Cargando…

Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice

BACKGROUND: Current medical treatments for endometriosis are very limited. Progestin and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) are developed but their efficacy, safety, mechanism and recurrence in endometriosis are not fully studied. METHODS: In order to compare therapeutic, side effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Bo, Wu, Ling, Xu, Hui, Cheung, Chun Wai, Fung, Wen Ying, Wong, Sze Wai, Wang, Chi Chiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0347-9
_version_ 1783311620528668672
author Liang, Bo
Wu, Ling
Xu, Hui
Cheung, Chun Wai
Fung, Wen Ying
Wong, Sze Wai
Wang, Chi Chiu
author_facet Liang, Bo
Wu, Ling
Xu, Hui
Cheung, Chun Wai
Fung, Wen Ying
Wong, Sze Wai
Wang, Chi Chiu
author_sort Liang, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current medical treatments for endometriosis are very limited. Progestin and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) are developed but their efficacy, safety, mechanism and recurrence in endometriosis are not fully studied. METHODS: In order to compare therapeutic, side effects and therapeutic actions of Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest in endometriosis. Experimental endometriosis was induced by either intraperitoneal or subcutaneous mouse endometrium transplantation. Lesion size, weight and histology at the end of intervention were compared. Expression of related markers in the endometriotic lesions were examined. Body, uterus and ovary weights, endometrial glands and thickness (ETI), and follicle count were measured. For recurrent study, lesion growth before and after intervention was monitored. RESULTS: After Esmya, Duphaston, Dienogest treatment, lesion size and weight were significantly decreased. Proliferation Pcna expression was significantly decreased in all groups, but proliferation cells were significantly decreased only in Duphaston group. Apoptosis Mapk1 expression and TUNEL-positive cells were significantly increased in Duphaston group. Adhesion Mmp2 and Itgavβ3 expression were significantly increased in Esmya group. Plau, Hif1α and Vegfa expression, peritoneal fluid PGE2 levels, and ERα and ERβ expression were not affected; while PR expression was significantly lower in all groups. Endometrial gland count in uterus was significantly increased in Dienogest group, ETI was significantly decreased in Duphaston group, and AFC were significantly increased in Esmya group. Upon treatment cessation, lesion growth rebound quickly in Dienogest and Duphaston groups, but slowly in Esmya group. CONCLUSION: Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest are effective anti-endometriosis drugs targeting proliferation, apoptosis and adhesion. Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest are all well tolerable, although endometrial glandular hyperplasia was found in Dienogest, endometrial atrophy in Duphaston, follicle accumulation in Esmya. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-018-0347-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5883298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58832982018-04-10 Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice Liang, Bo Wu, Ling Xu, Hui Cheung, Chun Wai Fung, Wen Ying Wong, Sze Wai Wang, Chi Chiu Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Current medical treatments for endometriosis are very limited. Progestin and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) are developed but their efficacy, safety, mechanism and recurrence in endometriosis are not fully studied. METHODS: In order to compare therapeutic, side effects and therapeutic actions of Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest in endometriosis. Experimental endometriosis was induced by either intraperitoneal or subcutaneous mouse endometrium transplantation. Lesion size, weight and histology at the end of intervention were compared. Expression of related markers in the endometriotic lesions were examined. Body, uterus and ovary weights, endometrial glands and thickness (ETI), and follicle count were measured. For recurrent study, lesion growth before and after intervention was monitored. RESULTS: After Esmya, Duphaston, Dienogest treatment, lesion size and weight were significantly decreased. Proliferation Pcna expression was significantly decreased in all groups, but proliferation cells were significantly decreased only in Duphaston group. Apoptosis Mapk1 expression and TUNEL-positive cells were significantly increased in Duphaston group. Adhesion Mmp2 and Itgavβ3 expression were significantly increased in Esmya group. Plau, Hif1α and Vegfa expression, peritoneal fluid PGE2 levels, and ERα and ERβ expression were not affected; while PR expression was significantly lower in all groups. Endometrial gland count in uterus was significantly increased in Dienogest group, ETI was significantly decreased in Duphaston group, and AFC were significantly increased in Esmya group. Upon treatment cessation, lesion growth rebound quickly in Dienogest and Duphaston groups, but slowly in Esmya group. CONCLUSION: Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest are effective anti-endometriosis drugs targeting proliferation, apoptosis and adhesion. Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest are all well tolerable, although endometrial glandular hyperplasia was found in Dienogest, endometrial atrophy in Duphaston, follicle accumulation in Esmya. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-018-0347-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5883298/ /pubmed/29615065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0347-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Liang, Bo
Wu, Ling
Xu, Hui
Cheung, Chun Wai
Fung, Wen Ying
Wong, Sze Wai
Wang, Chi Chiu
Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
title Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
title_full Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
title_fullStr Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
title_short Efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
title_sort efficacy, safety and recurrence of new progestins and selective progesterone receptor modulator for the treatment of endometriosis: a comparison study in mice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0347-9
work_keys_str_mv AT liangbo efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice
AT wuling efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice
AT xuhui efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice
AT cheungchunwai efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice
AT fungwenying efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice
AT wongszewai efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice
AT wangchichiu efficacysafetyandrecurrenceofnewprogestinsandselectiveprogesteronereceptormodulatorforthetreatmentofendometriosisacomparisonstudyinmice