Cargando…

NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes

BACKGROUND: The National Health Checks programme aims to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and health inequalities in England. We assessed equity of uptake and outcomes from NHS Health Checks in general practices in Bristol, UK. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using patient-level data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coghill, N., Garside, L., Montgomery, A. A., Feder, G., Horwood, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8
_version_ 1783311684635459584
author Coghill, N.
Garside, L.
Montgomery, A. A.
Feder, G.
Horwood, J.
author_facet Coghill, N.
Garside, L.
Montgomery, A. A.
Feder, G.
Horwood, J.
author_sort Coghill, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National Health Checks programme aims to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and health inequalities in England. We assessed equity of uptake and outcomes from NHS Health Checks in general practices in Bristol, UK. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using patient-level data, from 38 general practices. We descriptively analysed the socioeconomic status (SES) of patients invited and the SES and ethnicity of those attending. Logistic regression was used to test associations between invitation and attendance, with population characteristics. RESULTS: Between June 2010 to October 2014, 31,881 patients were invited, and 13,733 NHS Health Checks completed. 47% of patients invited from the three least and 39% from the two most-deprived index of multiple deprivation quintiles, completed a Check. Proportions of invited patients, by ethnicity were 64% non-black and Asian and 31% black and Asian. Men were less likely to attend than women (OR 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.80), as were patients ≤ 49 compared to ≥ 70 years (OR 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.83). After controlling for SES and population characteristics, compared to patients with low CVD risk, high risk patients were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular drugs (OR 6.2, 95% confidence interval 4.51 to 8.40). Compared to men, women (OR 01.18, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.35) were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular drugs, as were those ≤ 49 years (50–59 years, OR 1.42, 95% confidence intervals 1.13–1.79, 60–69 years, OR 1.60, 95% confidence intervals, 1.22–2.10, ≥ 70 years, OR 1.64, 95% confidence intervals, 1.14 to 2.35). Controlling for population characteristics, the following groups were most likely to be referred to lifestyle services: younger women (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.94), those in the most deprived IMD quintile (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.36) and those at highest risk of CVD (OR, 2.77, 95% CI 1.91 to 4.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant evidence of inequity in attendance for an NHS Health Check by SES. Being older or a woman were associated with better attendance. Targeting men, younger patients and ethnic minority groups may improve equity in uptake for NHS Health Checks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5883605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58836052018-04-09 NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes Coghill, N. Garside, L. Montgomery, A. A. Feder, G. Horwood, J. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The National Health Checks programme aims to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and health inequalities in England. We assessed equity of uptake and outcomes from NHS Health Checks in general practices in Bristol, UK. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using patient-level data, from 38 general practices. We descriptively analysed the socioeconomic status (SES) of patients invited and the SES and ethnicity of those attending. Logistic regression was used to test associations between invitation and attendance, with population characteristics. RESULTS: Between June 2010 to October 2014, 31,881 patients were invited, and 13,733 NHS Health Checks completed. 47% of patients invited from the three least and 39% from the two most-deprived index of multiple deprivation quintiles, completed a Check. Proportions of invited patients, by ethnicity were 64% non-black and Asian and 31% black and Asian. Men were less likely to attend than women (OR 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.80), as were patients ≤ 49 compared to ≥ 70 years (OR 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.83). After controlling for SES and population characteristics, compared to patients with low CVD risk, high risk patients were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular drugs (OR 6.2, 95% confidence interval 4.51 to 8.40). Compared to men, women (OR 01.18, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.35) were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular drugs, as were those ≤ 49 years (50–59 years, OR 1.42, 95% confidence intervals 1.13–1.79, 60–69 years, OR 1.60, 95% confidence intervals, 1.22–2.10, ≥ 70 years, OR 1.64, 95% confidence intervals, 1.14 to 2.35). Controlling for population characteristics, the following groups were most likely to be referred to lifestyle services: younger women (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.94), those in the most deprived IMD quintile (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.36) and those at highest risk of CVD (OR, 2.77, 95% CI 1.91 to 4.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant evidence of inequity in attendance for an NHS Health Check by SES. Being older or a woman were associated with better attendance. Targeting men, younger patients and ethnic minority groups may improve equity in uptake for NHS Health Checks. BioMed Central 2018-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5883605/ /pubmed/29615026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coghill, N.
Garside, L.
Montgomery, A. A.
Feder, G.
Horwood, J.
NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
title NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
title_full NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
title_fullStr NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
title_short NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
title_sort nhs health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5883605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8
work_keys_str_mv AT coghilln nhshealthchecksacrosssectionalobservationalstudyonequityofuptakeandoutcomes
AT garsidel nhshealthchecksacrosssectionalobservationalstudyonequityofuptakeandoutcomes
AT montgomeryaa nhshealthchecksacrosssectionalobservationalstudyonequityofuptakeandoutcomes
AT federg nhshealthchecksacrosssectionalobservationalstudyonequityofuptakeandoutcomes
AT horwoodj nhshealthchecksacrosssectionalobservationalstudyonequityofuptakeandoutcomes