Cargando…
The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with biennial fecal occult blood test has been shown to reduce CRC mortality. For the effectiveness of the CRC screening program is crucial that a high-quality colonoscopy with a high adenoma detection rate (ADR) be performed. To improve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0578-8515 |
_version_ | 1783311105223819264 |
---|---|
author | Cavallaro, Lucas G. Hassan, Cesare Lecis, Pierenrico Galliani, Ermenegildo Dal Pont, Elisabetta Iuzzolino, Paolo Roldo, Claudia Soppelsa, Fabio Germanà, Bastianello |
author_facet | Cavallaro, Lucas G. Hassan, Cesare Lecis, Pierenrico Galliani, Ermenegildo Dal Pont, Elisabetta Iuzzolino, Paolo Roldo, Claudia Soppelsa, Fabio Germanà, Bastianello |
author_sort | Cavallaro, Lucas G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with biennial fecal occult blood test has been shown to reduce CRC mortality. For the effectiveness of the CRC screening program is crucial that a high-quality colonoscopy with a high adenoma detection rate (ADR) be performed. To improve ADR, various endoscopic devices have been developed. Endocuff, an endoscopic cap with finger-like projections, has been shown to improve ADR. The aim of this study was to compare in an organized CRC screening program ADR, advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) and mean number of adenomas per patient (MAP) using standard colonoscopy (SC) and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared performance of SC (in 2014) and EAC (in 2015) in consecutive participants in an organized CRC screening program. RESULTS: SC and EAC were performed in 546 (284 males) and 519 (293 males) subjects, respectively (mean age 60 years). Cecal intubation rate was 97.4 % for SC and 97.1 % for EAC and not significantly different ( P = 0.7). ADR was 47 % for SC and 52 % for EAC, P = 0.1. MAP in SC and EAC were 0.87 (range: 0 – 7) and 1.11 (range: 0 – 13) respectively, P = 0.02. AADR rate was 25 % and 23 % for SC and EAC, respectively, P = 0.5. CONCLUSION: Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy does not improve the number of patients with at least one adenoma but it may increase the number of detected adenomas per procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5880036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58800362018-04-03 The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program Cavallaro, Lucas G. Hassan, Cesare Lecis, Pierenrico Galliani, Ermenegildo Dal Pont, Elisabetta Iuzzolino, Paolo Roldo, Claudia Soppelsa, Fabio Germanà, Bastianello Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with biennial fecal occult blood test has been shown to reduce CRC mortality. For the effectiveness of the CRC screening program is crucial that a high-quality colonoscopy with a high adenoma detection rate (ADR) be performed. To improve ADR, various endoscopic devices have been developed. Endocuff, an endoscopic cap with finger-like projections, has been shown to improve ADR. The aim of this study was to compare in an organized CRC screening program ADR, advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) and mean number of adenomas per patient (MAP) using standard colonoscopy (SC) and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared performance of SC (in 2014) and EAC (in 2015) in consecutive participants in an organized CRC screening program. RESULTS: SC and EAC were performed in 546 (284 males) and 519 (293 males) subjects, respectively (mean age 60 years). Cecal intubation rate was 97.4 % for SC and 97.1 % for EAC and not significantly different ( P = 0.7). ADR was 47 % for SC and 52 % for EAC, P = 0.1. MAP in SC and EAC were 0.87 (range: 0 – 7) and 1.11 (range: 0 – 13) respectively, P = 0.02. AADR rate was 25 % and 23 % for SC and EAC, respectively, P = 0.5. CONCLUSION: Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy does not improve the number of patients with at least one adenoma but it may increase the number of detected adenomas per procedure. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-04 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5880036/ /pubmed/29616237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0578-8515 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cavallaro, Lucas G. Hassan, Cesare Lecis, Pierenrico Galliani, Ermenegildo Dal Pont, Elisabetta Iuzzolino, Paolo Roldo, Claudia Soppelsa, Fabio Germanà, Bastianello The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
title | The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
title_full | The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
title_fullStr | The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
title_short | The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
title_sort | impact of endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0578-8515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavallarolucasg theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT hassancesare theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT lecispierenrico theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT gallianiermenegildo theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT dalpontelisabetta theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT iuzzolinopaolo theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT roldoclaudia theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT soppelsafabio theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT germanabastianello theimpactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT cavallarolucasg impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT hassancesare impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT lecispierenrico impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT gallianiermenegildo impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT dalpontelisabetta impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT iuzzolinopaolo impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT roldoclaudia impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT soppelsafabio impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram AT germanabastianello impactofendocuffassistedcolonoscopyonadenomadetectioninanorganizedscreeningprogram |