Cargando…
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6 |
_version_ | 1783311054660435968 |
---|---|
author | Caruso, Silvia Dinoi, Teresa Marzo, Giuseppe Campanella, Vincenzo Giuca, Maria Rita Gatto, Roberto Pasini, Marco |
author_facet | Caruso, Silvia Dinoi, Teresa Marzo, Giuseppe Campanella, Vincenzo Giuca, Maria Rita Gatto, Roberto Pasini, Marco |
author_sort | Caruso, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxide. METHODS: Records of 400 primary molars in 360 paediatric participants (mean age: 7.5 ± 1.6 years, ranging from 5 to 9 years) with dental caries who required pulp therapy were included in this study. Biodentine was used on 200 teeth, and calcium hydroxide (CH) was used on another 200 teeth, as a pulpotomy material. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after 9 and 18 months. Statistical analysis was evaluated with the chi-squared test, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The treatment success with CH was 85.5% after 9 months and 79.5% after 18 months, while the success rate of biodentine was 94% after 9 months and 89.5% after 18 months. The statistical analysis with the Chi-squared test showed that the clinical and radiographic success rate with biodentine was significantly higher than CH (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biodentine exhibited a higher clinical and radiographic success rate compared to CH. However, besides the clinical results, biodentine has some disadvantages, such as higher costs, compared to CH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5879808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58798082018-04-04 Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study Caruso, Silvia Dinoi, Teresa Marzo, Giuseppe Campanella, Vincenzo Giuca, Maria Rita Gatto, Roberto Pasini, Marco BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxide. METHODS: Records of 400 primary molars in 360 paediatric participants (mean age: 7.5 ± 1.6 years, ranging from 5 to 9 years) with dental caries who required pulp therapy were included in this study. Biodentine was used on 200 teeth, and calcium hydroxide (CH) was used on another 200 teeth, as a pulpotomy material. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after 9 and 18 months. Statistical analysis was evaluated with the chi-squared test, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The treatment success with CH was 85.5% after 9 months and 79.5% after 18 months, while the success rate of biodentine was 94% after 9 months and 89.5% after 18 months. The statistical analysis with the Chi-squared test showed that the clinical and radiographic success rate with biodentine was significantly higher than CH (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biodentine exhibited a higher clinical and radiographic success rate compared to CH. However, besides the clinical results, biodentine has some disadvantages, such as higher costs, compared to CH. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879808/ /pubmed/29609572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Caruso, Silvia Dinoi, Teresa Marzo, Giuseppe Campanella, Vincenzo Giuca, Maria Rita Gatto, Roberto Pasini, Marco Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
title | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
title_full | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
title_short | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
title_sort | clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carusosilvia clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy AT dinoiteresa clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy AT marzogiuseppe clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy AT campanellavincenzo clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy AT giucamariarita clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy AT gattoroberto clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy AT pasinimarco clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy |