Cargando…

Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The incidence of tumors located in the upper third of the stomach is increasing, and the use of radical proximal gastrectomy is becoming prevalent. After a proximal gastrectomy, various reconstructions are performed, but surgical outcomes are controversial. This study was performed to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shiqi, Lin, Shang, Wang, Hu, Yang, Jianjun, Yu, Pengfei, Zhao, Qingchuan, Li, Mengbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010121
_version_ 1783311459951837184
author Wang, Shiqi
Lin, Shang
Wang, Hu
Yang, Jianjun
Yu, Pengfei
Zhao, Qingchuan
Li, Mengbin
author_facet Wang, Shiqi
Lin, Shang
Wang, Hu
Yang, Jianjun
Yu, Pengfei
Zhao, Qingchuan
Li, Mengbin
author_sort Wang, Shiqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of tumors located in the upper third of the stomach is increasing, and the use of radical proximal gastrectomy is becoming prevalent. After a proximal gastrectomy, various reconstructions are performed, but surgical outcomes are controversial. This study was performed to review clinical outcomes of reconstructions after proximal gastrectomy. METHODS: Inclusion criteria focused on postoperative complications of patients who underwent a proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Exclusion criteria were case reports; targeted data not investigated; a duplicate study reported in a larger cohort; esophageal sphincter preservation surgery; near-total gastrectomy; recurrence of tumor; and combined organ resection. RESULTS: In total, 22 retrospective and 2 prospective studies were included. The studies investigated surgical outcomes of esophagogastrostomy (n = 10), jejunal interposition (n = 12), jejunal pouch interposition (n = 7), double tract jejunal interposition (n = 1), and tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy (n = 5). Pooled incidences of reflux esophagitis or reflux symptoms for these procedures were 28.6%, 4.5%, 12.9%, 4.7%, and 10.7%, respectively. Incidences of postoperative complications were 9.5%, 18.1%, 7.0%, 11.6%, and 9.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing operation complexity, which perhaps increased the risk of other postoperative complications, currently used reconstructions present excellent anti-reflux efficacy. However, the optimal reconstruction method remains to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58823942018-04-11 Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review Wang, Shiqi Lin, Shang Wang, Hu Yang, Jianjun Yu, Pengfei Zhao, Qingchuan Li, Mengbin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: The incidence of tumors located in the upper third of the stomach is increasing, and the use of radical proximal gastrectomy is becoming prevalent. After a proximal gastrectomy, various reconstructions are performed, but surgical outcomes are controversial. This study was performed to review clinical outcomes of reconstructions after proximal gastrectomy. METHODS: Inclusion criteria focused on postoperative complications of patients who underwent a proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Exclusion criteria were case reports; targeted data not investigated; a duplicate study reported in a larger cohort; esophageal sphincter preservation surgery; near-total gastrectomy; recurrence of tumor; and combined organ resection. RESULTS: In total, 22 retrospective and 2 prospective studies were included. The studies investigated surgical outcomes of esophagogastrostomy (n = 10), jejunal interposition (n = 12), jejunal pouch interposition (n = 7), double tract jejunal interposition (n = 1), and tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy (n = 5). Pooled incidences of reflux esophagitis or reflux symptoms for these procedures were 28.6%, 4.5%, 12.9%, 4.7%, and 10.7%, respectively. Incidences of postoperative complications were 9.5%, 18.1%, 7.0%, 11.6%, and 9.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing operation complexity, which perhaps increased the risk of other postoperative complications, currently used reconstructions present excellent anti-reflux efficacy. However, the optimal reconstruction method remains to be determined. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5882394/ /pubmed/29538208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010121 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Wang, Shiqi
Lin, Shang
Wang, Hu
Yang, Jianjun
Yu, Pengfei
Zhao, Qingchuan
Li, Mengbin
Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
title Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
title_full Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
title_fullStr Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
title_short Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
title_sort reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010121
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshiqi reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview
AT linshang reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview
AT wanghu reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview
AT yangjianjun reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview
AT yupengfei reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview
AT zhaoqingchuan reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview
AT limengbin reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview