Cargando…

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caruso, Silvia, Dinoi, Teresa, Marzo, Giuseppe, Campanella, Vincenzo, Giuca, Maria Rita, Gatto, Roberto, Pasini, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6
_version_ 1783311054660435968
author Caruso, Silvia
Dinoi, Teresa
Marzo, Giuseppe
Campanella, Vincenzo
Giuca, Maria Rita
Gatto, Roberto
Pasini, Marco
author_facet Caruso, Silvia
Dinoi, Teresa
Marzo, Giuseppe
Campanella, Vincenzo
Giuca, Maria Rita
Gatto, Roberto
Pasini, Marco
author_sort Caruso, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxide. METHODS: Records of 400 primary molars in 360 paediatric participants (mean age: 7.5 ± 1.6 years, ranging from 5 to 9 years) with dental caries who required pulp therapy were included in this study. Biodentine was used on 200 teeth, and calcium hydroxide (CH) was used on another 200 teeth, as a pulpotomy material. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after 9 and 18 months. Statistical analysis was evaluated with the chi-squared test, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The treatment success with CH was 85.5% after 9 months and 79.5% after 18 months, while the success rate of biodentine was 94% after 9 months and 89.5% after 18 months. The statistical analysis with the Chi-squared test showed that the clinical and radiographic success rate with biodentine was significantly higher than CH (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biodentine exhibited a higher clinical and radiographic success rate compared to CH. However, besides the clinical results, biodentine has some disadvantages, such as higher costs, compared to CH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58798082018-04-04 Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study Caruso, Silvia Dinoi, Teresa Marzo, Giuseppe Campanella, Vincenzo Giuca, Maria Rita Gatto, Roberto Pasini, Marco BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Pulpotomy is the surgical removal of the entire coronal pulp with preservation of the radicular pulp vitality. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of pulpotomy of primary molars using two materials, biodentine and calcium hydroxide. METHODS: Records of 400 primary molars in 360 paediatric participants (mean age: 7.5 ± 1.6 years, ranging from 5 to 9 years) with dental caries who required pulp therapy were included in this study. Biodentine was used on 200 teeth, and calcium hydroxide (CH) was used on another 200 teeth, as a pulpotomy material. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed after 9 and 18 months. Statistical analysis was evaluated with the chi-squared test, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The treatment success with CH was 85.5% after 9 months and 79.5% after 18 months, while the success rate of biodentine was 94% after 9 months and 89.5% after 18 months. The statistical analysis with the Chi-squared test showed that the clinical and radiographic success rate with biodentine was significantly higher than CH (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Biodentine exhibited a higher clinical and radiographic success rate compared to CH. However, besides the clinical results, biodentine has some disadvantages, such as higher costs, compared to CH. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5879808/ /pubmed/29609572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Caruso, Silvia
Dinoi, Teresa
Marzo, Giuseppe
Campanella, Vincenzo
Giuca, Maria Rita
Gatto, Roberto
Pasini, Marco
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
title Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
title_full Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
title_short Clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
title_sort clinical and radiographic evaluation of biodentine versus calcium hydroxide in primary teeth pulpotomies: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0522-6
work_keys_str_mv AT carusosilvia clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy
AT dinoiteresa clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy
AT marzogiuseppe clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy
AT campanellavincenzo clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy
AT giucamariarita clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy
AT gattoroberto clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy
AT pasinimarco clinicalandradiographicevaluationofbiodentineversuscalciumhydroxideinprimaryteethpulpotomiesaretrospectivestudy