Cargando…

Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and leads to progressive functional impairments. The classification of cachexia stages is essential for diagnosing and treating cachexia. However, there is a lack of simple tools with good discrimi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ting, Wang, Bangyan, Liu, Huiquan, Yang, Kaixiang, Thapa, Sudip, Zhang, Haowen, Li, Lu, Yu, Shiying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29372594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12275
_version_ 1783311094937288704
author Zhou, Ting
Wang, Bangyan
Liu, Huiquan
Yang, Kaixiang
Thapa, Sudip
Zhang, Haowen
Li, Lu
Yu, Shiying
author_facet Zhou, Ting
Wang, Bangyan
Liu, Huiquan
Yang, Kaixiang
Thapa, Sudip
Zhang, Haowen
Li, Lu
Yu, Shiying
author_sort Zhou, Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and leads to progressive functional impairments. The classification of cachexia stages is essential for diagnosing and treating cachexia. However, there is a lack of simple tools with good discrimination for classifying cachexia stages. Therefore, our study aimed to develop a clinically applicable cachexia staging score (CSS) and validate its discrimination of clinical outcomes for different cachexia stages. METHODS: Advanced cancer patients were enrolled in our study. A CSS comprising the following five components was developed: weight loss, a simple questionnaire of sarcopenia (SARC‐F), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, appetite loss, and abnormal biochemistry. According to the CSS, patients were classified into non‐cachexia, pre‐cachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia stages, and clinical outcomes were compared among the four groups. RESULTS: Of the 297 participating patients, data from 259 patients were ultimately included. Based on the CSS, patients were classified into non‐cachexia (n = 69), pre‐cachexia (n = 68), cachexia (n = 103), and refractory cachexia (n = 19) stages. Patients with more severe cachexia stages had lower skeletal muscle indexes (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004 in male and female patients, respectively), higher prevalence of sarcopenia (P = 0.017 and P = 0.027 in male and female patients, respectively), more severe symptom burden (P < 0.001), poorer quality of life (P < 0.001 for all subscales except social well‐being), and shorter survival times (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CSS is a simple and clinically applicable tool with excellent discrimination for classifying cachexia stages. This score is extremely useful for the clinical treatment and prognosis of cachexia and for designing clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5879986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58799862018-04-04 Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients Zhou, Ting Wang, Bangyan Liu, Huiquan Yang, Kaixiang Thapa, Sudip Zhang, Haowen Li, Lu Yu, Shiying J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Original Articles BACKGROUND: Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and leads to progressive functional impairments. The classification of cachexia stages is essential for diagnosing and treating cachexia. However, there is a lack of simple tools with good discrimination for classifying cachexia stages. Therefore, our study aimed to develop a clinically applicable cachexia staging score (CSS) and validate its discrimination of clinical outcomes for different cachexia stages. METHODS: Advanced cancer patients were enrolled in our study. A CSS comprising the following five components was developed: weight loss, a simple questionnaire of sarcopenia (SARC‐F), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, appetite loss, and abnormal biochemistry. According to the CSS, patients were classified into non‐cachexia, pre‐cachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia stages, and clinical outcomes were compared among the four groups. RESULTS: Of the 297 participating patients, data from 259 patients were ultimately included. Based on the CSS, patients were classified into non‐cachexia (n = 69), pre‐cachexia (n = 68), cachexia (n = 103), and refractory cachexia (n = 19) stages. Patients with more severe cachexia stages had lower skeletal muscle indexes (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004 in male and female patients, respectively), higher prevalence of sarcopenia (P = 0.017 and P = 0.027 in male and female patients, respectively), more severe symptom burden (P < 0.001), poorer quality of life (P < 0.001 for all subscales except social well‐being), and shorter survival times (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CSS is a simple and clinically applicable tool with excellent discrimination for classifying cachexia stages. This score is extremely useful for the clinical treatment and prognosis of cachexia and for designing clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-25 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5879986/ /pubmed/29372594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12275 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhou, Ting
Wang, Bangyan
Liu, Huiquan
Yang, Kaixiang
Thapa, Sudip
Zhang, Haowen
Li, Lu
Yu, Shiying
Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
title Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
title_full Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
title_fullStr Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
title_short Development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
title_sort development and validation of a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in advanced cancer patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29372594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12275
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouting developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT wangbangyan developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT liuhuiquan developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT yangkaixiang developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT thapasudip developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT zhanghaowen developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT lilu developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients
AT yushiying developmentandvalidationofaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinadvancedcancerpatients