Cargando…

Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis

The use of alternative (or complementary) treatment strategies (ATSs) i.e. differing from annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) is required in some African foci to eliminate onchocerciasis by 2025. ATSs include vector control, biannual or pluriannual CDTI, better timing of CDTI,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boussinesq, Michel, Fobi, Grace, Kuesel, Annette C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx054
_version_ 1783311286511075328
author Boussinesq, Michel
Fobi, Grace
Kuesel, Annette C
author_facet Boussinesq, Michel
Fobi, Grace
Kuesel, Annette C
author_sort Boussinesq, Michel
collection PubMed
description The use of alternative (or complementary) treatment strategies (ATSs) i.e. differing from annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) is required in some African foci to eliminate onchocerciasis by 2025. ATSs include vector control, biannual or pluriannual CDTI, better timing of CDTI, community-directed treatment with combinations of currently available anthelminthics or new drugs, and ‘test-and-treat’ (TNT) strategies requiring diagnosis of infection and/or contraindications to treatment for decisions on who to treat with what regimen. Two TNT strategies can be considered. Loa-first TNT, designed for loiasis-endemic areas and currently being evaluated using a rapid test (LoaScope), consists of identifying individuals with levels of Loa microfilaremia associated with a risk of post-ivermectin severe adverse events to exclude them from ivermectin treatment and in treating the rest (usually >97%) of the population safely. Oncho-first TNT consists of testing community members for onchocerciasis before giving treatment (currently ivermectin or doxycycline) to those who are infected. The choice of the ATS depends on the prevalences and intensities of infection with Onchocerca volvulus and Loa loa and on the relative cost-effectiveness of the strategies for the given epidemiological situation. Modelling can help select the optimal strategies, but field evaluations to determine the relative cost-effectiveness are urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5881258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58812582019-03-01 Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis Boussinesq, Michel Fobi, Grace Kuesel, Annette C Int Health Review The use of alternative (or complementary) treatment strategies (ATSs) i.e. differing from annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) is required in some African foci to eliminate onchocerciasis by 2025. ATSs include vector control, biannual or pluriannual CDTI, better timing of CDTI, community-directed treatment with combinations of currently available anthelminthics or new drugs, and ‘test-and-treat’ (TNT) strategies requiring diagnosis of infection and/or contraindications to treatment for decisions on who to treat with what regimen. Two TNT strategies can be considered. Loa-first TNT, designed for loiasis-endemic areas and currently being evaluated using a rapid test (LoaScope), consists of identifying individuals with levels of Loa microfilaremia associated with a risk of post-ivermectin severe adverse events to exclude them from ivermectin treatment and in treating the rest (usually >97%) of the population safely. Oncho-first TNT consists of testing community members for onchocerciasis before giving treatment (currently ivermectin or doxycycline) to those who are infected. The choice of the ATS depends on the prevalences and intensities of infection with Onchocerca volvulus and Loa loa and on the relative cost-effectiveness of the strategies for the given epidemiological situation. Modelling can help select the optimal strategies, but field evaluations to determine the relative cost-effectiveness are urgently needed. Oxford University Press 2018-03 2018-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5881258/ /pubmed/29471342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx054 Text en © World Health Organization, 2018. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted Publisher permission for the reproduction of this article. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Boussinesq, Michel
Fobi, Grace
Kuesel, Annette C
Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
title Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
title_full Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
title_fullStr Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
title_full_unstemmed Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
title_short Alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
title_sort alternative treatment strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29471342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx054
work_keys_str_mv AT boussinesqmichel alternativetreatmentstrategiestoacceleratetheeliminationofonchocerciasis
AT fobigrace alternativetreatmentstrategiestoacceleratetheeliminationofonchocerciasis
AT kueselannettec alternativetreatmentstrategiestoacceleratetheeliminationofonchocerciasis