Cargando…
Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of training strategy on team deployment of a mechanical chest compression device. DESIGN: Randomised controlled manikin trial. SETTING: Large teaching hospital in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty teams, each comprising three clinicians. Participating individuals were h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019009 |
_version_ | 1783311056556261376 |
---|---|
author | Couper, Keith Velho, Rochelle M Quinn, Tom Devrell, Anne Lall, Ranjit Orriss, Barry Yeung, Joyce Perkins, Gavin D |
author_facet | Couper, Keith Velho, Rochelle M Quinn, Tom Devrell, Anne Lall, Ranjit Orriss, Barry Yeung, Joyce Perkins, Gavin D |
author_sort | Couper, Keith |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of training strategy on team deployment of a mechanical chest compression device. DESIGN: Randomised controlled manikin trial. SETTING: Large teaching hospital in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty teams, each comprising three clinicians. Participating individuals were health professionals with intermediate or advanced resuscitation training. INTERVENTIONS: Teams were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard mechanical chest compression device training or pit-crew device training. Training interventions lasted up to 1 h. Performance was measured immediately after training in a standardised simulated cardiac arrest scenario in which teams were required to deploy a mechanical chest compression device. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was chest compression flow fraction in the minute preceding the first mechanical chest compression. Secondary outcomes included cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and mechanical device deployment metrics, and non-technical skill performance. Outcomes were assessed using video recordings of the test scenario. RESULTS: In relation to the primary outcome of chest compression flow fraction in the minute preceding the first mechanical chest compression, we found that pit-crew training was not superior to standard training (0.76 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.79) vs 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82), mean difference −0.01 (95% CI −0.06 to 0.03), P=0.572). There was also no difference between groups in performance in relation to any secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pit-crew training, compared with standard training, did not improve team deployment of a mechanical chest device in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN43049287; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5879816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58798162018-04-03 Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study Couper, Keith Velho, Rochelle M Quinn, Tom Devrell, Anne Lall, Ranjit Orriss, Barry Yeung, Joyce Perkins, Gavin D BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of training strategy on team deployment of a mechanical chest compression device. DESIGN: Randomised controlled manikin trial. SETTING: Large teaching hospital in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty teams, each comprising three clinicians. Participating individuals were health professionals with intermediate or advanced resuscitation training. INTERVENTIONS: Teams were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard mechanical chest compression device training or pit-crew device training. Training interventions lasted up to 1 h. Performance was measured immediately after training in a standardised simulated cardiac arrest scenario in which teams were required to deploy a mechanical chest compression device. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was chest compression flow fraction in the minute preceding the first mechanical chest compression. Secondary outcomes included cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and mechanical device deployment metrics, and non-technical skill performance. Outcomes were assessed using video recordings of the test scenario. RESULTS: In relation to the primary outcome of chest compression flow fraction in the minute preceding the first mechanical chest compression, we found that pit-crew training was not superior to standard training (0.76 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.79) vs 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82), mean difference −0.01 (95% CI −0.06 to 0.03), P=0.572). There was also no difference between groups in performance in relation to any secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pit-crew training, compared with standard training, did not improve team deployment of a mechanical chest device in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN43049287; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5879816/ /pubmed/29391379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019009 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Couper, Keith Velho, Rochelle M Quinn, Tom Devrell, Anne Lall, Ranjit Orriss, Barry Yeung, Joyce Perkins, Gavin D Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
title | Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
title_full | Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
title_fullStr | Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
title_full_unstemmed | Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
title_short | Training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
title_sort | training approaches for the deployment of a mechanical chest compression device: a randomised controlled manikin study |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT couperkeith trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT velhorochellem trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT quinntom trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT devrellanne trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT lallranjit trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT orrissbarry trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT yeungjoyce trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy AT perkinsgavind trainingapproachesforthedeploymentofamechanicalchestcompressiondevicearandomisedcontrolledmanikinstudy |