Cargando…

Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET on treatment planning and sparing of normal tissue in the treatment of skull base meningioma with advanced photons and protons. METHODS: From the institutional database consisting of 507 skull base meningiomas 10 patients were chosen randomly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stade, Falk, Dittmar, Jan-Oliver, Jäkel, Oliver, Kratochwil, Clemens, Haberkorn, Uwe, Debus, Jürgen, Combs, Stephanie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1008-z
_version_ 1783311099142078464
author Stade, Falk
Dittmar, Jan-Oliver
Jäkel, Oliver
Kratochwil, Clemens
Haberkorn, Uwe
Debus, Jürgen
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_facet Stade, Falk
Dittmar, Jan-Oliver
Jäkel, Oliver
Kratochwil, Clemens
Haberkorn, Uwe
Debus, Jürgen
Combs, Stephanie E.
author_sort Stade, Falk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET on treatment planning and sparing of normal tissue in the treatment of skull base meningioma with advanced photons and protons. METHODS: From the institutional database consisting of 507 skull base meningiomas 10 patients were chosen randomly for the present analysis. Target volume definition was performed based on CT and MRI only, as well as with additional (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Treatment plans were performed for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy using active raster scanning on both target volumes. We calculated doses to relevant organs at risk (OAR), conformity indices as well as differences in normal tissue sparing between both radiation modalities based on CT/MRI planning as well as CT/MRI/PET planning. RESULTS: For photon treatment plans, PET-based treatment plans showed a reduction of brain stem D(max) and D(median) for different levels of total dose. At the optic chiasm, use of (68)Ga-DOTATOC significantly reduces D(max); moreover, the D(median) is reduced in most cases, too. For both right and left optic nerve, reduction of dose by addition of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal and depends on the anatomical location of the meningioma. In protons, the impact of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal compared to photons. CONCLUSION: Addition of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET information into treatment planning for skull base meningiomas has a significant impact on target volumes. In most cases, PET-planning leads to significant reductions of the treatment volumes. Subsequently, reduced doses are applied to OAR. Using protons, the benefit of additional PET is smaller since target coverage is more conformal and dose to OAR is already reduced compared to photons. Therefore, PET-imaging has the greatest margin of benefit in advanced photon techniques, and combination of PET-planning and high-precision treatment leads to comparable treatment plans as with protons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58800042018-04-04 Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy Stade, Falk Dittmar, Jan-Oliver Jäkel, Oliver Kratochwil, Clemens Haberkorn, Uwe Debus, Jürgen Combs, Stephanie E. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET on treatment planning and sparing of normal tissue in the treatment of skull base meningioma with advanced photons and protons. METHODS: From the institutional database consisting of 507 skull base meningiomas 10 patients were chosen randomly for the present analysis. Target volume definition was performed based on CT and MRI only, as well as with additional (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Treatment plans were performed for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy using active raster scanning on both target volumes. We calculated doses to relevant organs at risk (OAR), conformity indices as well as differences in normal tissue sparing between both radiation modalities based on CT/MRI planning as well as CT/MRI/PET planning. RESULTS: For photon treatment plans, PET-based treatment plans showed a reduction of brain stem D(max) and D(median) for different levels of total dose. At the optic chiasm, use of (68)Ga-DOTATOC significantly reduces D(max); moreover, the D(median) is reduced in most cases, too. For both right and left optic nerve, reduction of dose by addition of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal and depends on the anatomical location of the meningioma. In protons, the impact of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET is minimal compared to photons. CONCLUSION: Addition of (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET information into treatment planning for skull base meningiomas has a significant impact on target volumes. In most cases, PET-planning leads to significant reductions of the treatment volumes. Subsequently, reduced doses are applied to OAR. Using protons, the benefit of additional PET is smaller since target coverage is more conformal and dose to OAR is already reduced compared to photons. Therefore, PET-imaging has the greatest margin of benefit in advanced photon techniques, and combination of PET-planning and high-precision treatment leads to comparable treatment plans as with protons. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5880004/ /pubmed/29606149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1008-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Stade, Falk
Dittmar, Jan-Oliver
Jäkel, Oliver
Kratochwil, Clemens
Haberkorn, Uwe
Debus, Jürgen
Combs, Stephanie E.
Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_full Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_fullStr Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_short Influence of (68)Ga-DOTATOC on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
title_sort influence of (68)ga-dotatoc on sparing of normal tissue for radiation therapy of skull base meningioma: differential impact of photon and proton radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1008-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stadefalk influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT dittmarjanoliver influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT jakeloliver influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT kratochwilclemens influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT haberkornuwe influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT debusjurgen influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy
AT combsstephaniee influenceof68gadotatoconsparingofnormaltissueforradiationtherapyofskullbasemeningiomadifferentialimpactofphotonandprotonradiotherapy