Chan Wha, Lee, Do-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0
_version_ 1783311033365954560
author Shin, Hye Young
Suh, Mina
Choi, Kui Son
Hwang, Sang-Hyun
Jun, Jae Kwan
Han, Dong Soo
Lee, You Kyoung
Oh, Jae Hwan
Lee, Chan Wha
Lee, Do-Hoon
author_facet Shin, Hye Young
Suh, Mina
Choi, Kui Son
Hwang, Sang-Hyun
Jun, Jae Kwan
Han, Dong Soo
Lee, You Kyoung
Oh, Jae Hwan
Lee, Chan Wha
Lee, Do-Hoon
author_sort Shin, Hye Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampling bottle (Eiken OC-Sensor). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Participants aged 50–74 years who used either a conventional container or a sampling bottle to collect a stool sample for FIT were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to survey their satisfaction with the stool collection process and their intentions to undergo FIT in subsequent screening rounds. In total, 1657 participants (1224 conventional container, 433 sampling bottle) were included for analysis. RESULTS: Satisfaction with the sampling bottle was higher than that with the conventional container (79.9% vs.73.0%, p = 0.005, respectively; aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16–2.00). Participants satisfied with the sampling bottle were more likely to be female, be of younger age (50–64 years old), have higher household income, and have prior experience with FIT. Intentions to undergo subsequent screening were stronger among those given the sampling bottle than those given the conventional container (aOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2 .48). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the stool collection process was higher with the sampling bottle. However, additional studies are needed to validate whether the increased satisfaction and stronger intentions to undergo subsequent screening with the sampling bottle could actually lead to increased uptake in subsequent rounds, along with analysis of the device’s cost effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58796442018-04-04 Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study Shin, Hye Young Suh, Mina Choi, Kui Son Hwang, Sang-Hyun Jun, Jae Kwan Han, Dong Soo Lee, You Kyoung Oh, Jae Hwan Lee, Chan Wha Lee, Do-Hoon BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Identifying preferences for stool collection devices may help increase uptake rates for colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical test (FIT). This study surveyed satisfaction with different devices utilized to collect stool samples for FIT: a conventional container and a sampling bottle (Eiken OC-Sensor). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Participants aged 50–74 years who used either a conventional container or a sampling bottle to collect a stool sample for FIT were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to survey their satisfaction with the stool collection process and their intentions to undergo FIT in subsequent screening rounds. In total, 1657 participants (1224 conventional container, 433 sampling bottle) were included for analysis. RESULTS: Satisfaction with the sampling bottle was higher than that with the conventional container (79.9% vs.73.0%, p = 0.005, respectively; aOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.16–2.00). Participants satisfied with the sampling bottle were more likely to be female, be of younger age (50–64 years old), have higher household income, and have prior experience with FIT. Intentions to undergo subsequent screening were stronger among those given the sampling bottle than those given the conventional container (aOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2 .48). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the stool collection process was higher with the sampling bottle. However, additional studies are needed to validate whether the increased satisfaction and stronger intentions to undergo subsequent screening with the sampling bottle could actually lead to increased uptake in subsequent rounds, along with analysis of the device’s cost effectiveness. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879644/ /pubmed/29609647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shin, Hye Young
Suh, Mina
Choi, Kui Son
Hwang, Sang-Hyun
Jun, Jae Kwan
Han, Dong Soo
Lee, You Kyoung
Oh, Jae Hwan
Lee, Chan Wha
Lee, Do-Hoon
Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
title Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
title_full Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
title_short Higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
title_sort higher satisfaction with an alternative collection device for stool sampling in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4290-0
work_keys_str_mv AT shinhyeyoung highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT suhmina highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT choikuison highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT hwangsanghyun highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT junjaekwan highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT handongsoo highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT leeyoukyoung highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT ohjaehwan highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT leechanwha highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy
AT leedohoon highersatisfactionwithanalternativecollectiondeviceforstoolsamplingincolorectalcancerscreeningwithfecalimmunochemicaltestacrosssectionalstudy