Cargando…

Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information

OBJECTIVE. To evaluate 6 tertiary, point-of-care drug information resources’ dietary supplement content. METHODS. This was a cross-sectional evaluation of Lexicomp Natural Products Database, Micromedex Alternative Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology, Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montgomery, Ashley E., Beckett, Robert D., Montagano, Kaitlin J., Kutom, Samah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515690X18764844
_version_ 1783311397663277056
author Montgomery, Ashley E.
Beckett, Robert D.
Montagano, Kaitlin J.
Kutom, Samah
author_facet Montgomery, Ashley E.
Beckett, Robert D.
Montagano, Kaitlin J.
Kutom, Samah
author_sort Montgomery, Ashley E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. To evaluate 6 tertiary, point-of-care drug information resources’ dietary supplement content. METHODS. This was a cross-sectional evaluation of Lexicomp Natural Products Database, Micromedex Alternative Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology, Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products, and Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs. Each resource was evaluated for scope, completeness, consistency, and ease of use. RESULTS. For a sample of 66 supplements, scope scores ranged from 69.7% (Micromedex) to 100% (Natural Medicines). Completeness scores were high considering uses, dose, adverse effects, and mechanism (85.7% to 100%). Overall completeness scores ranged from 82.5% (Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs) to 100% (Clinical Pharmacology, Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products). Consistency scores ranged from 0% (Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs) to 100% (Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products). Mean time to locate and gather information was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS. Resources were similar for completeness and ease of use. Scope and consistency varied depending on the resource.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58820362019-09-10 Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information Montgomery, Ashley E. Beckett, Robert D. Montagano, Kaitlin J. Kutom, Samah J Evid Based Integr Med Original Article OBJECTIVE. To evaluate 6 tertiary, point-of-care drug information resources’ dietary supplement content. METHODS. This was a cross-sectional evaluation of Lexicomp Natural Products Database, Micromedex Alternative Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology, Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products, and Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs. Each resource was evaluated for scope, completeness, consistency, and ease of use. RESULTS. For a sample of 66 supplements, scope scores ranged from 69.7% (Micromedex) to 100% (Natural Medicines). Completeness scores were high considering uses, dose, adverse effects, and mechanism (85.7% to 100%). Overall completeness scores ranged from 82.5% (Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs) to 100% (Clinical Pharmacology, Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products). Consistency scores ranged from 0% (Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs) to 100% (Natural Medicines, The Review of Natural Products). Mean time to locate and gather information was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS. Resources were similar for completeness and ease of use. Scope and consistency varied depending on the resource. SAGE Publications 2018-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5882036/ /pubmed/29589473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515690X18764844 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Montgomery, Ashley E.
Beckett, Robert D.
Montagano, Kaitlin J.
Kutom, Samah
Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information
title Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information
title_full Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information
title_fullStr Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information
title_short Evaluation of Point-of-Care Resources for Dietary Supplement Information
title_sort evaluation of point-of-care resources for dietary supplement information
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515690X18764844
work_keys_str_mv AT montgomeryashleye evaluationofpointofcareresourcesfordietarysupplementinformation
AT beckettrobertd evaluationofpointofcareresourcesfordietarysupplementinformation
AT montaganokaitlinj evaluationofpointofcareresourcesfordietarysupplementinformation
AT kutomsamah evaluationofpointofcareresourcesfordietarysupplementinformation