Cargando…

Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is widely accepted as the most economic and non‐invasive screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the FOBT is inconvenient because it requires a fecal sample and shows limited accuracy. Alternatively, we hypothesized that fecal gas compoun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishibe, Atsushi, Ota, Mitsuyoshi, Takeshita, Akemi, Tsuboi, Hiroshi, Kizuka, Satoko, Oka, Hidenori, Suwa, Yusuke, Suzuki, Shinsuke, Nakagawa, Kazuya, Suwa, Hirokazu, Momiyama, Masashi, Watanabe, Jun, Taguri, Masataka, Kunisaki, Chikara, Endo, Itaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29863156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12056
_version_ 1783311304110374912
author Ishibe, Atsushi
Ota, Mitsuyoshi
Takeshita, Akemi
Tsuboi, Hiroshi
Kizuka, Satoko
Oka, Hidenori
Suwa, Yusuke
Suzuki, Shinsuke
Nakagawa, Kazuya
Suwa, Hirokazu
Momiyama, Masashi
Watanabe, Jun
Taguri, Masataka
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
author_facet Ishibe, Atsushi
Ota, Mitsuyoshi
Takeshita, Akemi
Tsuboi, Hiroshi
Kizuka, Satoko
Oka, Hidenori
Suwa, Yusuke
Suzuki, Shinsuke
Nakagawa, Kazuya
Suwa, Hirokazu
Momiyama, Masashi
Watanabe, Jun
Taguri, Masataka
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
author_sort Ishibe, Atsushi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is widely accepted as the most economic and non‐invasive screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the FOBT is inconvenient because it requires a fecal sample and shows limited accuracy. Alternatively, we hypothesized that fecal gas compounds from bowel movements may be a non‐invasive biomarker for CRC. METHODS: Gas compounds were collected from the bowel movements of 30 patients with CRC and from 26 healthy controls. The patient group comprised 17 males and 13 females, and the average age was 68 years. Additionally, 22 patients had colon cancer, and eight patients had rectal cancer. Gas compounds were analyzed using gas chromatography and compared with those from healthy controls. RESULTS: In the gas analysis, methyl mercaptan was significantly higher in the CRC group than in the control group. Hydrogen was significantly lower in the CRC group than in the control group and was correlated with tumor depth and advanced disease stage. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of detection by a discriminant formula were 90%, 57.7%, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gas compounds from defecation constitute a promising, novel non‐invasive approach for CRC screening. (UMIN000028256)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5881347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58813472018-06-01 Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer Ishibe, Atsushi Ota, Mitsuyoshi Takeshita, Akemi Tsuboi, Hiroshi Kizuka, Satoko Oka, Hidenori Suwa, Yusuke Suzuki, Shinsuke Nakagawa, Kazuya Suwa, Hirokazu Momiyama, Masashi Watanabe, Jun Taguri, Masataka Kunisaki, Chikara Endo, Itaru Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is widely accepted as the most economic and non‐invasive screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the FOBT is inconvenient because it requires a fecal sample and shows limited accuracy. Alternatively, we hypothesized that fecal gas compounds from bowel movements may be a non‐invasive biomarker for CRC. METHODS: Gas compounds were collected from the bowel movements of 30 patients with CRC and from 26 healthy controls. The patient group comprised 17 males and 13 females, and the average age was 68 years. Additionally, 22 patients had colon cancer, and eight patients had rectal cancer. Gas compounds were analyzed using gas chromatography and compared with those from healthy controls. RESULTS: In the gas analysis, methyl mercaptan was significantly higher in the CRC group than in the control group. Hydrogen was significantly lower in the CRC group than in the control group and was correlated with tumor depth and advanced disease stage. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of detection by a discriminant formula were 90%, 57.7%, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gas compounds from defecation constitute a promising, novel non‐invasive approach for CRC screening. (UMIN000028256) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5881347/ /pubmed/29863156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12056 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ishibe, Atsushi
Ota, Mitsuyoshi
Takeshita, Akemi
Tsuboi, Hiroshi
Kizuka, Satoko
Oka, Hidenori
Suwa, Yusuke
Suzuki, Shinsuke
Nakagawa, Kazuya
Suwa, Hirokazu
Momiyama, Masashi
Watanabe, Jun
Taguri, Masataka
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
title Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
title_full Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
title_short Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
title_sort detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29863156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12056
work_keys_str_mv AT ishibeatsushi detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT otamitsuyoshi detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT takeshitaakemi detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT tsuboihiroshi detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT kizukasatoko detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT okahidenori detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT suwayusuke detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT suzukishinsuke detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT nakagawakazuya detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT suwahirokazu detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT momiyamamasashi detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT watanabejun detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT tagurimasataka detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT kunisakichikara detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer
AT endoitaru detectionofgascomponentsasanoveldiagnosticmethodforcolorectalcancer