Cargando…

The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections

Scientists agree that the climate is changing due to human activities, but there is less agreement about the specific consequences and their timeline. Disagreement among climate projections is attributable to the complexity of climate models that differ in their structure, parameters, initial condit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin, Daniel M., Budescu, David V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00403
_version_ 1783311284430700544
author Benjamin, Daniel M.
Budescu, David V.
author_facet Benjamin, Daniel M.
Budescu, David V.
author_sort Benjamin, Daniel M.
collection PubMed
description Scientists agree that the climate is changing due to human activities, but there is less agreement about the specific consequences and their timeline. Disagreement among climate projections is attributable to the complexity of climate models that differ in their structure, parameters, initial conditions, etc. We examine how different sources of uncertainty affect people’s interpretation of, and reaction to, information about climate change by presenting participants forecasts from multiple experts. Participants viewed three types of sets of sea-level rise projections: (1) precise, but conflicting; (2) imprecise, but agreeing, and (3) hybrid that were both conflicting and imprecise. They estimated the most likely sea-level rise, provided a range of possible values and rated the sets on several features – ambiguity, credibility, completeness, etc. In Study 1, everyone saw the same hybrid set. We found that participants were sensitive to uncertainty between sources, but not to uncertainty about which model was used. The impacts of conflict and imprecision were combined for estimation tasks and compromised for feature ratings. Estimates were closer to the experts’ original projections, and sets were rated more favorably under imprecision. Estimates were least consistent with (narrower than) the experts in the hybrid condition, but participants rated the conflicting set least favorably. In Study 2, we investigated the hybrid case in more detail by creating several distinct interval sets that combine conflict and imprecision. Two factors drive perceptual differences: overlap – the structure of the forecast set (whether intersecting, nested, tangent, or disjoint) – and asymmetry – the balance of the set. Estimates were primarily driven by asymmetry, and preferences were primarily driven by overlap. Asymmetric sets were least consistent with the experts: estimated ranges were narrower, and estimates of the most likely value were shifted further below the set mean. Intersecting and nested sets were rated similarly to imprecision, and ratings of disjoint and tangent sets were rated like conflict. Our goal was to determine which underlying factors of information sets drive perceptions of uncertainty in consistent, predictable ways. The two studies lead us to conclude that perceptions of agreement require intersection and balance, and overly precise forecasts lead to greater perceptions of disagreement and a greater likelihood of the public discrediting and misinterpreting information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5881250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58812502018-04-10 The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections Benjamin, Daniel M. Budescu, David V. Front Psychol Psychology Scientists agree that the climate is changing due to human activities, but there is less agreement about the specific consequences and their timeline. Disagreement among climate projections is attributable to the complexity of climate models that differ in their structure, parameters, initial conditions, etc. We examine how different sources of uncertainty affect people’s interpretation of, and reaction to, information about climate change by presenting participants forecasts from multiple experts. Participants viewed three types of sets of sea-level rise projections: (1) precise, but conflicting; (2) imprecise, but agreeing, and (3) hybrid that were both conflicting and imprecise. They estimated the most likely sea-level rise, provided a range of possible values and rated the sets on several features – ambiguity, credibility, completeness, etc. In Study 1, everyone saw the same hybrid set. We found that participants were sensitive to uncertainty between sources, but not to uncertainty about which model was used. The impacts of conflict and imprecision were combined for estimation tasks and compromised for feature ratings. Estimates were closer to the experts’ original projections, and sets were rated more favorably under imprecision. Estimates were least consistent with (narrower than) the experts in the hybrid condition, but participants rated the conflicting set least favorably. In Study 2, we investigated the hybrid case in more detail by creating several distinct interval sets that combine conflict and imprecision. Two factors drive perceptual differences: overlap – the structure of the forecast set (whether intersecting, nested, tangent, or disjoint) – and asymmetry – the balance of the set. Estimates were primarily driven by asymmetry, and preferences were primarily driven by overlap. Asymmetric sets were least consistent with the experts: estimated ranges were narrower, and estimates of the most likely value were shifted further below the set mean. Intersecting and nested sets were rated similarly to imprecision, and ratings of disjoint and tangent sets were rated like conflict. Our goal was to determine which underlying factors of information sets drive perceptions of uncertainty in consistent, predictable ways. The two studies lead us to conclude that perceptions of agreement require intersection and balance, and overly precise forecasts lead to greater perceptions of disagreement and a greater likelihood of the public discrediting and misinterpreting information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5881250/ /pubmed/29636717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00403 Text en Copyright © 2018 Benjamin and Budescu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Benjamin, Daniel M.
Budescu, David V.
The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections
title The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections
title_full The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections
title_fullStr The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections
title_short The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections
title_sort role of type and source of uncertainty on the processing of climate models projections
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00403
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamindanielm theroleoftypeandsourceofuncertaintyontheprocessingofclimatemodelsprojections
AT budescudavidv theroleoftypeandsourceofuncertaintyontheprocessingofclimatemodelsprojections
AT benjamindanielm roleoftypeandsourceofuncertaintyontheprocessingofclimatemodelsprojections
AT budescudavidv roleoftypeandsourceofuncertaintyontheprocessingofclimatemodelsprojections