Cargando…
Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
The use of alternative (or complementary) treatment strategies (ATSs) i.e. differing from annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) is required in some African foci to eliminate onchocerciasis by 2025. ATSs include vector control, biannual or pluriannual CDTI, better timing of CDTI,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx054 |
_version_ | 1783311286511075328 |
---|---|
author | Boussinesq, Michel Fobi, Grace Kuesel, Annette C |
author_facet | Boussinesq, Michel Fobi, Grace Kuesel, Annette C |
author_sort | Boussinesq, Michel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of alternative (or complementary) treatment strategies (ATSs) i.e. differing from annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) is required in some African foci to eliminate onchocerciasis by 2025. ATSs include vector control, biannual or pluriannual CDTI, better timing of CDTI, community-directed treatment with combinations of currently available anthelminthics or new drugs, and ‘test-and-treat’ (TNT) strategies requiring diagnosis of infection and/or contraindications to treatment for decisions on who to treat with what regimen. Two TNT strategies can be considered. Loa-first TNT, designed for loiasis-endemic areas and currently being evaluated using a rapid test (LoaScope), consists of identifying individuals with levels of Loa microfilaremia associated with a risk of post-ivermectin severe adverse events to exclude them from ivermectin treatment and in treating the rest (usually >97%) of the population safely. Oncho-first TNT consists of testing community members for onchocerciasis before giving treatment (currently ivermectin or doxycycline) to those who are infected. The choice of the ATS depends on the prevalences and intensities of infection with Onchocerca volvulus and Loa loa and on the relative cost-effectiveness of the strategies for the given epidemiological situation. Modelling can help select the optimal strategies, but field evaluations to determine the relative cost-effectiveness are urgently needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5881258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58812582019-03-01 Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis Boussinesq, Michel Fobi, Grace Kuesel, Annette C Int Health Review The use of alternative (or complementary) treatment strategies (ATSs) i.e. differing from annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) is required in some African foci to eliminate onchocerciasis by 2025. ATSs include vector control, biannual or pluriannual CDTI, better timing of CDTI, community-directed treatment with combinations of currently available anthelminthics or new drugs, and ‘test-and-treat’ (TNT) strategies requiring diagnosis of infection and/or contraindications to treatment for decisions on who to treat with what regimen. Two TNT strategies can be considered. Loa-first TNT, designed for loiasis-endemic areas and currently being evaluated using a rapid test (LoaScope), consists of identifying individuals with levels of Loa microfilaremia associated with a risk of post-ivermectin severe adverse events to exclude them from ivermectin treatment and in treating the rest (usually >97%) of the population safely. Oncho-first TNT consists of testing community members for onchocerciasis before giving treatment (currently ivermectin or doxycycline) to those who are infected. The choice of the ATS depends on the prevalences and intensities of infection with Onchocerca volvulus and Loa loa and on the relative cost-effectiveness of the strategies for the given epidemiological situation. Modelling can help select the optimal strategies, but field evaluations to determine the relative cost-effectiveness are urgently needed. Oxford University Press 2018-03 2018-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5881258/ /pubmed/29471342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx054 Text en © World Health Organization, 2018. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted Publisher permission for the reproduction of this article. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Boussinesq, Michel Fobi, Grace Kuesel, Annette C Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
title | Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
title_full | Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
title_fullStr | Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
title_short | Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
title_sort | alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boussinesqmichel alternativetreatmentstrategiestoacceleratetheeliminationofonchocerciasis AT fobigrace alternativetreatmentstrategiestoacceleratetheeliminationofonchocerciasis AT kueselannettec alternativetreatmentstrategiestoacceleratetheeliminationofonchocerciasis |