Cargando…

Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway

BACKGROUND: Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-García, Miguel, Santos, Passio, Rodríguez-Trigo, Gema, Martínez-Sagasti, Fernando, Fariña-González, Tomás, del Pino-Ramírez, Ángela, Cardenal-Sánchez, Carlos, Busto-González, Beatriz, Requesens-Solera, Mónica, Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes, Romero-Romero, Francisco, Núñez-Reiz, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0173-6
_version_ 1783311479202643968
author Sánchez-García, Miguel
Santos, Passio
Rodríguez-Trigo, Gema
Martínez-Sagasti, Fernando
Fariña-González, Tomás
del Pino-Ramírez, Ángela
Cardenal-Sánchez, Carlos
Busto-González, Beatriz
Requesens-Solera, Mónica
Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes
Romero-Romero, Francisco
Núñez-Reiz, Antonio
author_facet Sánchez-García, Miguel
Santos, Passio
Rodríguez-Trigo, Gema
Martínez-Sagasti, Fernando
Fariña-González, Tomás
del Pino-Ramírez, Ángela
Cardenal-Sánchez, Carlos
Busto-González, Beatriz
Requesens-Solera, Mónica
Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes
Romero-Romero, Francisco
Núñez-Reiz, Antonio
author_sort Sánchez-García, Miguel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance. METHODS: We applied insufflation of 50 cmH(2)O for 3 s and exsufflation of − 45 cmH(2)O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death. RESULTS: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58824792018-04-11 Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway Sánchez-García, Miguel Santos, Passio Rodríguez-Trigo, Gema Martínez-Sagasti, Fernando Fariña-González, Tomás del Pino-Ramírez, Ángela Cardenal-Sánchez, Carlos Busto-González, Beatriz Requesens-Solera, Mónica Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes Romero-Romero, Francisco Núñez-Reiz, Antonio Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance. METHODS: We applied insufflation of 50 cmH(2)O for 3 s and exsufflation of − 45 cmH(2)O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death. RESULTS: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register). Springer International Publishing 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5882479/ /pubmed/29616357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0173-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Sánchez-García, Miguel
Santos, Passio
Rodríguez-Trigo, Gema
Martínez-Sagasti, Fernando
Fariña-González, Tomás
del Pino-Ramírez, Ángela
Cardenal-Sánchez, Carlos
Busto-González, Beatriz
Requesens-Solera, Mónica
Nieto-Cabrera, Mercedes
Romero-Romero, Francisco
Núñez-Reiz, Antonio
Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
title Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
title_full Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
title_fullStr Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
title_short Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
title_sort preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0173-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezgarciamiguel preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT santospassio preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT rodrigueztrigogema preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT martinezsagastifernando preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT farinagonzaleztomas preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT delpinoramirezangela preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT cardenalsanchezcarlos preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT bustogonzalezbeatriz preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT requesenssoleramonica preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT nietocabreramercedes preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT romeroromerofrancisco preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway
AT nunezreizantonio preliminaryexperienceonthesafetyandtolerabilityofmechanicalinsufflationexsufflationinsubjectswithartificialairway