Cargando…
The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point thr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115 |
_version_ | 1783311450855440384 |
---|---|
author | Kontopodis, Nikolaos Tzirakis, Konstantinos Ioannou, Christos V |
author_facet | Kontopodis, Nikolaos Tzirakis, Konstantinos Ioannou, Christos V |
author_sort | Kontopodis, Nikolaos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point throughout the aneurysmal surface, has been proven superior in predicting the rupture risk of AAAs, and its value is being increasingly recognized among physicians. More recently, hemodynamic indices, such as flow-induced wall shear stresses, have been indicated as potentially significant determinants of AAA natural history. Ultimately, a statistical model that takes into account all these factors may be relevant for making a sound prediction of the rupture risk of aneurysms and optimizing the management of these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5882355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58823552018-04-20 The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Kontopodis, Nikolaos Tzirakis, Konstantinos Ioannou, Christos V Ann Vasc Dis Review Article Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point throughout the aneurysmal surface, has been proven superior in predicting the rupture risk of AAAs, and its value is being increasingly recognized among physicians. More recently, hemodynamic indices, such as flow-induced wall shear stresses, have been indicated as potentially significant determinants of AAA natural history. Ultimately, a statistical model that takes into account all these factors may be relevant for making a sound prediction of the rupture risk of aneurysms and optimizing the management of these patients. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2018-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5882355/ /pubmed/29682111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Kontopodis, Nikolaos Tzirakis, Konstantinos Ioannou, Christos V The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms |
title | The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms |
title_full | The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms |
title_fullStr | The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms |
title_full_unstemmed | The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms |
title_short | The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms |
title_sort | obsolete maximum diameter criterion, the evident role of biomechanical (pressure) indices, the new role of hemodynamic (flow) indices, and the multi-modal approach to the rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29682111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.17-00115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kontopodisnikolaos theobsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms AT tzirakiskonstantinos theobsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms AT ioannouchristosv theobsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms AT kontopodisnikolaos obsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms AT tzirakiskonstantinos obsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms AT ioannouchristosv obsoletemaximumdiametercriteriontheevidentroleofbiomechanicalpressureindicesthenewroleofhemodynamicflowindicesandthemultimodalapproachtotheruptureriskassessmentofabdominalaorticaneurysms |