Cargando…

Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?

PURPOSE: Pre-operative lymph node (LN) size is a valuable parameter for determining treatment strategy for gastric cancer. However, a correlation between LN size and metastasis has not been established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six LN-positive (LNP) and matched 36 LN-negative (LNN) patients wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong Jin, Kim, Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629217
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e1
_version_ 1783311243349590016
author Kim, Dong Jin
Kim, Wook
author_facet Kim, Dong Jin
Kim, Wook
author_sort Kim, Dong Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pre-operative lymph node (LN) size is a valuable parameter for determining treatment strategy for gastric cancer. However, a correlation between LN size and metastasis has not been established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six LN-positive (LNP) and matched 36 LN-negative (LNN) patients were included, and pathology slides of the LNs of these patients were reviewed. All the LNs were measured along the long-axis (LA) and short-axis (SA), manually. RESULTS: Average retrieved LNs were 37.3±19.8 and 40.5±11.6 in the LNN and LNP groups, respectively. In total 2,800 LNs, including 136 metastatic LNs (MLNs) and 2,664 non-metastatic LNs (nMLNs), were evaluated. Mean length was significantly more in MLNs along both, the LA and SA (MLN_LA vs. nMLN_LA: 4.97±3.84 vs. 3.37±2.40 mm, MLN_SA vs. nMLN_SA: 3.86±3.19 vs. 2.43±1.59 mm; P<0.001). However, 92.6% (126/136) and 95.6% (130/136) of MLNs were <10 mm along the LA and SA, respectively. In addition, only 22.2% of the LNP group exhibited an MLN as the largest LN. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative multi-detector computed tomography has limited ability in estimating the presence of metastasis in LNs because most MLNs are less than 10 mm, and only a small proportion of the LNP group exhibits an MLN as the largest MLN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5881007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58810072018-04-06 Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer? Kim, Dong Jin Kim, Wook J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Pre-operative lymph node (LN) size is a valuable parameter for determining treatment strategy for gastric cancer. However, a correlation between LN size and metastasis has not been established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six LN-positive (LNP) and matched 36 LN-negative (LNN) patients were included, and pathology slides of the LNs of these patients were reviewed. All the LNs were measured along the long-axis (LA) and short-axis (SA), manually. RESULTS: Average retrieved LNs were 37.3±19.8 and 40.5±11.6 in the LNN and LNP groups, respectively. In total 2,800 LNs, including 136 metastatic LNs (MLNs) and 2,664 non-metastatic LNs (nMLNs), were evaluated. Mean length was significantly more in MLNs along both, the LA and SA (MLN_LA vs. nMLN_LA: 4.97±3.84 vs. 3.37±2.40 mm, MLN_SA vs. nMLN_SA: 3.86±3.19 vs. 2.43±1.59 mm; P<0.001). However, 92.6% (126/136) and 95.6% (130/136) of MLNs were <10 mm along the LA and SA, respectively. In addition, only 22.2% of the LNP group exhibited an MLN as the largest LN. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative multi-detector computed tomography has limited ability in estimating the presence of metastasis in LNs because most MLNs are less than 10 mm, and only a small proportion of the LNP group exhibits an MLN as the largest MLN. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2018-03 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5881007/ /pubmed/29629217 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e1 Text en Copyright © 2018. Korean Gastric Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Dong Jin
Kim, Wook
Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?
title Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?
title_full Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?
title_fullStr Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?
title_short Is Lymph Node Size a Reliable Factor for Estimating Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer?
title_sort is lymph node size a reliable factor for estimating lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29629217
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e1
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdongjin islymphnodesizeareliablefactorforestimatinglymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer
AT kimwook islymphnodesizeareliablefactorforestimatinglymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer