Cargando…

Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion is a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis and acute in-stent thrombosis(1)Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laimoud, Mohamed, Nassar, Yasser, Omar, Walid, Abdelbarry, Akram, Elghawaby, Helmy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Egyptian Society of Cardiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.09.001
_version_ 1783311669522333696
author Laimoud, Mohamed
Nassar, Yasser
Omar, Walid
Abdelbarry, Akram
Elghawaby, Helmy
author_facet Laimoud, Mohamed
Nassar, Yasser
Omar, Walid
Abdelbarry, Akram
Elghawaby, Helmy
author_sort Laimoud, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion is a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis and acute in-stent thrombosis(1)Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved angiographic visualization of the stent (Koolen et al., 2005). AIM OF WORK: Comparison of stent expansion by IVUS and SB enhancement and detection of value of SB to guide dilatation post stent deployment. METHODOLOGY: IVUS, SB enhancement and QCA were done in 30 patients admitted for elective stenting procedures .We compared measurements of mean ±standard deviations of (Max SD, Min SD, Mean SD, stent symmetry index) using IVUS, SB and QCA after stent deployment and after postdilatation whenever necessary to optimize stent deployment. The Stent symmetry index was calculated [(maximum stent diameter minus minimum stent diameter) divided by maximum stent diameter]. RESULTS: The Max SD was (3.45 ± 0.62 vs 3.55 ± 0.56 vs 2.97 ± 0.59) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Max SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .009) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .53). The Min SD was (2.77 ± 0.53 vs 2.58 ± 0.56 vs 1.88 ± 0.60) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Min SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .07). The stent symmetry index was (0.24 ±0.09 vs 0.34 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ±0.27) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. It was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .32). SB was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.74) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.68). QCA was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD correlation (p < .0001 & r 0.69) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.63). QCA was positively correlated with SB measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.61) and Min SD (p .003 & r 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: StentBoost enhancement has superior correlations for stent expansion measured by IVUS when compared with QCA. SB enhancement improved stent visualization and identification of stent underexpansion to guide stent postdilatation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5883512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Egyptian Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58835122018-04-05 Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions Laimoud, Mohamed Nassar, Yasser Omar, Walid Abdelbarry, Akram Elghawaby, Helmy Egypt Heart J Cardiac Imaging BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion is a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis and acute in-stent thrombosis(1)Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved angiographic visualization of the stent (Koolen et al., 2005). AIM OF WORK: Comparison of stent expansion by IVUS and SB enhancement and detection of value of SB to guide dilatation post stent deployment. METHODOLOGY: IVUS, SB enhancement and QCA were done in 30 patients admitted for elective stenting procedures .We compared measurements of mean ±standard deviations of (Max SD, Min SD, Mean SD, stent symmetry index) using IVUS, SB and QCA after stent deployment and after postdilatation whenever necessary to optimize stent deployment. The Stent symmetry index was calculated [(maximum stent diameter minus minimum stent diameter) divided by maximum stent diameter]. RESULTS: The Max SD was (3.45 ± 0.62 vs 3.55 ± 0.56 vs 2.97 ± 0.59) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Max SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .009) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .53). The Min SD was (2.77 ± 0.53 vs 2.58 ± 0.56 vs 1.88 ± 0.60) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Min SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .07). The stent symmetry index was (0.24 ±0.09 vs 0.34 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ±0.27) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. It was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .32). SB was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.74) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.68). QCA was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD correlation (p < .0001 & r 0.69) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.63). QCA was positively correlated with SB measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.61) and Min SD (p .003 & r 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: StentBoost enhancement has superior correlations for stent expansion measured by IVUS when compared with QCA. SB enhancement improved stent visualization and identification of stent underexpansion to guide stent postdilatation. Egyptian Society of Cardiology 2018-03 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5883512/ /pubmed/29622993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.09.001 Text en © 2017 Egyptian Society of Cardiology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Cardiac Imaging
Laimoud, Mohamed
Nassar, Yasser
Omar, Walid
Abdelbarry, Akram
Elghawaby, Helmy
Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
title Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
title_full Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
title_fullStr Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
title_full_unstemmed Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
title_short Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
title_sort stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
topic Cardiac Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT laimoudmohamed stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions
AT nassaryasser stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions
AT omarwalid stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions
AT abdelbarryakram stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions
AT elghawabyhelmy stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions