Cargando…

Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND: Medical schools globally are encouraged to widen access and participation for students from less privileged backgrounds. Many strategies have been implemented to address this inequality, but much still needs to be done to ensure fair access for all. In the literature, adverse circumstanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Lysa E., Anderson, Stephanie Ann, Dowell, Johnathan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1158-6
_version_ 1783311103792513024
author Owen, Lysa E.
Anderson, Stephanie Ann
Dowell, Johnathan S.
author_facet Owen, Lysa E.
Anderson, Stephanie Ann
Dowell, Johnathan S.
author_sort Owen, Lysa E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical schools globally are encouraged to widen access and participation for students from less privileged backgrounds. Many strategies have been implemented to address this inequality, but much still needs to be done to ensure fair access for all. In the literature, adverse circumstances include financial issues, poor educational experience and lack of professional-status parents. In order to take account of adverse circumstances faced by applicants, The University of Dundee School of Medicine offers applicants the opportunity to report circumstances which may have resulted in disadvantage. Applicants do this by completing a free text statement, known as an ‘adversity statement’, in addition to the other application information. This study analysed adversity statements submitted by applicants during two admissions cycles. Analysis of content and theme was done to identify the information applicants wished to be taken into consideration, and what range of adverse circumstances individuals reported. METHODS: This study used a qualitative approach with thematic analysis to categorise the adversity statements. The data was initially analysed to create a coding framework which was then applied to the whole data set. Each coded segment was then analysed for heterogeneity and homogeneity, segments merged into generated themes, or to create sub-themes. RESULTS: The data set comprised a total of 384 adversity statements. These showed a wide range of detail involving family, personal health, education and living circumstances. Some circumstances, such as geographical location, have been identified and explored in previous research, while others, such as long term health conditions, have had less attention in the literature. The degree of impact, the length of statement and degree of detail, demonstrated wide variation between submissions. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the debate on best practice in contextual admissions and raises awareness of the range of circumstances and impact applicants wish to be considered. The themes which emerged from the data included family, school, personal health, and geographical location issues. Descriptions of the degree of impact that an adverse circumstance had on educational or other attainment was found to vary substantially from statements indicating minor, impact through to circumstances stated as causing major impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58800242018-04-04 Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis Owen, Lysa E. Anderson, Stephanie Ann Dowell, Johnathan S. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical schools globally are encouraged to widen access and participation for students from less privileged backgrounds. Many strategies have been implemented to address this inequality, but much still needs to be done to ensure fair access for all. In the literature, adverse circumstances include financial issues, poor educational experience and lack of professional-status parents. In order to take account of adverse circumstances faced by applicants, The University of Dundee School of Medicine offers applicants the opportunity to report circumstances which may have resulted in disadvantage. Applicants do this by completing a free text statement, known as an ‘adversity statement’, in addition to the other application information. This study analysed adversity statements submitted by applicants during two admissions cycles. Analysis of content and theme was done to identify the information applicants wished to be taken into consideration, and what range of adverse circumstances individuals reported. METHODS: This study used a qualitative approach with thematic analysis to categorise the adversity statements. The data was initially analysed to create a coding framework which was then applied to the whole data set. Each coded segment was then analysed for heterogeneity and homogeneity, segments merged into generated themes, or to create sub-themes. RESULTS: The data set comprised a total of 384 adversity statements. These showed a wide range of detail involving family, personal health, education and living circumstances. Some circumstances, such as geographical location, have been identified and explored in previous research, while others, such as long term health conditions, have had less attention in the literature. The degree of impact, the length of statement and degree of detail, demonstrated wide variation between submissions. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the debate on best practice in contextual admissions and raises awareness of the range of circumstances and impact applicants wish to be considered. The themes which emerged from the data included family, school, personal health, and geographical location issues. Descriptions of the degree of impact that an adverse circumstance had on educational or other attainment was found to vary substantially from statements indicating minor, impact through to circumstances stated as causing major impact. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5880024/ /pubmed/29609609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1158-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Owen, Lysa E.
Anderson, Stephanie Ann
Dowell, Johnathan S.
Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
title Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
title_full Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
title_short Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
title_sort free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1158-6
work_keys_str_mv AT owenlysae freetextadversitystatementsaspartofacontextualisedadmissionsprocessaqualitativeanalysis
AT andersonstephanieann freetextadversitystatementsaspartofacontextualisedadmissionsprocessaqualitativeanalysis
AT dowelljohnathans freetextadversitystatementsaspartofacontextualisedadmissionsprocessaqualitativeanalysis