Cargando…

Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer

PURPOSE: Intra-vaginal packing is used to fix the applicator and displace organs at risk (OAR) during high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy (HDR-ICB). We retain the speculum from applicator placement as a dual-function bladder and rectum retractor during treatment. Our objectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sud, Shivani, Roth, Toni, Jones, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619054
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.74316
_version_ 1783311350616817664
author Sud, Shivani
Roth, Toni
Jones, Ellen
author_facet Sud, Shivani
Roth, Toni
Jones, Ellen
author_sort Sud, Shivani
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intra-vaginal packing is used to fix the applicator and displace organs at risk (OAR) during high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy (HDR-ICB). We retain the speculum from applicator placement as a dual-function bladder and rectum retractor during treatment. Our objective is to review salient techniques for OAR displacement, share our packing technique, and determine the reduction in dose to OAR and inter-fraction variability of dose to OAR, associated with speculum-based vaginal packing (SBVP) in comparison to conventional gauze packing during HDR-ICB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed HDR-ICB treatment plans for 45 patients, including 10 who underwent both conventional gauze packing and SBVP. Due to institutional inter-provider practice differences, patients non-selectively received either packing procedure. Packing was performed under conscious sedation, followed by cone beam computed tomography used for dosimetric planning. Maximum absolute and percent-of-prescription dose to the International Commission of Radiation Units bladder and rectal points in addition to D(0.1cc), D(1.0cc), and D(2.0cc) volumes of the bladder and rectum were analyzed and compared for each packing method using an independent sample t-test. RESULTS: Of the 179 fractions included, 73% and 27% used SBVP and gauze packing, respectively. For patients prescribed 6 Gy to point A, SBVP was associated with reduced mean D(0.1cc) bladder dose, inter-fraction variability in D(0.1cc) bladder dose by 9.3% (p = 0.026) and 9.0%, respectively, and statistically equivalent rectal D(0.1cc), D(1.0cc), and D(2.0cc). Patients prescribed 5.5 Gy or 5 Gy to point A after dose optimization, were less likely to benefit from SBVP. In the intra-patient comparison, 80% of patients had reduction in at least one rectum or bladder parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with conducive anatomy, SBVP is a cost-efficient packing method that is associated with improved bladder sparing and comparable rectal sparing relative to gauze packing during HDR-ICB without general anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5881598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58815982018-04-04 Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer Sud, Shivani Roth, Toni Jones, Ellen J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Intra-vaginal packing is used to fix the applicator and displace organs at risk (OAR) during high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy (HDR-ICB). We retain the speculum from applicator placement as a dual-function bladder and rectum retractor during treatment. Our objective is to review salient techniques for OAR displacement, share our packing technique, and determine the reduction in dose to OAR and inter-fraction variability of dose to OAR, associated with speculum-based vaginal packing (SBVP) in comparison to conventional gauze packing during HDR-ICB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed HDR-ICB treatment plans for 45 patients, including 10 who underwent both conventional gauze packing and SBVP. Due to institutional inter-provider practice differences, patients non-selectively received either packing procedure. Packing was performed under conscious sedation, followed by cone beam computed tomography used for dosimetric planning. Maximum absolute and percent-of-prescription dose to the International Commission of Radiation Units bladder and rectal points in addition to D(0.1cc), D(1.0cc), and D(2.0cc) volumes of the bladder and rectum were analyzed and compared for each packing method using an independent sample t-test. RESULTS: Of the 179 fractions included, 73% and 27% used SBVP and gauze packing, respectively. For patients prescribed 6 Gy to point A, SBVP was associated with reduced mean D(0.1cc) bladder dose, inter-fraction variability in D(0.1cc) bladder dose by 9.3% (p = 0.026) and 9.0%, respectively, and statistically equivalent rectal D(0.1cc), D(1.0cc), and D(2.0cc). Patients prescribed 5.5 Gy or 5 Gy to point A after dose optimization, were less likely to benefit from SBVP. In the intra-patient comparison, 80% of patients had reduction in at least one rectum or bladder parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with conducive anatomy, SBVP is a cost-efficient packing method that is associated with improved bladder sparing and comparable rectal sparing relative to gauze packing during HDR-ICB without general anesthesia. Termedia Publishing House 2018-02-28 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5881598/ /pubmed/29619054 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.74316 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sud, Shivani
Roth, Toni
Jones, Ellen
Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
title Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
title_full Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
title_fullStr Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
title_short Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
title_sort clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5881598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619054
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.74316
work_keys_str_mv AT sudshivani clinicalanalysisofspeculumbasedvaginalpackingforhighdoserateintracavitarytandemandovoidbrachytherapyincervicalcancer
AT rothtoni clinicalanalysisofspeculumbasedvaginalpackingforhighdoserateintracavitarytandemandovoidbrachytherapyincervicalcancer
AT jonesellen clinicalanalysisofspeculumbasedvaginalpackingforhighdoserateintracavitarytandemandovoidbrachytherapyincervicalcancer