Cargando…

Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients

The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI data bears much promise as a tool for visualizing tumours and monitoring treatment response. To improve the currently poor precision of IVIM, several fit algorithms have been suggested. In this work, we compared t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurney-Champion, Oliver J., Klaassen, Remy, Froeling, Martijn, Barbieri, Sebastiano, Stoker, Jaap, Engelbrecht, Marc R. W., Wilmink, Johanna W., Besselink, Marc G., Bel, Arjan, van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M., Nederveen, Aart J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29617445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194590
_version_ 1783311835787689984
author Gurney-Champion, Oliver J.
Klaassen, Remy
Froeling, Martijn
Barbieri, Sebastiano
Stoker, Jaap
Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
Wilmink, Johanna W.
Besselink, Marc G.
Bel, Arjan
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Nederveen, Aart J.
author_facet Gurney-Champion, Oliver J.
Klaassen, Remy
Froeling, Martijn
Barbieri, Sebastiano
Stoker, Jaap
Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
Wilmink, Johanna W.
Besselink, Marc G.
Bel, Arjan
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Nederveen, Aart J.
author_sort Gurney-Champion, Oliver J.
collection PubMed
description The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI data bears much promise as a tool for visualizing tumours and monitoring treatment response. To improve the currently poor precision of IVIM, several fit algorithms have been suggested. In this work, we compared the performance of two Bayesian IVIM fit algorithms and four other IVIM fit algorithms for pancreatic cancer imaging. DWI data were acquired in 14 pancreatic cancer patients during two MRI examinations. Three different measures of performance of the fitting algorithms were assessed: (i) uniqueness of fit parameters (Spearman’s rho); (ii) precision (within-subject coefficient of variation, wCV); and (iii) contrast between tumour and normal-appearing pancreatic tissue. For the diffusivity D and perfusion fraction f, a Bayesian fit (IVIM-Bayesian-lin) offered the best trade-off between tumour contrast and precision. With the exception for IVIM-Bayesian-lin, all algorithms resulted in a very poor precision of the pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* with a wCV of more than 50%. The pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* of the Bayesian approaches were, however, significantly correlated with D and f. Therefore, the added value of fitting D* was considered limited in pancreatic cancer patients. The easier implemented least squares fit with fixed D* (IVIM-fixed) performed similar to IVIM-Bayesian-lin for f and D. In conclusion, the best performing IVIM fit algorithm was IVM-Bayesian-lin, but an easier to implement least squares fit with fixed D* performs similarly in pancreatic cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5884505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58845052018-04-13 Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients Gurney-Champion, Oliver J. Klaassen, Remy Froeling, Martijn Barbieri, Sebastiano Stoker, Jaap Engelbrecht, Marc R. W. Wilmink, Johanna W. Besselink, Marc G. Bel, Arjan van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Nederveen, Aart J. PLoS One Research Article The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI data bears much promise as a tool for visualizing tumours and monitoring treatment response. To improve the currently poor precision of IVIM, several fit algorithms have been suggested. In this work, we compared the performance of two Bayesian IVIM fit algorithms and four other IVIM fit algorithms for pancreatic cancer imaging. DWI data were acquired in 14 pancreatic cancer patients during two MRI examinations. Three different measures of performance of the fitting algorithms were assessed: (i) uniqueness of fit parameters (Spearman’s rho); (ii) precision (within-subject coefficient of variation, wCV); and (iii) contrast between tumour and normal-appearing pancreatic tissue. For the diffusivity D and perfusion fraction f, a Bayesian fit (IVIM-Bayesian-lin) offered the best trade-off between tumour contrast and precision. With the exception for IVIM-Bayesian-lin, all algorithms resulted in a very poor precision of the pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* with a wCV of more than 50%. The pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* of the Bayesian approaches were, however, significantly correlated with D and f. Therefore, the added value of fitting D* was considered limited in pancreatic cancer patients. The easier implemented least squares fit with fixed D* (IVIM-fixed) performed similar to IVIM-Bayesian-lin for f and D. In conclusion, the best performing IVIM fit algorithm was IVM-Bayesian-lin, but an easier to implement least squares fit with fixed D* performs similarly in pancreatic cancer patients. Public Library of Science 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5884505/ /pubmed/29617445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194590 Text en © 2018 Gurney-Champion et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gurney-Champion, Oliver J.
Klaassen, Remy
Froeling, Martijn
Barbieri, Sebastiano
Stoker, Jaap
Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
Wilmink, Johanna W.
Besselink, Marc G.
Bel, Arjan
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Nederveen, Aart J.
Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
title Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
title_full Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
title_fullStr Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
title_short Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
title_sort comparison of six fit algorithms for the intra-voxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29617445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194590
work_keys_str_mv AT gurneychampionoliverj comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT klaassenremy comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT froelingmartijn comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT barbierisebastiano comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT stokerjaap comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT engelbrechtmarcrw comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT wilminkjohannaw comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT besselinkmarcg comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT belarjan comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients
AT nederveenaartj comparisonofsixfitalgorithmsfortheintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingdataofpancreaticcancerpatients