Cargando…

A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study

PURPOSE: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual fie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitaoka, Yasushi, Tanito, Masaki, Yokoyama, Yu, Nitta, Koji, Katai, Maki, Omodaka, Kazuko, Nakazawa, Toru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8941489
_version_ 1783311778040512512
author Kitaoka, Yasushi
Tanito, Masaki
Yokoyama, Yu
Nitta, Koji
Katai, Maki
Omodaka, Kazuko
Nakazawa, Toru
author_facet Kitaoka, Yasushi
Tanito, Masaki
Yokoyama, Yu
Nitta, Koji
Katai, Maki
Omodaka, Kazuko
Nakazawa, Toru
author_sort Kitaoka, Yasushi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. METHODS: The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm(2) disc area). CONCLUSION: A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5884197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58841972018-05-10 A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study Kitaoka, Yasushi Tanito, Masaki Yokoyama, Yu Nitta, Koji Katai, Maki Omodaka, Kazuko Nakazawa, Toru J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. METHODS: The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm(2) disc area). CONCLUSION: A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression. Hindawi 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5884197/ /pubmed/29750124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8941489 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yasushi Kitaoka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kitaoka, Yasushi
Tanito, Masaki
Yokoyama, Yu
Nitta, Koji
Katai, Maki
Omodaka, Kazuko
Nakazawa, Toru
A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
title A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
title_full A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
title_fullStr A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
title_full_unstemmed A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
title_short A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
title_sort small disc area is a risk factor for visual field loss progression in primary open-angle glaucoma: the glaucoma stereo analysis study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8941489
work_keys_str_mv AT kitaokayasushi asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT tanitomasaki asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT yokoyamayu asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT nittakoji asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT kataimaki asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT omodakakazuko asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT nakazawatoru asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT kitaokayasushi smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT tanitomasaki smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT yokoyamayu smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT nittakoji smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT kataimaki smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT omodakakazuko smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy
AT nakazawatoru smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy