Cargando…

Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy

Introduction  To prevent or diminish pulmonary problems in laryngectomized patients, continuous use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) is recommended. Therefore, automatic speaking valves are also often combined with an HME to enable hands-free speech. In order to keep these devices in place, mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lansaat, Liset, Kleijn, Bertram de, Hilgers, Frans, Laan, Bernard van der, Brekel, Michiel van den
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603921
_version_ 1783311455994511360
author Lansaat, Liset
Kleijn, Bertram de
Hilgers, Frans
Laan, Bernard van der
Brekel, Michiel van den
author_facet Lansaat, Liset
Kleijn, Bertram de
Hilgers, Frans
Laan, Bernard van der
Brekel, Michiel van den
author_sort Lansaat, Liset
collection PubMed
description Introduction  To prevent or diminish pulmonary problems in laryngectomized patients, continuous use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) is recommended. Therefore, automatic speaking valves are also often combined with an HME to enable hands-free speech. In order to keep these devices in place, most commonly, peristomal patches are used. Objective  This prospective clinical 2 × 2 crossover study aims at assessing the added value of a new patch for HME application, the Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm (SBO). The device combines the stable and conical base of the Provox StabiliBase with the skin-friendlier hydrocolloid Provox OptiDerm (OD) patch. Methods  Thirty-two laryngectomized patients were included in this multicenter study. Participants were asked to compare SBO to OD, and to the patch they normally use. The primary outcome measure was patient preference. Results  Overall, 60% of the participants had preference for their normally used patch, 23% preferred the SBO and 17% indicated no preference. When comparing the SBO to the OD, 43% preferred the SBO, 40% the OD and 17% had no preference. Conclusion  Most patients preferred their normally used patch and SBO was favored by a subgroup. Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm seems to be a valuable addition to the existing patches and further increases patients' options for HME application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58823772018-04-04 Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy Lansaat, Liset Kleijn, Bertram de Hilgers, Frans Laan, Bernard van der Brekel, Michiel van den Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  To prevent or diminish pulmonary problems in laryngectomized patients, continuous use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) is recommended. Therefore, automatic speaking valves are also often combined with an HME to enable hands-free speech. In order to keep these devices in place, most commonly, peristomal patches are used. Objective  This prospective clinical 2 × 2 crossover study aims at assessing the added value of a new patch for HME application, the Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm (SBO). The device combines the stable and conical base of the Provox StabiliBase with the skin-friendlier hydrocolloid Provox OptiDerm (OD) patch. Methods  Thirty-two laryngectomized patients were included in this multicenter study. Participants were asked to compare SBO to OD, and to the patch they normally use. The primary outcome measure was patient preference. Results  Overall, 60% of the participants had preference for their normally used patch, 23% preferred the SBO and 17% indicated no preference. When comparing the SBO to the OD, 43% preferred the SBO, 40% the OD and 17% had no preference. Conclusion  Most patients preferred their normally used patch and SBO was favored by a subgroup. Provox StabiliBase OptiDerm seems to be a valuable addition to the existing patches and further increases patients' options for HME application. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-04 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5882377/ /pubmed/29619100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603921 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Lansaat, Liset
Kleijn, Bertram de
Hilgers, Frans
Laan, Bernard van der
Brekel, Michiel van den
Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
title Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
title_full Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
title_fullStr Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
title_short Comparative Study Between Peristomal Patches in Patients with Definitive Tracheostomy
title_sort comparative study between peristomal patches in patients with definitive tracheostomy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603921
work_keys_str_mv AT lansaatliset comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy
AT kleijnbertramde comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy
AT hilgersfrans comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy
AT laanbernardvander comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy
AT brekelmichielvanden comparativestudybetweenperistomalpatchesinpatientswithdefinitivetracheostomy