Cargando…

Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems

Deployable medical systems(DEPMEDS) patient conditions (PCs) and Military Combat Injury Scale (MCIS) are 2 important military medical coding systems. However, both of them have defects when applied in military medical planning. Although each PC code contains information about treatment, intensity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Pengwei, Chen, Fuxing, Chang, Wang, Xie, Tai, Liu, Jinhui, An, Zhiping, Chen, Guoliang, Liu, Xiaorong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29517681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010096
_version_ 1783311471934963712
author Hu, Pengwei
Chen, Fuxing
Chang, Wang
Xie, Tai
Liu, Jinhui
An, Zhiping
Chen, Guoliang
Liu, Xiaorong
author_facet Hu, Pengwei
Chen, Fuxing
Chang, Wang
Xie, Tai
Liu, Jinhui
An, Zhiping
Chen, Guoliang
Liu, Xiaorong
author_sort Hu, Pengwei
collection PubMed
description Deployable medical systems(DEPMEDS) patient conditions (PCs) and Military Combat Injury Scale (MCIS) are 2 important military medical coding systems. However, both of them have defects when applied in military medical planning. Although each PC code contains information about treatment, intensity of care, treatment time, length of stay, and probability of disposition that is relevant to simulation, its description is too comprehensive and ambiguous to code historical military medical records. Therefore, conversion between PC and other medical coding systems applied in standard medical data is required when validity is required following simulation. The information linked to each PC code is based on subject matter expert opinion instead of standard medical data from the theater that need to be continuously updated depending on the results of medical data analysis. MCIS, a combat-related injury coding system, shows significant promise in coding real medical data, but it does not seek detailed information important for prediction and simulation unlike PCs. Therefore, MCIS cannot be used in planning tools directly. Thus, the effort to map MCIS to PCs is significant for medical logistic planning. We aim to identify whether conversion between PCs and MCIS is possible and to evaluate inter-coder reliability. Three senior coders assigned all possible MCIS codes to 187 combat-related PC codes. The data records were structured based on an earlier study. Inter-rater reliability was measured by using Cohen's k statistic and percent agreement. Low inter-rater reliability indicated the difficulty in conversion between PCs and MCIS. The injury descriptors of PCs should be expanded by referring to new standard medical data. The existing MCIS codes need to be modified to include more information on treatment brief, treatment time, length of stay, and other key information, and historical data statistics need to be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58824462018-04-11 Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems Hu, Pengwei Chen, Fuxing Chang, Wang Xie, Tai Liu, Jinhui An, Zhiping Chen, Guoliang Liu, Xiaorong Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 Deployable medical systems(DEPMEDS) patient conditions (PCs) and Military Combat Injury Scale (MCIS) are 2 important military medical coding systems. However, both of them have defects when applied in military medical planning. Although each PC code contains information about treatment, intensity of care, treatment time, length of stay, and probability of disposition that is relevant to simulation, its description is too comprehensive and ambiguous to code historical military medical records. Therefore, conversion between PC and other medical coding systems applied in standard medical data is required when validity is required following simulation. The information linked to each PC code is based on subject matter expert opinion instead of standard medical data from the theater that need to be continuously updated depending on the results of medical data analysis. MCIS, a combat-related injury coding system, shows significant promise in coding real medical data, but it does not seek detailed information important for prediction and simulation unlike PCs. Therefore, MCIS cannot be used in planning tools directly. Thus, the effort to map MCIS to PCs is significant for medical logistic planning. We aim to identify whether conversion between PCs and MCIS is possible and to evaluate inter-coder reliability. Three senior coders assigned all possible MCIS codes to 187 combat-related PC codes. The data records were structured based on an earlier study. Inter-rater reliability was measured by using Cohen's k statistic and percent agreement. Low inter-rater reliability indicated the difficulty in conversion between PCs and MCIS. The injury descriptors of PCs should be expanded by referring to new standard medical data. The existing MCIS codes need to be modified to include more information on treatment brief, treatment time, length of stay, and other key information, and historical data statistics need to be developed. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5882446/ /pubmed/29517681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010096 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5400
Hu, Pengwei
Chen, Fuxing
Chang, Wang
Xie, Tai
Liu, Jinhui
An, Zhiping
Chen, Guoliang
Liu, Xiaorong
Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
title Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
title_full Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
title_fullStr Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
title_full_unstemmed Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
title_short Conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
title_sort conversion between 2 military combat-related injury coding systems
topic 5400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29517681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010096
work_keys_str_mv AT hupengwei conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT chenfuxing conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT changwang conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT xietai conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT liujinhui conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT anzhiping conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT chenguoliang conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems
AT liuxiaorong conversionbetween2militarycombatrelatedinjurycodingsystems