Cargando…
Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The incidence of tumors located in the upper third of the stomach is increasing, and the use of radical proximal gastrectomy is becoming prevalent. After a proximal gastrectomy, various reconstructions are performed, but surgical outcomes are controversial. This study was performed to re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010121 |
_version_ | 1783311459951837184 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shiqi Lin, Shang Wang, Hu Yang, Jianjun Yu, Pengfei Zhao, Qingchuan Li, Mengbin |
author_facet | Wang, Shiqi Lin, Shang Wang, Hu Yang, Jianjun Yu, Pengfei Zhao, Qingchuan Li, Mengbin |
author_sort | Wang, Shiqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The incidence of tumors located in the upper third of the stomach is increasing, and the use of radical proximal gastrectomy is becoming prevalent. After a proximal gastrectomy, various reconstructions are performed, but surgical outcomes are controversial. This study was performed to review clinical outcomes of reconstructions after proximal gastrectomy. METHODS: Inclusion criteria focused on postoperative complications of patients who underwent a proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Exclusion criteria were case reports; targeted data not investigated; a duplicate study reported in a larger cohort; esophageal sphincter preservation surgery; near-total gastrectomy; recurrence of tumor; and combined organ resection. RESULTS: In total, 22 retrospective and 2 prospective studies were included. The studies investigated surgical outcomes of esophagogastrostomy (n = 10), jejunal interposition (n = 12), jejunal pouch interposition (n = 7), double tract jejunal interposition (n = 1), and tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy (n = 5). Pooled incidences of reflux esophagitis or reflux symptoms for these procedures were 28.6%, 4.5%, 12.9%, 4.7%, and 10.7%, respectively. Incidences of postoperative complications were 9.5%, 18.1%, 7.0%, 11.6%, and 9.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing operation complexity, which perhaps increased the risk of other postoperative complications, currently used reconstructions present excellent anti-reflux efficacy. However, the optimal reconstruction method remains to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5882394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58823942018-04-11 Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review Wang, Shiqi Lin, Shang Wang, Hu Yang, Jianjun Yu, Pengfei Zhao, Qingchuan Li, Mengbin Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: The incidence of tumors located in the upper third of the stomach is increasing, and the use of radical proximal gastrectomy is becoming prevalent. After a proximal gastrectomy, various reconstructions are performed, but surgical outcomes are controversial. This study was performed to review clinical outcomes of reconstructions after proximal gastrectomy. METHODS: Inclusion criteria focused on postoperative complications of patients who underwent a proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Exclusion criteria were case reports; targeted data not investigated; a duplicate study reported in a larger cohort; esophageal sphincter preservation surgery; near-total gastrectomy; recurrence of tumor; and combined organ resection. RESULTS: In total, 22 retrospective and 2 prospective studies were included. The studies investigated surgical outcomes of esophagogastrostomy (n = 10), jejunal interposition (n = 12), jejunal pouch interposition (n = 7), double tract jejunal interposition (n = 1), and tube-like stomach esophagogastrostomy (n = 5). Pooled incidences of reflux esophagitis or reflux symptoms for these procedures were 28.6%, 4.5%, 12.9%, 4.7%, and 10.7%, respectively. Incidences of postoperative complications were 9.5%, 18.1%, 7.0%, 11.6%, and 9.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing operation complexity, which perhaps increased the risk of other postoperative complications, currently used reconstructions present excellent anti-reflux efficacy. However, the optimal reconstruction method remains to be determined. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5882394/ /pubmed/29538208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010121 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Wang, Shiqi Lin, Shang Wang, Hu Yang, Jianjun Yu, Pengfei Zhao, Qingchuan Li, Mengbin Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review |
title | Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review |
title_full | Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review |
title_short | Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: A systematic review |
title_sort | reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshiqi reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview AT linshang reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview AT wanghu reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview AT yangjianjun reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview AT yupengfei reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview AT zhaoqingchuan reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview AT limengbin reconstructionmethodsafterradicalproximalgastrectomyasystematicreview |