Cargando…
Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
Introduction To prevent or diminish pulmonary problems in laryngectomized patients, continuous use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) is recommended. Therefore, automatic speaking valves are also often combined with an HME to enable hands-free speech. In order to keep these devices in place, mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603921 |
_version_ | 1783311455994511360 |
---|---|
author | Lansaat, Liset Kleijn, Bertram de Hilgers, Frans Laan, Bernard van der Brekel, Michiel van den |
author_facet | Lansaat, Liset Kleijn, Bertram de Hilgers, Frans Laan, Bernard van der Brekel, Michiel van den |
author_sort | Lansaat, Liset |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction To prevent or diminish pulmonary problems in laryngectomized patients, continuous use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) is recommended. Therefore, automatic speaking valves are also often combined with an HME to enable hands-free speech. In order to keep these devices in place, most commonly, peristomal patches are used. Objective This prospective clinical 2 × 2 crossover study aims at assessing the added value of a new patch for HME application, the Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm (SBO). The device combines the stable and conical base of the Provox StabiliBase with the skin-friendlier hydrocolloid Provox OptiDerm (OD) patch. Methods Thirty-two laryngectomized patients were included in this multicenter study. Participants were asked to compare SBO to OD, and to the patch they normally use. The primary outcome measure was patient preference. Results Overall, 60% of the participants had preference for their normally used patch, 23% preferred the SBO and 17% indicated no preference. When comparing the SBO to the OD, 43% preferred the SBO, 40% the OD and 17% had no preference. Conclusion Most patients preferred their normally used patch and SBO was favored by a subgroup. Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm seems to be a valuable addition to the existing patches and further increases patients' options for HME application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5882377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58823772018-04-04 Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy Lansaat, Liset Kleijn, Bertram de Hilgers, Frans Laan, Bernard van der Brekel, Michiel van den Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction To prevent or diminish pulmonary problems in laryngectomized patients, continuous use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) is recommended. Therefore, automatic speaking valves are also often combined with an HME to enable hands-free speech. In order to keep these devices in place, most commonly, peristomal patches are used. Objective This prospective clinical 2 × 2 crossover study aims at assessing the added value of a new patch for HME application, the Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm (SBO). The device combines the stable and conical base of the Provox StabiliBase with the skin-friendlier hydrocolloid Provox OptiDerm (OD) patch. Methods Thirty-two laryngectomized patients were included in this multicenter study. Participants were asked to compare SBO to OD, and to the patch they normally use. The primary outcome measure was patient preference. Results Overall, 60% of the participants had preference for their normally used patch, 23% preferred the SBO and 17% indicated no preference. When comparing the SBO to the OD, 43% preferred the SBO, 40% the OD and 17% had no preference. Conclusion Most patients preferred their normally used patch and SBO was favored by a subgroup. Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm seems to be a valuable addition to the existing patches and further increases patients' options for HME application. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-04 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5882377/ /pubmed/29619100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603921 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Lansaat, Liset Kleijn, Bertram de Hilgers, Frans Laan, Bernard van der Brekel, Michiel van den Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy |
title | Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy |
title_full | Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy |
title_short | Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy |
title_sort | comparative study between peristomal patches in patients with definitive tracheostomy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lansaatliset comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy AT kleijnbertramde comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy AT hilgersfrans comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy AT laanbernardvander comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy AT brekelmichielvanden comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy |