Cargando…

Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis

BACKGROUND: Within the new digital health landscape, the rise of health apps creates novel prospects for health promotion. The market is saturated with apps that aim to increase physical activity (PA). Despite the wide distribution and popularity of PA apps, there are limited data on their effective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bondaronek, Paulina, Alkhaldi, Ghadah, Slee, April, Hamilton, Fiona L, Murray, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9069
_version_ 1783311926230515712
author Bondaronek, Paulina
Alkhaldi, Ghadah
Slee, April
Hamilton, Fiona L
Murray, Elizabeth
author_facet Bondaronek, Paulina
Alkhaldi, Ghadah
Slee, April
Hamilton, Fiona L
Murray, Elizabeth
author_sort Bondaronek, Paulina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the new digital health landscape, the rise of health apps creates novel prospects for health promotion. The market is saturated with apps that aim to increase physical activity (PA). Despite the wide distribution and popularity of PA apps, there are limited data on their effectiveness, user experience, and safety of personal data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review and content analysis was to evaluate the quality of the most popular PA apps on the market using health care quality indicators. METHODS: The top-ranked 400 free and paid apps from iTunes and Google Play stores were screened. Apps were included if the primary behavior targeted was PA, targeted users were adults, and the apps had stand-alone functionality. The apps were downloaded on mobile phones and assessed by 2 reviewers against the following quality assessment criteria: (1) users’ data privacy and security, (2) presence of behavior change techniques (BCTs) and quality of the development and evaluation processes, and (3) user ratings and usability. RESULTS: Out of 400 apps, 156 met the inclusion criteria, of which 65 apps were randomly selected to be downloaded and assessed. Almost 30% apps (19/65) did not have privacy policy. Every app contained at least one BCT, with an average number of 7 and a maximum of 13 BCTs. All but one app had commercial affiliation, 12 consulted an expert, and none reported involving users in the app development. Only 12 of 65 apps had a peer-reviewed study connected to the app. User ratings were high, with only a quarter of the ratings falling below 4 stars. The median usability score was excellent—86.3 out of 100. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the popularity of PA apps available on the commercial market, there were substantial shortcomings in the areas of data safety and likelihood of effectiveness of the apps assessed. The limited quality of the apps may represent a missed opportunity for PA promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5885062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58850622018-04-11 Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis Bondaronek, Paulina Alkhaldi, Ghadah Slee, April Hamilton, Fiona L Murray, Elizabeth JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Review BACKGROUND: Within the new digital health landscape, the rise of health apps creates novel prospects for health promotion. The market is saturated with apps that aim to increase physical activity (PA). Despite the wide distribution and popularity of PA apps, there are limited data on their effectiveness, user experience, and safety of personal data. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review and content analysis was to evaluate the quality of the most popular PA apps on the market using health care quality indicators. METHODS: The top-ranked 400 free and paid apps from iTunes and Google Play stores were screened. Apps were included if the primary behavior targeted was PA, targeted users were adults, and the apps had stand-alone functionality. The apps were downloaded on mobile phones and assessed by 2 reviewers against the following quality assessment criteria: (1) users’ data privacy and security, (2) presence of behavior change techniques (BCTs) and quality of the development and evaluation processes, and (3) user ratings and usability. RESULTS: Out of 400 apps, 156 met the inclusion criteria, of which 65 apps were randomly selected to be downloaded and assessed. Almost 30% apps (19/65) did not have privacy policy. Every app contained at least one BCT, with an average number of 7 and a maximum of 13 BCTs. All but one app had commercial affiliation, 12 consulted an expert, and none reported involving users in the app development. Only 12 of 65 apps had a peer-reviewed study connected to the app. User ratings were high, with only a quarter of the ratings falling below 4 stars. The median usability score was excellent—86.3 out of 100. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the popularity of PA apps available on the commercial market, there were substantial shortcomings in the areas of data safety and likelihood of effectiveness of the apps assessed. The limited quality of the apps may represent a missed opportunity for PA promotion. JMIR Publications 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5885062/ /pubmed/29563080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9069 Text en ©Paulina Bondaronek, Ghadah Alkhaldi, April Slee, Fiona L Hamilton, Elizabeth Murray. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.03.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Bondaronek, Paulina
Alkhaldi, Ghadah
Slee, April
Hamilton, Fiona L
Murray, Elizabeth
Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
title Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
title_full Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
title_fullStr Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
title_short Quality of Publicly Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis
title_sort quality of publicly available physical activity apps: review and content analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29563080
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9069
work_keys_str_mv AT bondaronekpaulina qualityofpubliclyavailablephysicalactivityappsreviewandcontentanalysis
AT alkhaldighadah qualityofpubliclyavailablephysicalactivityappsreviewandcontentanalysis
AT sleeapril qualityofpubliclyavailablephysicalactivityappsreviewandcontentanalysis
AT hamiltonfional qualityofpubliclyavailablephysicalactivityappsreviewandcontentanalysis
AT murrayelizabeth qualityofpubliclyavailablephysicalactivityappsreviewandcontentanalysis