Cargando…
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing...
Autor principal: | Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619142 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2014) -
Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2021) -
From Peer-Reviewed to Peer-Reproduced in Scholarly Publishing: The Complementary Roles of Data Models and Workflows in Bioinformatics
por: González-Beltrán, Alejandra, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing
por: Kulczycki, Emanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)