Cargando…
Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5136-x |
_version_ | 1783311482248757248 |
---|---|
author | Goense, Lucas Meziani, Jihane van Rossum, Peter S. N. Wessels, Frank J. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. van Hillegersberg, Richard Ruurda, Jelle P. |
author_facet | Goense, Lucas Meziani, Jihane van Rossum, Peter S. N. Wessels, Frank J. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. van Hillegersberg, Richard Ruurda, Jelle P. |
author_sort | Goense, Lucas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and (18)F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard. RESULTS: The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59–94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85–95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50–88%) and 84% (95% CI 77–90%), respectively. In patients with a negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases. • PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography. • Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary. • Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5882618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58826182018-04-05 Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer Goense, Lucas Meziani, Jihane van Rossum, Peter S. N. Wessels, Frank J. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. van Hillegersberg, Richard Ruurda, Jelle P. Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVES: To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and (18)F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard. RESULTS: The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59–94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85–95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50–88%) and 84% (95% CI 77–90%), respectively. In patients with a negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases. • PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography. • Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary. • Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-12-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5882618/ /pubmed/29218619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5136-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Goense, Lucas Meziani, Jihane van Rossum, Peter S. N. Wessels, Frank J. Lam, Marnix G. E. H. van Hillegersberg, Richard Ruurda, Jelle P. Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
title | Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
title_full | Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
title_fullStr | Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
title_short | Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
title_sort | cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative (18)f-fdg pet/ct scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer |
topic | Gastrointestinal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5136-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goenselucas cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer AT mezianijihane cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer AT vanrossumpetersn cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer AT wesselsfrankj cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer AT lammarnixgeh cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer AT vanhillegersbergrichard cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer AT ruurdajellep cervicalultrasonographyhasnoadditionalvalueovernegative18ffdgpetctscansfordiagnosingcervicallymphnodemetastasesinpatientswithoesophagealcancer |