Cargando…

Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design

PURPOSE: Utilization of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guides is a promising navigation approach for orthopedic surgery. However, navigation errors can arise if the guide is not correctly positioned at the planned bone location, compromising the surgical outcome. Quantitative measurements of g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caiti, G., Dobbe, J. G. G., Strijkers, G. J., Strackee, S. D., Streekstra, G. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1682-6
_version_ 1783311214962540544
author Caiti, G.
Dobbe, J. G. G.
Strijkers, G. J.
Strackee, S. D.
Streekstra, G. J.
author_facet Caiti, G.
Dobbe, J. G. G.
Strijkers, G. J.
Strackee, S. D.
Streekstra, G. J.
author_sort Caiti, G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Utilization of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guides is a promising navigation approach for orthopedic surgery. However, navigation errors can arise if the guide is not correctly positioned at the planned bone location, compromising the surgical outcome. Quantitative measurements of guide positioning errors are rarely reported and have never been related to guide design and underlying bone anatomy. In this study, the positioning accuracy of a standard and an extended guide design with lateral extension is evaluated at different fitting locations (distal, mid-shaft and proximal) on the volar side of the radius. METHODS: Four operators placed the surgical guides on 3D-printed radius models obtained from the CT scans of six patients. For each radius model, every operator positioned two guide designs on the three fitting locations. The residual positioning error was quantified with a CT-based image analysis method in terms of the mean target registration error (mTRE), total translation error ([Formula: see text] ) and total rotation error ([Formula: see text] ) by comparing the actual guide position with the preoperatively planned position. Three generalized linear regression models were constructed to evaluate if the fitting location and the guide design affected mTRE, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] . RESULTS: mTRE, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were significantly higher for mid-shaft guides ([Formula: see text] ) compared to distal guides. The guide extension significantly improved the target registration and translational accuracy in all the volar radius locations ([Formula: see text] ). However, in the mid-shaft region, the guide extension yielded an increased total rotational error ([Formula: see text] ). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that positioning accuracy depends on the fitting location and on the guide design. In distal and proximal radial regions, the accuracy of guides with lateral extension is higher than standard guides and is therefore recommended for future use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5880872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58808722018-04-05 Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design Caiti, G. Dobbe, J. G. G. Strijkers, G. J. Strackee, S. D. Streekstra, G. J. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Utilization of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical guides is a promising navigation approach for orthopedic surgery. However, navigation errors can arise if the guide is not correctly positioned at the planned bone location, compromising the surgical outcome. Quantitative measurements of guide positioning errors are rarely reported and have never been related to guide design and underlying bone anatomy. In this study, the positioning accuracy of a standard and an extended guide design with lateral extension is evaluated at different fitting locations (distal, mid-shaft and proximal) on the volar side of the radius. METHODS: Four operators placed the surgical guides on 3D-printed radius models obtained from the CT scans of six patients. For each radius model, every operator positioned two guide designs on the three fitting locations. The residual positioning error was quantified with a CT-based image analysis method in terms of the mean target registration error (mTRE), total translation error ([Formula: see text] ) and total rotation error ([Formula: see text] ) by comparing the actual guide position with the preoperatively planned position. Three generalized linear regression models were constructed to evaluate if the fitting location and the guide design affected mTRE, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] . RESULTS: mTRE, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were significantly higher for mid-shaft guides ([Formula: see text] ) compared to distal guides. The guide extension significantly improved the target registration and translational accuracy in all the volar radius locations ([Formula: see text] ). However, in the mid-shaft region, the guide extension yielded an increased total rotational error ([Formula: see text] ). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that positioning accuracy depends on the fitting location and on the guide design. In distal and proximal radial regions, the accuracy of guides with lateral extension is higher than standard guides and is therefore recommended for future use. Springer International Publishing 2017-11-06 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5880872/ /pubmed/29110185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1682-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Caiti, G.
Dobbe, J. G. G.
Strijkers, G. J.
Strackee, S. D.
Streekstra, G. J.
Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
title Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
title_full Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
title_fullStr Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
title_full_unstemmed Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
title_short Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
title_sort positioning error of custom 3d-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5880872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1682-6
work_keys_str_mv AT caitig positioningerrorofcustom3dprintedsurgicalguidesfortheradiusinfluenceoffittinglocationandguidedesign
AT dobbejgg positioningerrorofcustom3dprintedsurgicalguidesfortheradiusinfluenceoffittinglocationandguidedesign
AT strijkersgj positioningerrorofcustom3dprintedsurgicalguidesfortheradiusinfluenceoffittinglocationandguidedesign
AT strackeesd positioningerrorofcustom3dprintedsurgicalguidesfortheradiusinfluenceoffittinglocationandguidedesign
AT streekstragj positioningerrorofcustom3dprintedsurgicalguidesfortheradiusinfluenceoffittinglocationandguidedesign