Cargando…
A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study
PURPOSE: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual fie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8941489 |
_version_ | 1783311778040512512 |
---|---|
author | Kitaoka, Yasushi Tanito, Masaki Yokoyama, Yu Nitta, Koji Katai, Maki Omodaka, Kazuko Nakazawa, Toru |
author_facet | Kitaoka, Yasushi Tanito, Masaki Yokoyama, Yu Nitta, Koji Katai, Maki Omodaka, Kazuko Nakazawa, Toru |
author_sort | Kitaoka, Yasushi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. METHODS: The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm(2) disc area). CONCLUSION: A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5884197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58841972018-05-10 A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study Kitaoka, Yasushi Tanito, Masaki Yokoyama, Yu Nitta, Koji Katai, Maki Omodaka, Kazuko Nakazawa, Toru J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study, a cross-sectional multicenter collaborative study, used a stereo fundus camera (nonmyd WX) to assess various morphological parameters of the optic nerve head (ONH) in glaucoma patients. We compared the associations of each parameter between the visual field loss progression group and no-progression group. METHODS: The study included 187 eyes of 187 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. We divided the mean deviation (MD) slope values of all patients into the progression group (<−0.3 dB/year) and no-progression group (≧−0.3 dB/year). ONH morphological parameters were calculated with prototype analysis software. The correlations between glaucomatous visual field progression and patient characteristics or each ONH parameter were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The MD slope averages in the progression group and no-progression group were −0.58 ± 0.28 dB/year and 0.05 ± 0.26 dB/year, respectively. Among disc parameters, vertical disc width (diameter), disc area, cup area, and cup volume in the progression group were significantly less than those in the no-progression group. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the visual field progression and disc area (odds ratio 0.49/mm(2) disc area). CONCLUSION: A smaller disc area may be associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression. Hindawi 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5884197/ /pubmed/29750124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8941489 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yasushi Kitaoka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kitaoka, Yasushi Tanito, Masaki Yokoyama, Yu Nitta, Koji Katai, Maki Omodaka, Kazuko Nakazawa, Toru A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study |
title | A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study |
title_full | A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study |
title_fullStr | A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study |
title_short | A Small Disc Area Is a Risk Factor for Visual Field Loss Progression in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study |
title_sort | small disc area is a risk factor for visual field loss progression in primary open-angle glaucoma: the glaucoma stereo analysis study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8941489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitaokayasushi asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT tanitomasaki asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT yokoyamayu asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT nittakoji asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT kataimaki asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT omodakakazuko asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT nakazawatoru asmalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT kitaokayasushi smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT tanitomasaki smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT yokoyamayu smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT nittakoji smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT kataimaki smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT omodakakazuko smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy AT nakazawatoru smalldiscareaisariskfactorforvisualfieldlossprogressioninprimaryopenangleglaucomatheglaucomastereoanalysisstudy |