Cargando…

The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontopodis, Nikolaos, Tzirakis, Konstantinos, Ioannou, Christos V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682111
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115
_version_ 1783311450855440384
author Kontopodis, Nikolaos
Tzirakis, Konstantinos
Ioannou, Christos V
author_facet Kontopodis, Nikolaos
Tzirakis, Konstantinos
Ioannou, Christos V
author_sort Kontopodis, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point throughout the aneurysmal surface, has been proven superior in predicting the rupture risk of AAAs, and its value is being increasingly recognized among physicians. More recently, hemodynamic indices, such as flow-induced wall shear stresses, have been indicated as potentially significant determinants of AAA natural history. Ultimately, a statistical model that takes into account all these factors may be relevant for making a sound prediction of the rupture risk of aneurysms and optimizing the management of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58823552018-04-20 The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Kontopodis, Nikolaos Tzirakis, Konstantinos Ioannou, Christos V Ann Vasc Dis Review Article Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point throughout the aneurysmal surface, has been proven superior in predicting the rupture risk of AAAs, and its value is being increasingly recognized among physicians. More recently, hemodynamic indices, such as flow-induced wall shear stresses, have been indicated as potentially significant determinants of AAA natural history. Ultimately, a statistical model that takes into account all these factors may be relevant for making a sound prediction of the rupture risk of aneurysms and optimizing the management of these patients. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2018-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5882355/ /pubmed/29682111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kontopodis, Nikolaos
Tzirakis, Konstantinos
Ioannou, Christos V
The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_full The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_fullStr The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_short The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
title_sort obsolete maximum diameter criterion, the evident role of biomechanical (pressure) indices, the new role of hemodynamic (flow) indices, and the multi-modal approach to the rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682111
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115
work_keys_str_mv AT kontopodisnikolaos theobsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT tzirakiskonstantinos theobsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT ioannouchristosv theobsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT kontopodisnikolaos obsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT tzirakiskonstantinos obsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms
AT ioannouchristosv obsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms