Cargando…

Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator

Radiation-induced lung damage is an important treatment-related toxicity after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). After implementing a tri-(60)Co magnetic-resonance image guided system, ViewRay(TM), we compared the associated early radiological lung density changes to those associated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Eunji, Wu, Hong-Gyun, Park, Jong Min, Kim, Jung-in, Kim, Hak Jae, Kang, Hyun-Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29608606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195196
_version_ 1783311148711411712
author Kim, Eunji
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Park, Jong Min
Kim, Jung-in
Kim, Hak Jae
Kang, Hyun-Cheol
author_facet Kim, Eunji
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Park, Jong Min
Kim, Jung-in
Kim, Hak Jae
Kang, Hyun-Cheol
author_sort Kim, Eunji
collection PubMed
description Radiation-induced lung damage is an important treatment-related toxicity after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). After implementing a tri-(60)Co magnetic-resonance image guided system, ViewRay(TM), we compared the associated early radiological lung density changes to those associated with a linear accelerator (LINAC). Eight patients treated with the tri-(60)Co system were matched 1:1 with patients treated with LINAC. Prescription doses were 52 Gy or 60 Gy in four fractions, and lung dose-volumetric parameters were calculated from each planning system. The first two follow-up computed tomography (CT) were co-registered with the planning CT through deformable registration software, and lung density was measured by isodose levels. Tumor size was matched between the two groups, but the planning target volume of LINAC was larger than that of the tri-(60)Co system (p = 0.036). With regard to clinically relevant dose-volumetric parameters in the lungs, the ipsilateral lung mean dose, V(10Gy) and V(20Gy) were significantly poorer in tri-(60)Co plans compared to LINAC plans (p = 0.012, 0.036, and 0.017, respectively). Increased lung density was not observed in the first follow-up scan compared to the planning scan. A significant change of lung density was shown in the second follow-up scan and there was no meaningful difference between the tri-(60)Co system and LINAC for all dose regions. In addition, no patient developed clinical radiation pneumonitis until the second follow-up scan. Therefore, there was no significant difference in the early radiological lung damage between the tri-(60)Co system and LINAC for lung SABR despite of the inferior plan quality of the tri-(60)Co system compared to that of LINAC. Further studies with a longer follow-up period are needed to confirm our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58803822018-04-13 Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator Kim, Eunji Wu, Hong-Gyun Park, Jong Min Kim, Jung-in Kim, Hak Jae Kang, Hyun-Cheol PLoS One Research Article Radiation-induced lung damage is an important treatment-related toxicity after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). After implementing a tri-(60)Co magnetic-resonance image guided system, ViewRay(TM), we compared the associated early radiological lung density changes to those associated with a linear accelerator (LINAC). Eight patients treated with the tri-(60)Co system were matched 1:1 with patients treated with LINAC. Prescription doses were 52 Gy or 60 Gy in four fractions, and lung dose-volumetric parameters were calculated from each planning system. The first two follow-up computed tomography (CT) were co-registered with the planning CT through deformable registration software, and lung density was measured by isodose levels. Tumor size was matched between the two groups, but the planning target volume of LINAC was larger than that of the tri-(60)Co system (p = 0.036). With regard to clinically relevant dose-volumetric parameters in the lungs, the ipsilateral lung mean dose, V(10Gy) and V(20Gy) were significantly poorer in tri-(60)Co plans compared to LINAC plans (p = 0.012, 0.036, and 0.017, respectively). Increased lung density was not observed in the first follow-up scan compared to the planning scan. A significant change of lung density was shown in the second follow-up scan and there was no meaningful difference between the tri-(60)Co system and LINAC for all dose regions. In addition, no patient developed clinical radiation pneumonitis until the second follow-up scan. Therefore, there was no significant difference in the early radiological lung damage between the tri-(60)Co system and LINAC for lung SABR despite of the inferior plan quality of the tri-(60)Co system compared to that of LINAC. Further studies with a longer follow-up period are needed to confirm our findings. Public Library of Science 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5880382/ /pubmed/29608606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195196 Text en © 2018 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Eunji
Wu, Hong-Gyun
Park, Jong Min
Kim, Jung-in
Kim, Hak Jae
Kang, Hyun-Cheol
Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
title Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
title_full Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
title_fullStr Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
title_full_unstemmed Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
title_short Lung density change after SABR: A comparative study between tri-Co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
title_sort lung density change after sabr: a comparative study between tri-co-60 magnetic resonance-guided system and linear accelerator
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29608606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195196
work_keys_str_mv AT kimeunji lungdensitychangeaftersabracomparativestudybetweentrico60magneticresonanceguidedsystemandlinearaccelerator
AT wuhonggyun lungdensitychangeaftersabracomparativestudybetweentrico60magneticresonanceguidedsystemandlinearaccelerator
AT parkjongmin lungdensitychangeaftersabracomparativestudybetweentrico60magneticresonanceguidedsystemandlinearaccelerator
AT kimjungin lungdensitychangeaftersabracomparativestudybetweentrico60magneticresonanceguidedsystemandlinearaccelerator
AT kimhakjae lungdensitychangeaftersabracomparativestudybetweentrico60magneticresonanceguidedsystemandlinearaccelerator
AT kanghyuncheol lungdensitychangeaftersabracomparativestudybetweentrico60magneticresonanceguidedsystemandlinearaccelerator