Cargando…

Mapping healthcare systems: a policy relevant analytic tool

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, an international consensus on the value of well-functioning systems has driven considerable health systems research. This research falls into two broad categories. The first provides conceptual frameworks that take complex healthcare systems and create simplified cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekhri Feachem, Neelam, Afshar, Ariana, Pruett, Cristina, Avanceña, Anton L.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihx005
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In the past decade, an international consensus on the value of well-functioning systems has driven considerable health systems research. This research falls into two broad categories. The first provides conceptual frameworks that take complex healthcare systems and create simplified constructs of interactions and functions. The second focuses on granular inputs and outputs. This paper presents a novel translational mapping tool – the University of California, San Francisco mapping tool (the Tool) - which bridges the gap between these two areas of research, creating a platform for multi-country comparative analysis. METHODS: Using the Murray-Frenk framework, we create a macro-level representation of a country's structure, focusing on how it finances and delivers healthcare. The map visually depicts the fundamental policy questions in healthcare system design: funding sources and amount spent through each source, purchasers, populations covered, provider categories; and the relationship between these entities. RESULTS: We use the Tool to provide a macro-level comparative analysis of the structure of India's and Thailand's healthcare systems. CONCLUSIONS: As part of the systems strengthening arsenal, the Tool can stimulate debate about the merits and consequences of different healthcare systems structural designs, using a common framework that fosters multi-country comparative analyses.