Cargando…

Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Aspiration of subglottic secretion is a widely used intervention to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of continuous and intermittent subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) in preventing VAP. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujimoto, Hiroko, Yamaguchi, Osamu, Hayami, Hajime, Shimosaka, Mika, Tsuboi, Sayaka, Sato, Mitsunori, Takebayashi, Shigeo, Morita, Satoshi, Saito, Mari, Goto, Takahisa, Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662613
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24630
_version_ 1783311438893285376
author Fujimoto, Hiroko
Yamaguchi, Osamu
Hayami, Hajime
Shimosaka, Mika
Tsuboi, Sayaka
Sato, Mitsunori
Takebayashi, Shigeo
Morita, Satoshi
Saito, Mari
Goto, Takahisa
Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
author_facet Fujimoto, Hiroko
Yamaguchi, Osamu
Hayami, Hajime
Shimosaka, Mika
Tsuboi, Sayaka
Sato, Mitsunori
Takebayashi, Shigeo
Morita, Satoshi
Saito, Mari
Goto, Takahisa
Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
author_sort Fujimoto, Hiroko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Aspiration of subglottic secretion is a widely used intervention to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of continuous and intermittent subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) in preventing VAP. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted on adult postoperative patients who were expected to undergo mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Primary outcome measure was incidence of VAP and secondary outcome measures were length of mechanical ventilation and intensive-care unit (ICU) stay. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received continuous SSD, while 60 patients received intermittent SSD. Of these 119 patients, 88 (74%) were excluded and 15 and 16 patients were allocated to receive continuous and intermittent SSD, respectively. VAP was detected in 4 (26.7%) and 7 (43.8%) patients in the continuous and intermittent groups, respectively, (p=0.320). The length of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter (p=0.034) in the continuous group (99.5±47.1 h) than in the intermittent group (159.9±94.5 h). The length of ICU stay was also shorter (p=0.0097) in the continuous group (6.3±2.1 days) than the intermittent group (9.8±4.8 days). CONCLUSIONS: Although continuous SSD did not reduce the incidence of VAP, it reduced the length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay when compared to intermittent SSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58823042018-04-16 Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial Fujimoto, Hiroko Yamaguchi, Osamu Hayami, Hajime Shimosaka, Mika Tsuboi, Sayaka Sato, Mitsunori Takebayashi, Shigeo Morita, Satoshi Saito, Mari Goto, Takahisa Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Aspiration of subglottic secretion is a widely used intervention to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of continuous and intermittent subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) in preventing VAP. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted on adult postoperative patients who were expected to undergo mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Primary outcome measure was incidence of VAP and secondary outcome measures were length of mechanical ventilation and intensive-care unit (ICU) stay. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received continuous SSD, while 60 patients received intermittent SSD. Of these 119 patients, 88 (74%) were excluded and 15 and 16 patients were allocated to receive continuous and intermittent SSD, respectively. VAP was detected in 4 (26.7%) and 7 (43.8%) patients in the continuous and intermittent groups, respectively, (p=0.320). The length of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter (p=0.034) in the continuous group (99.5±47.1 h) than in the intermittent group (159.9±94.5 h). The length of ICU stay was also shorter (p=0.0097) in the continuous group (6.3±2.1 days) than the intermittent group (9.8±4.8 days). CONCLUSIONS: Although continuous SSD did not reduce the incidence of VAP, it reduced the length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay when compared to intermittent SSD. Impact Journals LLC 2018-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5882304/ /pubmed/29662613 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24630 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Fujimoto et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Fujimoto, Hiroko
Yamaguchi, Osamu
Hayami, Hajime
Shimosaka, Mika
Tsuboi, Sayaka
Sato, Mitsunori
Takebayashi, Shigeo
Morita, Satoshi
Saito, Mari
Goto, Takahisa
Kurahashi, Kiyoyasu
Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of continuous versus intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a single-center randomized controlled trial
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662613
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24630
work_keys_str_mv AT fujimotohiroko efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamaguchiosamu efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hayamihajime efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimosakamika efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsuboisayaka efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT satomitsunori efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takebayashishigeo efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moritasatoshi efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saitomari efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gototakahisa efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kurahashikiyoyasu efficacyofcontinuousversusintermittentsubglotticsecretiondrainageinpreventingventilatorassociatedpneumoniainpatientsrequiringmechanicalventilationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial