Cargando…
Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives
In contrast to the majority of allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, worldwide anaphylaxis epidemiological data remain sparse with low accuracy, which hampers comparable morbidity statistics. Data can differ widely depending on a number of variables. In the current document we reviewed the forms...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0234-0 |
_version_ | 1783311672863096832 |
---|---|
author | Tanno, Luciana Kase Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Simons, F. Estelle R. Cardona, Victoria Thong, Bernard Yu-Hor Molinari, Nicolas Calderon, Moises A. Worm, Margitta Chang, Yoon-Seok Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G. Casale, Thomas Demoly, Pascal |
author_facet | Tanno, Luciana Kase Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Simons, F. Estelle R. Cardona, Victoria Thong, Bernard Yu-Hor Molinari, Nicolas Calderon, Moises A. Worm, Margitta Chang, Yoon-Seok Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G. Casale, Thomas Demoly, Pascal |
author_sort | Tanno, Luciana Kase |
collection | PubMed |
description | In contrast to the majority of allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, worldwide anaphylaxis epidemiological data remain sparse with low accuracy, which hampers comparable morbidity statistics. Data can differ widely depending on a number of variables. In the current document we reviewed the forms on which anaphylaxis has been defined and classified; and how it can affect epidemiological data. With regards to the methods used to capture morbidity statistics, we observed the impact of the anaphylaxis coding utilizing the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases. As an outcome and depending on the anaphylaxis definition, we extracted the cumulative incidence, which may not reflect the real number of new cases. The new ICD-11 anaphylaxis subsection developments and critical view of morbidity statistics data are discussed in order to reach new perspectives on anaphylaxis epidemiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5883526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58835262018-04-09 Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives Tanno, Luciana Kase Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Simons, F. Estelle R. Cardona, Victoria Thong, Bernard Yu-Hor Molinari, Nicolas Calderon, Moises A. Worm, Margitta Chang, Yoon-Seok Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G. Casale, Thomas Demoly, Pascal Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Review In contrast to the majority of allergic or hypersensitivity conditions, worldwide anaphylaxis epidemiological data remain sparse with low accuracy, which hampers comparable morbidity statistics. Data can differ widely depending on a number of variables. In the current document we reviewed the forms on which anaphylaxis has been defined and classified; and how it can affect epidemiological data. With regards to the methods used to capture morbidity statistics, we observed the impact of the anaphylaxis coding utilizing the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases. As an outcome and depending on the anaphylaxis definition, we extracted the cumulative incidence, which may not reflect the real number of new cases. The new ICD-11 anaphylaxis subsection developments and critical view of morbidity statistics data are discussed in order to reach new perspectives on anaphylaxis epidemiology. BioMed Central 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5883526/ /pubmed/29632547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0234-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Tanno, Luciana Kase Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Simons, F. Estelle R. Cardona, Victoria Thong, Bernard Yu-Hor Molinari, Nicolas Calderon, Moises A. Worm, Margitta Chang, Yoon-Seok Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G. Casale, Thomas Demoly, Pascal Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
title | Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
title_full | Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
title_fullStr | Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
title_short | Critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
title_sort | critical view of anaphylaxis epidemiology: open questions and new perspectives |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0234-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tannolucianakase criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT bierrenbachanaluiza criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT simonsfesteller criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT cardonavictoria criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT thongbernardyuhor criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT molinarinicolas criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT calderonmoisesa criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT wormmargitta criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT changyoonseok criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT papadopoulosnikolaosg criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT casalethomas criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT demolypascal criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives AT criticalviewofanaphylaxisepidemiologyopenquestionsandnewperspectives |