Cargando…

TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2

Reactive electrophile species (RES), including prostaglandins, phytoprostanes and 12-oxo phytodienoic acid (OPDA), activate detoxification responses in plants and animals. However, the pathways leading to the activation of defense reactions related to abiotic or biotic stress as a function of RES fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Findling, Simone, Stotz, Henrik U., Zoeller, Maria, Krischke, Markus, Zander, Mark, Gatz, Christiane, Berger, Susanne, Mueller, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29608605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195398
_version_ 1783311154279350272
author Findling, Simone
Stotz, Henrik U.
Zoeller, Maria
Krischke, Markus
Zander, Mark
Gatz, Christiane
Berger, Susanne
Mueller, Martin J.
author_facet Findling, Simone
Stotz, Henrik U.
Zoeller, Maria
Krischke, Markus
Zander, Mark
Gatz, Christiane
Berger, Susanne
Mueller, Martin J.
author_sort Findling, Simone
collection PubMed
description Reactive electrophile species (RES), including prostaglandins, phytoprostanes and 12-oxo phytodienoic acid (OPDA), activate detoxification responses in plants and animals. However, the pathways leading to the activation of defense reactions related to abiotic or biotic stress as a function of RES formation, accumulation or treatment are poorly understood in plants. Here, the thiol-modification of proteins, including the RES-activated basic region/leucine zipper transcription factor TGA2, was studied. TGA2 contains a single cysteine residue (Cys186) that was covalently modified by reactive cyclopentenones but not required for induction of detoxification genes in response to OPDA or prostaglandin A(1). Activation of the glutathione-S-transferase 6 (GST6) promoter was responsive to cyclopentenones but not to unreactive cyclopentanones, including jasmonic acid suggesting that thiol reactivity of RES is important to activate the TGA2-dependent signaling pathway resulting in GST6 activation We show that RES modify thiols in numerous proteins in vivo, however, thiol reactivity alone appears not to be sufficient for biological activity as demonstrated by the failure of several membrane permeable thiol reactive reagents to activate the GST6 promoter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58804052018-04-13 TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2 Findling, Simone Stotz, Henrik U. Zoeller, Maria Krischke, Markus Zander, Mark Gatz, Christiane Berger, Susanne Mueller, Martin J. PLoS One Research Article Reactive electrophile species (RES), including prostaglandins, phytoprostanes and 12-oxo phytodienoic acid (OPDA), activate detoxification responses in plants and animals. However, the pathways leading to the activation of defense reactions related to abiotic or biotic stress as a function of RES formation, accumulation or treatment are poorly understood in plants. Here, the thiol-modification of proteins, including the RES-activated basic region/leucine zipper transcription factor TGA2, was studied. TGA2 contains a single cysteine residue (Cys186) that was covalently modified by reactive cyclopentenones but not required for induction of detoxification genes in response to OPDA or prostaglandin A(1). Activation of the glutathione-S-transferase 6 (GST6) promoter was responsive to cyclopentenones but not to unreactive cyclopentanones, including jasmonic acid suggesting that thiol reactivity of RES is important to activate the TGA2-dependent signaling pathway resulting in GST6 activation We show that RES modify thiols in numerous proteins in vivo, however, thiol reactivity alone appears not to be sufficient for biological activity as demonstrated by the failure of several membrane permeable thiol reactive reagents to activate the GST6 promoter. Public Library of Science 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5880405/ /pubmed/29608605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195398 Text en © 2018 Findling et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Findling, Simone
Stotz, Henrik U.
Zoeller, Maria
Krischke, Markus
Zander, Mark
Gatz, Christiane
Berger, Susanne
Mueller, Martin J.
TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2
title TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2
title_full TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2
title_fullStr TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2
title_full_unstemmed TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2
title_short TGA2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of TGA2
title_sort tga2 signaling in response to reactive electrophile species is not dependent on cysteine modification of tga2
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29608605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195398
work_keys_str_mv AT findlingsimone tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT stotzhenriku tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT zoellermaria tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT krischkemarkus tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT zandermark tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT gatzchristiane tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT bergersusanne tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2
AT muellermartinj tga2signalinginresponsetoreactiveelectrophilespeciesisnotdependentoncysteinemodificationoftga2