Cargando…

Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients that show a pathological complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, have better prognosis. To increase pCR rates several studies escalate the tumor irradiation dose. However, due to lacking tumor contrast on online imaging techniques, no direct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleijnen, Jean-Paul J. E., van Asselen, Bram, Intven, Martijn, Burbach, Johannes P. M., Philippens, Marielle E. P., Lagendijk, Jan J. W., Raaymakers, Bas W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1011-4
_version_ 1783311620300079104
author Kleijnen, Jean-Paul J. E.
van Asselen, Bram
Intven, Martijn
Burbach, Johannes P. M.
Philippens, Marielle E. P.
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
Raaymakers, Bas W.
author_facet Kleijnen, Jean-Paul J. E.
van Asselen, Bram
Intven, Martijn
Burbach, Johannes P. M.
Philippens, Marielle E. P.
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
Raaymakers, Bas W.
author_sort Kleijnen, Jean-Paul J. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients that show a pathological complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, have better prognosis. To increase pCR rates several studies escalate the tumor irradiation dose. However, due to lacking tumor contrast on online imaging techniques, no direct tumor setup can be performed and large boost margins are needed to ensure tumor coverage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of performing a setup on rectal wall for rectal cancer boost radiotherapy, thereby using rectal wall nearby the tumor as tumor position surrogate. METHODS: For sixteen patients, daily MRI’s were performed during 1 week of radiotherapy. On each of these images, tumor and rectum were delineated. Residual displacements were determined per surface voxel after setup on bony anatomy or nearby rectal wall and setup errors for both setups were compared. Furthermore for every rectal wall voxel nearby the tumor, displacement was compared with the closest tumor point and correlation was determined. RESULTS: Mean (SD) setup error was 2.7 mm (3.3 mm) and 2.2 mm (3.2 mm) after setup on bony anatomy and rectal wall respectively. Nevertheless, similar PTV-margin estimates i.e. 95th percentile distances, were found; 8.0 mm. Also, a merely moderate correlation; ρ = 0.66 was found between rectal wall and tumor displacement. Further investigation into tumor and rectal mobility differences showed that the rectal wall lacks appropriate anatomical landmarks to find true displacements, especially to capture motion along the rectal wall. CONCLUSIONS: Setup on rectal wall slightly reduces mean setup errors but requires a similar PTV-margin as compared to setup on bony anatomy. Rectal mobility might be similar to tumor mobility, but due the absence of anatomical landmarks in the rectum, displacements along the rectal wall are not detected on current online imaging. Therefore, to further reduce tumor position uncertainties, direct or indirect online tumor visualization is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5883297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58832972018-04-10 Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy? Kleijnen, Jean-Paul J. E. van Asselen, Bram Intven, Martijn Burbach, Johannes P. M. Philippens, Marielle E. P. Lagendijk, Jan J. W. Raaymakers, Bas W. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients that show a pathological complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, have better prognosis. To increase pCR rates several studies escalate the tumor irradiation dose. However, due to lacking tumor contrast on online imaging techniques, no direct tumor setup can be performed and large boost margins are needed to ensure tumor coverage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of performing a setup on rectal wall for rectal cancer boost radiotherapy, thereby using rectal wall nearby the tumor as tumor position surrogate. METHODS: For sixteen patients, daily MRI’s were performed during 1 week of radiotherapy. On each of these images, tumor and rectum were delineated. Residual displacements were determined per surface voxel after setup on bony anatomy or nearby rectal wall and setup errors for both setups were compared. Furthermore for every rectal wall voxel nearby the tumor, displacement was compared with the closest tumor point and correlation was determined. RESULTS: Mean (SD) setup error was 2.7 mm (3.3 mm) and 2.2 mm (3.2 mm) after setup on bony anatomy and rectal wall respectively. Nevertheless, similar PTV-margin estimates i.e. 95th percentile distances, were found; 8.0 mm. Also, a merely moderate correlation; ρ = 0.66 was found between rectal wall and tumor displacement. Further investigation into tumor and rectal mobility differences showed that the rectal wall lacks appropriate anatomical landmarks to find true displacements, especially to capture motion along the rectal wall. CONCLUSIONS: Setup on rectal wall slightly reduces mean setup errors but requires a similar PTV-margin as compared to setup on bony anatomy. Rectal mobility might be similar to tumor mobility, but due the absence of anatomical landmarks in the rectum, displacements along the rectal wall are not detected on current online imaging. Therefore, to further reduce tumor position uncertainties, direct or indirect online tumor visualization is needed. BioMed Central 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5883297/ /pubmed/29615067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1011-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kleijnen, Jean-Paul J. E.
van Asselen, Bram
Intven, Martijn
Burbach, Johannes P. M.
Philippens, Marielle E. P.
Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
Raaymakers, Bas W.
Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
title Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
title_full Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
title_fullStr Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
title_short Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
title_sort does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1011-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kleijnenjeanpaulje doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy
AT vanasselenbram doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy
AT intvenmartijn doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy
AT burbachjohannespm doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy
AT philippensmarielleep doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy
AT lagendijkjanjw doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy
AT raaymakersbasw doessetuponrectalwallimproverectalcancerboostradiotherapy