Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest

INTRODUCTION: With osteoporosis on the rise across the United States, the goal of this prospective study is to determine the effectiveness of our Midwest level-1 trauma center in diagnosing, treating, and educating osteoporosis patients after fracture with the use of questionnaires. Secondarily, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Dharmik, Worley, John R., Volgas, David A., Crist, Brett D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459318765844
_version_ 1783311400941125632
author Patel, Dharmik
Worley, John R.
Volgas, David A.
Crist, Brett D.
author_facet Patel, Dharmik
Worley, John R.
Volgas, David A.
Crist, Brett D.
author_sort Patel, Dharmik
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With osteoporosis on the rise across the United States, the goal of this prospective study is to determine the effectiveness of our Midwest level-1 trauma center in diagnosing, treating, and educating osteoporosis patients after fracture with the use of questionnaires. Secondarily, we aimed to identify barriers that prevent our patients from complying with bone health recommendations. METHODS: One hundred participants (≥55 years) were given 2 questionnaires (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and a study-specific questionnaire) that were administered during the patient’s visit to the orthopedic trauma clinic. A group of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis was compared to a group of patients not diagnosed with osteoporosis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24 (IBM Corp, Chicago, Illinois). RESULTS: Patients who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis were significantly older (72.7 vs 66.5, P = .009) and more were women (86.2% vs 66.2%, P = .043). Significantly, fewer patients without the diagnosis of osteoporosis had a history of fragility fracture (56.3%) compared to 92.9% of those diagnosed with osteoporosis (P < .001). Of those with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) recommended by a healthcare provider, 20 (55.6%) of those without the diagnosis of osteoporosis and 13 (52%) of those with the diagnosis of osteoporosis had DXA screening before their fragility fracture (P = .499). More patients diagnosed with osteoporosis (93.1%) were taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation compared to 66.2% of those without the diagnosis of osteoporosis (P = .005). Only 37.9% of patients with the diagnosis of osteoporosis were receiving US Food and Drug Administration–approved medications for the management of their disease. DISCUSSION: In patients without previous osteoporosis diagnosis, 59 (83.1%) of the 71 claimed that they did not receive any preventative education about osteoporosis, while 21 (72.4%) of the 29 patients with the diagnosis of osteoporosis claimed that they did not receive a preventative education (P = .165). Both groups lacked optimum diagnosis, treatment, and education of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the need for a deliberate effort of a multidisciplinary team to focus efforts in all stages of osteoporosis management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58820692018-04-05 The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest Patel, Dharmik Worley, John R. Volgas, David A. Crist, Brett D. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Article INTRODUCTION: With osteoporosis on the rise across the United States, the goal of this prospective study is to determine the effectiveness of our Midwest level-1 trauma center in diagnosing, treating, and educating osteoporosis patients after fracture with the use of questionnaires. Secondarily, we aimed to identify barriers that prevent our patients from complying with bone health recommendations. METHODS: One hundred participants (≥55 years) were given 2 questionnaires (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and a study-specific questionnaire) that were administered during the patient’s visit to the orthopedic trauma clinic. A group of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis was compared to a group of patients not diagnosed with osteoporosis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24 (IBM Corp, Chicago, Illinois). RESULTS: Patients who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis were significantly older (72.7 vs 66.5, P = .009) and more were women (86.2% vs 66.2%, P = .043). Significantly, fewer patients without the diagnosis of osteoporosis had a history of fragility fracture (56.3%) compared to 92.9% of those diagnosed with osteoporosis (P < .001). Of those with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) recommended by a healthcare provider, 20 (55.6%) of those without the diagnosis of osteoporosis and 13 (52%) of those with the diagnosis of osteoporosis had DXA screening before their fragility fracture (P = .499). More patients diagnosed with osteoporosis (93.1%) were taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation compared to 66.2% of those without the diagnosis of osteoporosis (P = .005). Only 37.9% of patients with the diagnosis of osteoporosis were receiving US Food and Drug Administration–approved medications for the management of their disease. DISCUSSION: In patients without previous osteoporosis diagnosis, 59 (83.1%) of the 71 claimed that they did not receive any preventative education about osteoporosis, while 21 (72.4%) of the 29 patients with the diagnosis of osteoporosis claimed that they did not receive a preventative education (P = .165). Both groups lacked optimum diagnosis, treatment, and education of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the need for a deliberate effort of a multidisciplinary team to focus efforts in all stages of osteoporosis management. SAGE Publications 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5882069/ /pubmed/29623238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459318765844 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Dharmik
Worley, John R.
Volgas, David A.
Crist, Brett D.
The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest
title The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest
title_full The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest
title_short The Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment in the Midwest
title_sort effectiveness of osteoporosis screening and treatment in the midwest
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29623238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459318765844
work_keys_str_mv AT pateldharmik theeffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT worleyjohnr theeffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT volgasdavida theeffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT cristbrettd theeffectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT pateldharmik effectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT worleyjohnr effectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT volgasdavida effectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest
AT cristbrettd effectivenessofosteoporosisscreeningandtreatmentinthemidwest