Cargando…

Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease. METHODS: From April 2010 to October 2010, 38 patients with single- or double-level cervical disc he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lin-nan, Hu, Bo-wen, Wang, Lei, Song, Yue-ming, Yang, Xi, Liu, Li-min, Liu, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2017-7
_version_ 1783311674061619200
author Wang, Lin-nan
Hu, Bo-wen
Wang, Lei
Song, Yue-ming
Yang, Xi
Liu, Li-min
Liu, Hao
author_facet Wang, Lin-nan
Hu, Bo-wen
Wang, Lei
Song, Yue-ming
Yang, Xi
Liu, Li-min
Liu, Hao
author_sort Wang, Lin-nan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease. METHODS: From April 2010 to October 2010, 38 patients with single- or double-level cervical disc herniation underwent anterior cervical discectomy and DCI arthroplasty. The clinical results and radiographic outcomes of these 38 patients (42 levels) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical results included the visual analogue scale, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index score, 36-item short form health survey questionnaire, and incidences of complications and neurological deterioration. Radiographic results including cervical alignment, intervertebral height, cervical range of motion (ROM), ROM of the functional spinal unit, adjacent intervertebral ROM, migration, subsidence, and heterotopic ossification (HO) were assessed on plain radiography, three-dimensional computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 72.3 months (range 68–78 months). During follow-up, all patients showed significant improvements in the visual analogue scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index score, 36-item short form health survey physical component summary score and mental component summary score. The ROM of the functional spinal unit was partly reduced. The DCI migrated forward in 10 of 42 (23.8%) cases, and HO was detected in 24 of the 42 (57.1%) DCI segments. Subsidence was observed in 14 of 42 (33.3%) DCI segments. Two patients experienced symptom recurrence, and were treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy of DCI arthroplasty was maintained during mid- to long-term follow-up. HO formation is a common phenomenon, leading to a substantial decrease in ROM at the index level and recurrence of neurological symptoms. The incidence of implant subsidence and migration is relatively high, leaving a potential risk of symptoms at the index level and adjacent segment degeneration. We consider that the first choice for patients with degenerative cervical disc disease should still be total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, rather than DCI arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5883531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58835312018-04-09 Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up Wang, Lin-nan Hu, Bo-wen Wang, Lei Song, Yue-ming Yang, Xi Liu, Li-min Liu, Hao BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease. METHODS: From April 2010 to October 2010, 38 patients with single- or double-level cervical disc herniation underwent anterior cervical discectomy and DCI arthroplasty. The clinical results and radiographic outcomes of these 38 patients (42 levels) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical results included the visual analogue scale, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index score, 36-item short form health survey questionnaire, and incidences of complications and neurological deterioration. Radiographic results including cervical alignment, intervertebral height, cervical range of motion (ROM), ROM of the functional spinal unit, adjacent intervertebral ROM, migration, subsidence, and heterotopic ossification (HO) were assessed on plain radiography, three-dimensional computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 72.3 months (range 68–78 months). During follow-up, all patients showed significant improvements in the visual analogue scale score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index score, 36-item short form health survey physical component summary score and mental component summary score. The ROM of the functional spinal unit was partly reduced. The DCI migrated forward in 10 of 42 (23.8%) cases, and HO was detected in 24 of the 42 (57.1%) DCI segments. Subsidence was observed in 14 of 42 (33.3%) DCI segments. Two patients experienced symptom recurrence, and were treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy of DCI arthroplasty was maintained during mid- to long-term follow-up. HO formation is a common phenomenon, leading to a substantial decrease in ROM at the index level and recurrence of neurological symptoms. The incidence of implant subsidence and migration is relatively high, leaving a potential risk of symptoms at the index level and adjacent segment degeneration. We consider that the first choice for patients with degenerative cervical disc disease should still be total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, rather than DCI arthroplasty. BioMed Central 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5883531/ /pubmed/29615017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2017-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Lin-nan
Hu, Bo-wen
Wang, Lei
Song, Yue-ming
Yang, Xi
Liu, Li-min
Liu, Hao
Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
title Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
title_full Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
title_short Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
title_sort clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (dci) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2017-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglinnan clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup
AT hubowen clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup
AT wanglei clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup
AT songyueming clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup
AT yangxi clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup
AT liulimin clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup
AT liuhao clinicalandradiographicoutcomeofdynamiccervicalimplantdciarthroplastyfordegenerativecervicaldiscdiseaseaminimalfiveyearfollowup