Cargando…

Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea is one of the major challenges for physicians in emergency department (ED). A correct diagnosis is frequently delayed and difficult to ascertain, and clinical uncertainty is common, explaining the need for rapid diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guttikonda, Siva Nageswara Rao, Vadapalli, Kiran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0181-z
_version_ 1783311868187639808
author Guttikonda, Siva Nageswara Rao
Vadapalli, Kiran
author_facet Guttikonda, Siva Nageswara Rao
Vadapalli, Kiran
author_sort Guttikonda, Siva Nageswara Rao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea is one of the major challenges for physicians in emergency department (ED). A correct diagnosis is frequently delayed and difficult to ascertain, and clinical uncertainty is common, explaining the need for rapid diagnosis and a management plan. The primary aim of our study is to assess a diagnostic strategy using multiorgan point of care ultrasonography (USG) to differentiate patients presenting with acute dyspnea to ED into different diagnostic categories for timely management in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study which assessed the diagnostic performance of a strategy in evaluating patients presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea as primary predominant complaint to ED. Focused multiorgan USG which includes cardiac USG for left ventricle systolic function, right ventricle enlargement, and pericardial effusion, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility, lung USG to identify various patterns (acute interstitial syndrome, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, consolidation, etc.) and renal USG to assess kidney size and echotexture was performed. Later, patients were grouped into one of ten clinical syndromes defined in the study based on USG and clinical patterns. Emergency diagnosis was compared with final hospital diagnosis to assess the accuracy of this strategy. RESULTS: Concordance between ED diagnosis of dyspnea using the diagnostic strategy proposed in the study with final hospital diagnosis was high with agreement in 88% of patients (Kappa statistic = .805, p = .000) which is statistically significant. The most common diagnosis was acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic strategy used in this study to identify ADHF was 97.3 and 93.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, jugular venous distension, fever and cough, ejection fraction (by eyeball method), dilated IVC, absent to decreased lung sliding showed independent association in predicting cardiac and non-cardiac diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study concludes that integrating focused multiorgan USG by lung-cardiac-IVC and renal ultrasound into routine clinical evaluation of patients with dyspnea has a higher accuracy for differentiating causes of dyspnea in emergency department. This strategy can be adopted even in resource limited setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5884754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58847542018-04-11 Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making Guttikonda, Siva Nageswara Rao Vadapalli, Kiran Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and management of patients presenting with acute dyspnea is one of the major challenges for physicians in emergency department (ED). A correct diagnosis is frequently delayed and difficult to ascertain, and clinical uncertainty is common, explaining the need for rapid diagnosis and a management plan. The primary aim of our study is to assess a diagnostic strategy using multiorgan point of care ultrasonography (USG) to differentiate patients presenting with acute dyspnea to ED into different diagnostic categories for timely management in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study which assessed the diagnostic performance of a strategy in evaluating patients presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea as primary predominant complaint to ED. Focused multiorgan USG which includes cardiac USG for left ventricle systolic function, right ventricle enlargement, and pericardial effusion, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility, lung USG to identify various patterns (acute interstitial syndrome, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, consolidation, etc.) and renal USG to assess kidney size and echotexture was performed. Later, patients were grouped into one of ten clinical syndromes defined in the study based on USG and clinical patterns. Emergency diagnosis was compared with final hospital diagnosis to assess the accuracy of this strategy. RESULTS: Concordance between ED diagnosis of dyspnea using the diagnostic strategy proposed in the study with final hospital diagnosis was high with agreement in 88% of patients (Kappa statistic = .805, p = .000) which is statistically significant. The most common diagnosis was acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic strategy used in this study to identify ADHF was 97.3 and 93.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, jugular venous distension, fever and cough, ejection fraction (by eyeball method), dilated IVC, absent to decreased lung sliding showed independent association in predicting cardiac and non-cardiac diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study concludes that integrating focused multiorgan USG by lung-cardiac-IVC and renal ultrasound into routine clinical evaluation of patients with dyspnea has a higher accuracy for differentiating causes of dyspnea in emergency department. This strategy can be adopted even in resource limited setting. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5884754/ /pubmed/29619581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0181-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Guttikonda, Siva Nageswara Rao
Vadapalli, Kiran
Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
title Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
title_full Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
title_fullStr Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
title_short Approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
title_sort approach to undifferentiated dyspnea in emergency department: aids in rapid clinical decision-making
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5884754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0181-z
work_keys_str_mv AT guttikondasivanageswararao approachtoundifferentiateddyspneainemergencydepartmentaidsinrapidclinicaldecisionmaking
AT vadapallikiran approachtoundifferentiateddyspneainemergencydepartmentaidsinrapidclinicaldecisionmaking