Cargando…
Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5127-y |
_version_ | 1783311482484686848 |
---|---|
author | Spick, Claudio Bickel, Hubert Polanec, Stephan H. Baltzer, Pascal A. |
author_facet | Spick, Claudio Bickel, Hubert Polanec, Stephan H. Baltzer, Pascal A. |
author_sort | Spick, Claudio |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI. Two independent reviewers performed a literature review and data extraction. Data collection included study characteristics, number/type of BI-RADS 3 lesions, final diagnosis (histopathology and/or follow-up). Sources of bias (QUADAS-2) were assessed. Meta-analysis included data-pooling, heterogeneity testing, and meta-regression. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence was reported in 11 studies (range: 1.2-24.3%). Malignancy rates ranged between 0.5-10.1% (pooled 61/2814, 1.6%, 95%-CI:0.9-2.3% (random-effects-model), I(2)=53%, P=0.007). In a subgroup of 11 studies (2183 lesions), highest malignancy rates were observed in non-mass lesions (pooled 25/714, 2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%, I(2)=52%, P=0.021) followed by mass lesions (pooled 15/771, 1.5%, 95%-CI:0.7-2.4%, I(2)=0%, P=0.929), and foci (pooled 10/698, 1%, 95%-CI:0.3-1.7%, I(2)=0%, P=0.800). There was non-significant negative association between prevalence and malignancy rates (P=0.077). Malignant lesions were diagnosed at all follow-up time points. CONCLUSION: While prevalence of MRI BI-RADS 3 lesions was strongly heterogeneous, pooled malignancy rates met BI-RADS benchmarks (<2%). Malignancy rates varied, exceeding 2% in non-mass lesions. Twenty-four-month surveillance is required to detect all malignant lesions. KEY POINTS: • Probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions showed a pooled malignancy-rate of 1.6% (95%-CI:0.9-2.3%). • Malignancy rates differ and are highest in non-mass lesions (2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%). • The prevalence of BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI ranged from 1.2-24.3%. • Malignant lesions were diagnosed at follow-up time points up to 24 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5882619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58826192018-04-05 Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis Spick, Claudio Bickel, Hubert Polanec, Stephan H. Baltzer, Pascal A. Eur Radiol Breast PURPOSE: To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI. Two independent reviewers performed a literature review and data extraction. Data collection included study characteristics, number/type of BI-RADS 3 lesions, final diagnosis (histopathology and/or follow-up). Sources of bias (QUADAS-2) were assessed. Meta-analysis included data-pooling, heterogeneity testing, and meta-regression. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence was reported in 11 studies (range: 1.2-24.3%). Malignancy rates ranged between 0.5-10.1% (pooled 61/2814, 1.6%, 95%-CI:0.9-2.3% (random-effects-model), I(2)=53%, P=0.007). In a subgroup of 11 studies (2183 lesions), highest malignancy rates were observed in non-mass lesions (pooled 25/714, 2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%, I(2)=52%, P=0.021) followed by mass lesions (pooled 15/771, 1.5%, 95%-CI:0.7-2.4%, I(2)=0%, P=0.929), and foci (pooled 10/698, 1%, 95%-CI:0.3-1.7%, I(2)=0%, P=0.800). There was non-significant negative association between prevalence and malignancy rates (P=0.077). Malignant lesions were diagnosed at all follow-up time points. CONCLUSION: While prevalence of MRI BI-RADS 3 lesions was strongly heterogeneous, pooled malignancy rates met BI-RADS benchmarks (<2%). Malignancy rates varied, exceeding 2% in non-mass lesions. Twenty-four-month surveillance is required to detect all malignant lesions. KEY POINTS: • Probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions showed a pooled malignancy-rate of 1.6% (95%-CI:0.9-2.3%). • Malignancy rates differ and are highest in non-mass lesions (2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%). • The prevalence of BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI ranged from 1.2-24.3%. • Malignant lesions were diagnosed at follow-up time points up to 24 months. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-11-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5882619/ /pubmed/29168006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5127-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Breast Spick, Claudio Bickel, Hubert Polanec, Stephan H. Baltzer, Pascal A. Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | breast lesions classified as probably benign (bi-rads 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5127-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spickclaudio breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bickelhubert breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT polanecstephanh breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baltzerpascala breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |