Cargando…

Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives

In contrast to the majority of allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, worldwide anaphylaxis epidemiological data remain sparse with low accuracy, which hampers comparable morbidity statistics. Data can differ widely depending on a number of variables. In the current document we reviewed the forms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanno, Luciana Kase, Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza, Simons, F. Estelle R., Cardona, Victoria, Thong, Bernard Yu-Hor, Molinari, Nicolas, Calderon, Moises A., Worm, Margitta, Chang, Yoon-Seok, Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G., Casale, Thomas, Demoly, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0234-0
Descripción
Sumario:In contrast to the majority of allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, worldwide anaphylaxis epidemiological data remain sparse with low accuracy, which hampers comparable morbidity statistics. Data can differ widely depending on a number of variables. In the current document we reviewed the forms on which anaphylaxis has been defined and classified; and how it can affect epidemiological data. With regards to the methods used to capture morbidity statistics, we observed the impact of the anaphylaxis coding utilizing the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases. As an outcome and depending on the anaphylaxis definition, we extracted the cumulative incidence, which may not reflect the real number of new cases. The new ICD-11 anaphylaxis subsection developments and critical view of morbidity statistics data are discussed in order to reach new perspectives on anaphylaxis epidemiology.