Cargando…

Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Taiwan has generated a need for a disease-specific quality-of-life measuring instrument. We aimed to validate the Taiwan Chinese version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Ming-Hung, Chen, Ling-Ping, Ho, Thien-Fiew, Shih, Ying-Yih, Huang, Ching-Shui, Chie, Wei-Chu, Huang, Chi-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4312-y
_version_ 1783311108397858816
author Shen, Ming-Hung
Chen, Ling-Ping
Ho, Thien-Fiew
Shih, Ying-Yih
Huang, Ching-Shui
Chie, Wei-Chu
Huang, Chi-Cheng
author_facet Shen, Ming-Hung
Chen, Ling-Ping
Ho, Thien-Fiew
Shih, Ying-Yih
Huang, Ching-Shui
Chie, Wei-Chu
Huang, Chi-Cheng
author_sort Shen, Ming-Hung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Taiwan has generated a need for a disease-specific quality-of-life measuring instrument. We aimed to validate the Taiwan Chinese version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29. METHODS: A total of 108 patients were interviewed. Convergent and discriminant validity, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, test-retest reliability, and known-groups comparisons were used to examine the reliability and validity. RESULTS: We found good internal consistency reliability for multi-item scales of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29, except for the cognitive function and pain scale of the QLQ-C30. Patients in the active treatment group reported compromised functional scale scores (global health status/quality of life, QLQ-C30) and worse symptoms (blood and mucus in stool, QLQ-CR29) than those in the follow-up group. Similar results were found in comparisons based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and Bristol Stool Scale: higher physical function/sexual interest, less fatigue/urine frequency symptoms for patients with the lowest ECOG Performance Status (Grade 0), and borderline worse stool frequency scores from Types 5 and 6 patients on the Bristol Stool Scale. CONCLUSION: The study validated the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29. The clinical applicability warrants further studies with greater number of participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58800672018-04-04 Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients Shen, Ming-Hung Chen, Ling-Ping Ho, Thien-Fiew Shih, Ying-Yih Huang, Ching-Shui Chie, Wei-Chu Huang, Chi-Cheng BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Taiwan has generated a need for a disease-specific quality-of-life measuring instrument. We aimed to validate the Taiwan Chinese version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29. METHODS: A total of 108 patients were interviewed. Convergent and discriminant validity, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, test-retest reliability, and known-groups comparisons were used to examine the reliability and validity. RESULTS: We found good internal consistency reliability for multi-item scales of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29, except for the cognitive function and pain scale of the QLQ-C30. Patients in the active treatment group reported compromised functional scale scores (global health status/quality of life, QLQ-C30) and worse symptoms (blood and mucus in stool, QLQ-CR29) than those in the follow-up group. Similar results were found in comparisons based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status and Bristol Stool Scale: higher physical function/sexual interest, less fatigue/urine frequency symptoms for patients with the lowest ECOG Performance Status (Grade 0), and borderline worse stool frequency scores from Types 5 and 6 patients on the Bristol Stool Scale. CONCLUSION: The study validated the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29. The clinical applicability warrants further studies with greater number of participants. BioMed Central 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5880067/ /pubmed/29606101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4312-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shen, Ming-Hung
Chen, Ling-Ping
Ho, Thien-Fiew
Shih, Ying-Yih
Huang, Ching-Shui
Chie, Wei-Chu
Huang, Chi-Cheng
Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
title Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
title_full Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
title_fullStr Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
title_short Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
title_sort validation of the taiwan chinese version of the eortc qlq-cr29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29606101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4312-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shenminghung validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients
AT chenlingping validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients
AT hothienfiew validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients
AT shihyingyih validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients
AT huangchingshui validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients
AT chieweichu validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients
AT huangchicheng validationofthetaiwanchineseversionoftheeortcqlqcr29toassessqualityoflifeincolorectalcancerpatients