Cargando…
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
Teixeira da Silva and Dobránszki (Scientometrics. 10.1007/s11192-018-2680-3, 2018) describe practical problems in using the h-index for the purpose of research evaluation. For example, they discuss the h-index differences among the bibliometric databases. In this Letter to the Editor, we argue for a...
Autores principales: | Bornmann, Lutz, Leydesdorff, Loet |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2682-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Macro-Indicators of Citation Impacts of Six Prolific Countries: InCites Data and the Statistical Significance of Trends
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact
por: Leydesdorff, Loet, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield
por: Leydesdorff, Loet, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level
por: Leydesdorff, Loet, et al.
Publicado: (2016)