Cargando…

Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()

OBJECTIVE: Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) infection has been suggested to promote epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development. This study sought to explore the presence of C. trachomatis DNA and chlamydial heat shock protein 60 (chsp60) in ovarian tissue, as well as anti-chlamydial IgG antib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonsson, Sarah, Oda, Husam, Lundin, Eva, Olsson, Jan, Idahl, Annika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.008
_version_ 1783311776629129216
author Jonsson, Sarah
Oda, Husam
Lundin, Eva
Olsson, Jan
Idahl, Annika
author_facet Jonsson, Sarah
Oda, Husam
Lundin, Eva
Olsson, Jan
Idahl, Annika
author_sort Jonsson, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) infection has been suggested to promote epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development. This study sought to explore the presence of C. trachomatis DNA and chlamydial heat shock protein 60 (chsp60) in ovarian tissue, as well as anti-chlamydial IgG antibodies in plasma, in relation to subtypes of EOC. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort consisted of 69 women who underwent surgery due to suspected ovarian pathology. Ovarian tissue and corresponding blood samples were collected at the time of diagnosis. In ovarian tumor tissue, p53, p16, Ki67 and chsp60 were analyzed immunohistochemically, and PCR was used to detect C. trachomatis DNA. Plasma C. trachomatis IgG and cHSP60 IgG were analyzed with a commercial MIF-test and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: Eight out of 69 women had C. trachomatis DNA in their ovarian tissue, all were invasive ovarian cancer cases (16.7% of invasive EOC). The prevalence of the chsp60 protein, C. trachomatis IgG and cHSP60 IgG in HGSC, compared to other ovarian tumors, was 56.0% vs. 37.2% P = .13, 15.4% vs. 9.3% P = .46 and 63.6% vs. 45.5% P = .33 respectively. None of the markers of C. trachomatis infection were associated with p53, p16 or Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: C. trachomatis was detected in invasive ovarian cancer, supporting a possible role in carcinogenesis of EOC. However, there were no statistically significant associations of chsp60 in ovarian tissue, or plasma anti-chlamydial IgG antibodies, with any of the subtypes of ovarian tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5884191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58841912018-04-06 Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()() Jonsson, Sarah Oda, Husam Lundin, Eva Olsson, Jan Idahl, Annika Transl Oncol Original article OBJECTIVE: Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) infection has been suggested to promote epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development. This study sought to explore the presence of C. trachomatis DNA and chlamydial heat shock protein 60 (chsp60) in ovarian tissue, as well as anti-chlamydial IgG antibodies in plasma, in relation to subtypes of EOC. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort consisted of 69 women who underwent surgery due to suspected ovarian pathology. Ovarian tissue and corresponding blood samples were collected at the time of diagnosis. In ovarian tumor tissue, p53, p16, Ki67 and chsp60 were analyzed immunohistochemically, and PCR was used to detect C. trachomatis DNA. Plasma C. trachomatis IgG and cHSP60 IgG were analyzed with a commercial MIF-test and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: Eight out of 69 women had C. trachomatis DNA in their ovarian tissue, all were invasive ovarian cancer cases (16.7% of invasive EOC). The prevalence of the chsp60 protein, C. trachomatis IgG and cHSP60 IgG in HGSC, compared to other ovarian tumors, was 56.0% vs. 37.2% P = .13, 15.4% vs. 9.3% P = .46 and 63.6% vs. 45.5% P = .33 respectively. None of the markers of C. trachomatis infection were associated with p53, p16 or Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: C. trachomatis was detected in invasive ovarian cancer, supporting a possible role in carcinogenesis of EOC. However, there were no statistically significant associations of chsp60 in ovarian tissue, or plasma anti-chlamydial IgG antibodies, with any of the subtypes of ovarian tumors. Neoplasia Press 2018-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5884191/ /pubmed/29524832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.008 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Neoplasia Press, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Jonsson, Sarah
Oda, Husam
Lundin, Eva
Olsson, Jan
Idahl, Annika
Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()
title Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()
title_full Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()
title_fullStr Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()
title_full_unstemmed Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()
title_short Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydial Heat Shock Protein 60 and Anti-Chlamydial Antibodies in Women with Epithelial Ovarian Tumors()()
title_sort chlamydia trachomatis, chlamydial heat shock protein 60 and anti-chlamydial antibodies in women with epithelial ovarian tumors()()
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.008
work_keys_str_mv AT jonssonsarah chlamydiatrachomatischlamydialheatshockprotein60andantichlamydialantibodiesinwomenwithepithelialovariantumors
AT odahusam chlamydiatrachomatischlamydialheatshockprotein60andantichlamydialantibodiesinwomenwithepithelialovariantumors
AT lundineva chlamydiatrachomatischlamydialheatshockprotein60andantichlamydialantibodiesinwomenwithepithelialovariantumors
AT olssonjan chlamydiatrachomatischlamydialheatshockprotein60andantichlamydialantibodiesinwomenwithepithelialovariantumors
AT idahlannika chlamydiatrachomatischlamydialheatshockprotein60andantichlamydialantibodiesinwomenwithepithelialovariantumors