Cargando…
Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions
BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion is a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis and acute in-stent thrombosis(1)Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Egyptian Society of Cardiology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.09.001 |
_version_ | 1783311669522333696 |
---|---|
author | Laimoud, Mohamed Nassar, Yasser Omar, Walid Abdelbarry, Akram Elghawaby, Helmy |
author_facet | Laimoud, Mohamed Nassar, Yasser Omar, Walid Abdelbarry, Akram Elghawaby, Helmy |
author_sort | Laimoud, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion is a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis and acute in-stent thrombosis(1)Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved angiographic visualization of the stent (Koolen et al., 2005). AIM OF WORK: Comparison of stent expansion by IVUS and SB enhancement and detection of value of SB to guide dilatation post stent deployment. METHODOLOGY: IVUS, SB enhancement and QCA were done in 30 patients admitted for elective stenting procedures .We compared measurements of mean ±standard deviations of (Max SD, Min SD, Mean SD, stent symmetry index) using IVUS, SB and QCA after stent deployment and after postdilatation whenever necessary to optimize stent deployment. The Stent symmetry index was calculated [(maximum stent diameter minus minimum stent diameter) divided by maximum stent diameter]. RESULTS: The Max SD was (3.45 ± 0.62 vs 3.55 ± 0.56 vs 2.97 ± 0.59) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Max SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .009) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .53). The Min SD was (2.77 ± 0.53 vs 2.58 ± 0.56 vs 1.88 ± 0.60) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Min SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .07). The stent symmetry index was (0.24 ±0.09 vs 0.34 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ±0.27) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. It was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .32). SB was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.74) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.68). QCA was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD correlation (p < .0001 & r 0.69) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.63). QCA was positively correlated with SB measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.61) and Min SD (p .003 & r 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: StentBoost enhancement has superior correlations for stent expansion measured by IVUS when compared with QCA. SB enhancement improved stent visualization and identification of stent underexpansion to guide stent postdilatation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5883512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Egyptian Society of Cardiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58835122018-04-05 Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions Laimoud, Mohamed Nassar, Yasser Omar, Walid Abdelbarry, Akram Elghawaby, Helmy Egypt Heart J Cardiac Imaging BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion is a major risk factor for in-stent restenosis and acute in-stent thrombosis(1)Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved angiographic visualization of the stent (Koolen et al., 2005). AIM OF WORK: Comparison of stent expansion by IVUS and SB enhancement and detection of value of SB to guide dilatation post stent deployment. METHODOLOGY: IVUS, SB enhancement and QCA were done in 30 patients admitted for elective stenting procedures .We compared measurements of mean ±standard deviations of (Max SD, Min SD, Mean SD, stent symmetry index) using IVUS, SB and QCA after stent deployment and after postdilatation whenever necessary to optimize stent deployment. The Stent symmetry index was calculated [(maximum stent diameter minus minimum stent diameter) divided by maximum stent diameter]. RESULTS: The Max SD was (3.45 ± 0.62 vs 3.55 ± 0.56 vs 2.97 ± 0.59) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Max SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .009) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .53). The Min SD was (2.77 ± 0.53 vs 2.58 ± 0.56 vs 1.88 ± 0.60) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Min SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .07). The stent symmetry index was (0.24 ±0.09 vs 0.34 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ±0.27) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. It was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .32). SB was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.74) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.68). QCA was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD correlation (p < .0001 & r 0.69) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.63). QCA was positively correlated with SB measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.61) and Min SD (p .003 & r 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: StentBoost enhancement has superior correlations for stent expansion measured by IVUS when compared with QCA. SB enhancement improved stent visualization and identification of stent underexpansion to guide stent postdilatation. Egyptian Society of Cardiology 2018-03 2017-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5883512/ /pubmed/29622993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.09.001 Text en © 2017 Egyptian Society of Cardiology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Cardiac Imaging Laimoud, Mohamed Nassar, Yasser Omar, Walid Abdelbarry, Akram Elghawaby, Helmy Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
title | Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_full | Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_fullStr | Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_short | Stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_sort | stent boost enhancement compared to intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of stent expansion in elective percutaneous coronary interventions |
topic | Cardiac Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29622993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.09.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laimoudmohamed stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions AT nassaryasser stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions AT omarwalid stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions AT abdelbarryakram stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions AT elghawabyhelmy stentboostenhancementcomparedtointravascularultrasoundintheevaluationofstentexpansioninelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventions |