Cargando…

Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China

We report on a study conducted in Guangdong Province, China, to characterize behaviors and perceptions associated with transmission of pathogens with pandemic potential in highly exposed human populations at the animal-human interface. A risk factor/exposure survey was administered to individuals wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monagin, Corina, Paccha, Blanca, Liang, Ning, Trufan, Sally, Zhou, Huiqiong, Wu, De, Schneider, Bradley S., Chmura, Aleksei, Epstein, Jonathan, Daszak, Peter, Ke, Changwen, Rabinowitz, Peter M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194647
_version_ 1783311413612118016
author Monagin, Corina
Paccha, Blanca
Liang, Ning
Trufan, Sally
Zhou, Huiqiong
Wu, De
Schneider, Bradley S.
Chmura, Aleksei
Epstein, Jonathan
Daszak, Peter
Ke, Changwen
Rabinowitz, Peter M.
author_facet Monagin, Corina
Paccha, Blanca
Liang, Ning
Trufan, Sally
Zhou, Huiqiong
Wu, De
Schneider, Bradley S.
Chmura, Aleksei
Epstein, Jonathan
Daszak, Peter
Ke, Changwen
Rabinowitz, Peter M.
author_sort Monagin, Corina
collection PubMed
description We report on a study conducted in Guangdong Province, China, to characterize behaviors and perceptions associated with transmission of pathogens with pandemic potential in highly exposed human populations at the animal-human interface. A risk factor/exposure survey was administered to individuals with high levels of exposure to wildlife. Serological testing was performed to evaluate prior infection with several wildlife viral pathogens. Follow up serology was performed on a subset of the cohort as well as close contacts of individuals. 1,312 individuals were enrolled in the study. Contact with a wide range of wildlife species was reported in both occupational and occasional contexts. The overall proportion of individuals seropositive to any of the tested wildlife pathogens was approximately 4.0%. However, persons employed as butchers demonstrated a seropositivity of 9.0% to at least one pathogen of interest. By contrast, individuals working as hunters had lower rates of seropositivity. Among the study population, a number of other behaviors showed correlation with seropositivity, including contact with particular wildlife species such as field rats. These results demonstrate the need to further explore zoonotic risks of particular activities regarding wildlife contact, and to better understand risks of persons working as butchers with wildlife species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58821292018-04-13 Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China Monagin, Corina Paccha, Blanca Liang, Ning Trufan, Sally Zhou, Huiqiong Wu, De Schneider, Bradley S. Chmura, Aleksei Epstein, Jonathan Daszak, Peter Ke, Changwen Rabinowitz, Peter M. PLoS One Research Article We report on a study conducted in Guangdong Province, China, to characterize behaviors and perceptions associated with transmission of pathogens with pandemic potential in highly exposed human populations at the animal-human interface. A risk factor/exposure survey was administered to individuals with high levels of exposure to wildlife. Serological testing was performed to evaluate prior infection with several wildlife viral pathogens. Follow up serology was performed on a subset of the cohort as well as close contacts of individuals. 1,312 individuals were enrolled in the study. Contact with a wide range of wildlife species was reported in both occupational and occasional contexts. The overall proportion of individuals seropositive to any of the tested wildlife pathogens was approximately 4.0%. However, persons employed as butchers demonstrated a seropositivity of 9.0% to at least one pathogen of interest. By contrast, individuals working as hunters had lower rates of seropositivity. Among the study population, a number of other behaviors showed correlation with seropositivity, including contact with particular wildlife species such as field rats. These results demonstrate the need to further explore zoonotic risks of particular activities regarding wildlife contact, and to better understand risks of persons working as butchers with wildlife species. Public Library of Science 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5882129/ /pubmed/29614074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194647 Text en © 2018 Monagin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Monagin, Corina
Paccha, Blanca
Liang, Ning
Trufan, Sally
Zhou, Huiqiong
Wu, De
Schneider, Bradley S.
Chmura, Aleksei
Epstein, Jonathan
Daszak, Peter
Ke, Changwen
Rabinowitz, Peter M.
Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China
title Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China
title_full Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China
title_fullStr Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China
title_full_unstemmed Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China
title_short Serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in China
title_sort serologic and behavioral risk survey of workers with wildlife contact in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194647
work_keys_str_mv AT monagincorina serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT pacchablanca serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT liangning serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT trufansally serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT zhouhuiqiong serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT wude serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT schneiderbradleys serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT chmuraaleksei serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT epsteinjonathan serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT daszakpeter serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT kechangwen serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina
AT rabinowitzpeterm serologicandbehavioralrisksurveyofworkerswithwildlifecontactinchina