Cargando…

Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spick, Claudio, Bickel, Hubert, Polanec, Stephan H., Baltzer, Pascal A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5127-y
_version_ 1783311482484686848
author Spick, Claudio
Bickel, Hubert
Polanec, Stephan H.
Baltzer, Pascal A.
author_facet Spick, Claudio
Bickel, Hubert
Polanec, Stephan H.
Baltzer, Pascal A.
author_sort Spick, Claudio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI. Two independent reviewers performed a literature review and data extraction. Data collection included study characteristics, number/type of BI-RADS 3 lesions, final diagnosis (histopathology and/or follow-up). Sources of bias (QUADAS-2) were assessed. Meta-analysis included data-pooling, heterogeneity testing, and meta-regression. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence was reported in 11 studies (range: 1.2-24.3%). Malignancy rates ranged between 0.5-10.1% (pooled 61/2814, 1.6%, 95%-CI:0.9-2.3% (random-effects-model), I(2)=53%, P=0.007). In a subgroup of 11 studies (2183 lesions), highest malignancy rates were observed in non-mass lesions (pooled 25/714, 2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%, I(2)=52%, P=0.021) followed by mass lesions (pooled 15/771, 1.5%, 95%-CI:0.7-2.4%, I(2)=0%, P=0.929), and foci (pooled 10/698, 1%, 95%-CI:0.3-1.7%, I(2)=0%, P=0.800). There was non-significant negative association between prevalence and malignancy rates (P=0.077). Malignant lesions were diagnosed at all follow-up time points. CONCLUSION: While prevalence of MRI BI-RADS 3 lesions was strongly heterogeneous, pooled malignancy rates met BI-RADS benchmarks (<2%). Malignancy rates varied, exceeding 2% in non-mass lesions. Twenty-four-month surveillance is required to detect all malignant lesions. KEY POINTS: • Probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions showed a pooled malignancy-rate of 1.6% (95%-CI:0.9-2.3%). • Malignancy rates differ and are highest in non-mass lesions (2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%). • The prevalence of BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI ranged from 1.2-24.3%. • Malignant lesions were diagnosed at follow-up time points up to 24 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5882619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58826192018-04-05 Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis Spick, Claudio Bickel, Hubert Polanec, Stephan H. Baltzer, Pascal A. Eur Radiol Breast PURPOSE: To investigate prevalence, malignancy rates, imaging features, and follow-up intervals for probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A systematic database-review of articles published through 22/06/2016 was performed. Eligible studies reported BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI. Two independent reviewers performed a literature review and data extraction. Data collection included study characteristics, number/type of BI-RADS 3 lesions, final diagnosis (histopathology and/or follow-up). Sources of bias (QUADAS-2) were assessed. Meta-analysis included data-pooling, heterogeneity testing, and meta-regression. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Prevalence was reported in 11 studies (range: 1.2-24.3%). Malignancy rates ranged between 0.5-10.1% (pooled 61/2814, 1.6%, 95%-CI:0.9-2.3% (random-effects-model), I(2)=53%, P=0.007). In a subgroup of 11 studies (2183 lesions), highest malignancy rates were observed in non-mass lesions (pooled 25/714, 2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%, I(2)=52%, P=0.021) followed by mass lesions (pooled 15/771, 1.5%, 95%-CI:0.7-2.4%, I(2)=0%, P=0.929), and foci (pooled 10/698, 1%, 95%-CI:0.3-1.7%, I(2)=0%, P=0.800). There was non-significant negative association between prevalence and malignancy rates (P=0.077). Malignant lesions were diagnosed at all follow-up time points. CONCLUSION: While prevalence of MRI BI-RADS 3 lesions was strongly heterogeneous, pooled malignancy rates met BI-RADS benchmarks (<2%). Malignancy rates varied, exceeding 2% in non-mass lesions. Twenty-four-month surveillance is required to detect all malignant lesions. KEY POINTS: • Probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions showed a pooled malignancy-rate of 1.6% (95%-CI:0.9-2.3%). • Malignancy rates differ and are highest in non-mass lesions (2.3%, 95%-CI:0.8-3.9%). • The prevalence of BI-RADS 3 lesions on breast MRI ranged from 1.2-24.3%. • Malignant lesions were diagnosed at follow-up time points up to 24 months. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-11-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5882619/ /pubmed/29168006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5127-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Breast
Spick, Claudio
Bickel, Hubert
Polanec, Stephan H.
Baltzer, Pascal A.
Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort breast lesions classified as probably benign (bi-rads 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5882619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5127-y
work_keys_str_mv AT spickclaudio breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bickelhubert breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT polanecstephanh breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baltzerpascala breastlesionsclassifiedasprobablybenignbirads3onmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis