Cargando…

A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora

A modified genomic DNA extraction method named the combination of lysozyme and ultrasonic lysis (CLU) method was used to analyze the fish intestinal microflora. In this method, the physical disruption and chemical lysis steps were combined, and some parameters in the key steps were adjusted. In addi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Zhuoran, Sun, Jingfeng, Lv, Aijun, Sung, YeongYik, Sun, Xueliang, Shi, Hongyue, Hu, Xiucai, Wang, Anli, Xing, Kezhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0578-3
_version_ 1783311197182885888
author Han, Zhuoran
Sun, Jingfeng
Lv, Aijun
Sung, YeongYik
Sun, Xueliang
Shi, Hongyue
Hu, Xiucai
Wang, Anli
Xing, Kezhi
author_facet Han, Zhuoran
Sun, Jingfeng
Lv, Aijun
Sung, YeongYik
Sun, Xueliang
Shi, Hongyue
Hu, Xiucai
Wang, Anli
Xing, Kezhi
author_sort Han, Zhuoran
collection PubMed
description A modified genomic DNA extraction method named the combination of lysozyme and ultrasonic lysis (CLU) method was used to analyze the fish intestinal microflora. In this method, the physical disruption and chemical lysis steps were combined, and some parameters in the key steps were adjusted. In addition, the results obtained by this method were compared with the results obtained by the Zirmil-beating cell disruption method and the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit. The OD(260)/OD(280) ratio and concentration of the DNA extracted using the CLU method were 2.02 and 282.8 µg/µL, respectively; when the incubation temperatures for lysozyme and RNase were adjusted to 37 °C, those values were 2.08 and 309.8 µg/µL, respectively. On the agarose gel, a major high-intensity, discrete band of more than 10 kb was found for the CLU method. However, the smearing intensity of degraded DNA was lower when the incubation temperatures were 60 °C for lysozyme and 30 °C for RNase than when incubation temperatures of 37 °C for lysozyme and 37 °C for RNase were used. The V3 variable region of the prokaryotic 16S rDNA was amplified, and an approximately 600-bp fragment was observed when the DNA extracted using the CLU method was used as a template. The CLU method is simple and cost effective, and it yields high-quality, unsheared, high-molecular-weight DNA, which is comparable to that obtained with a commercially available kit. The extracted DNA has potential for applications in critical molecular biology techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58807962018-04-06 A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora Han, Zhuoran Sun, Jingfeng Lv, Aijun Sung, YeongYik Sun, Xueliang Shi, Hongyue Hu, Xiucai Wang, Anli Xing, Kezhi AMB Express Original Article A modified genomic DNA extraction method named the combination of lysozyme and ultrasonic lysis (CLU) method was used to analyze the fish intestinal microflora. In this method, the physical disruption and chemical lysis steps were combined, and some parameters in the key steps were adjusted. In addition, the results obtained by this method were compared with the results obtained by the Zirmil-beating cell disruption method and the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit. The OD(260)/OD(280) ratio and concentration of the DNA extracted using the CLU method were 2.02 and 282.8 µg/µL, respectively; when the incubation temperatures for lysozyme and RNase were adjusted to 37 °C, those values were 2.08 and 309.8 µg/µL, respectively. On the agarose gel, a major high-intensity, discrete band of more than 10 kb was found for the CLU method. However, the smearing intensity of degraded DNA was lower when the incubation temperatures were 60 °C for lysozyme and 30 °C for RNase than when incubation temperatures of 37 °C for lysozyme and 37 °C for RNase were used. The V3 variable region of the prokaryotic 16S rDNA was amplified, and an approximately 600-bp fragment was observed when the DNA extracted using the CLU method was used as a template. The CLU method is simple and cost effective, and it yields high-quality, unsheared, high-molecular-weight DNA, which is comparable to that obtained with a commercially available kit. The extracted DNA has potential for applications in critical molecular biology techniques. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5880796/ /pubmed/29610998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0578-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Han, Zhuoran
Sun, Jingfeng
Lv, Aijun
Sung, YeongYik
Sun, Xueliang
Shi, Hongyue
Hu, Xiucai
Wang, Anli
Xing, Kezhi
A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
title A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
title_full A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
title_fullStr A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
title_full_unstemmed A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
title_short A modified method for genomic DNA extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
title_sort modified method for genomic dna extraction from the fish intestinal microflora
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29610998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0578-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzhuoran amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT sunjingfeng amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT lvaijun amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT sungyeongyik amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT sunxueliang amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT shihongyue amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT huxiucai amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT wanganli amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT xingkezhi amodifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT hanzhuoran modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT sunjingfeng modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT lvaijun modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT sungyeongyik modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT sunxueliang modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT shihongyue modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT huxiucai modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT wanganli modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora
AT xingkezhi modifiedmethodforgenomicdnaextractionfromthefishintestinalmicroflora