Cargando…

Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Blood pressure (BP) lowering is considered neuroprotective in patients with cerebral small vessel disease; however, more intensive regimens may increase cerebral hypoperfusion. This study examined the effect of standard vs intensive BP treatment on cerebral perfusion in patients with sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croall, Iain D., Tozer, Daniel J., Moynihan, Barry, Khan, Usman, O’Brien, John T., Morris, Robin G., Cambridge, Victoria C., Barrick, Thomas R., Blamire, Andrew M., Ford, Gary A., Markus, Hugh S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.5153
_version_ 1783311945481322496
author Croall, Iain D.
Tozer, Daniel J.
Moynihan, Barry
Khan, Usman
O’Brien, John T.
Morris, Robin G.
Cambridge, Victoria C.
Barrick, Thomas R.
Blamire, Andrew M.
Ford, Gary A.
Markus, Hugh S.
author_facet Croall, Iain D.
Tozer, Daniel J.
Moynihan, Barry
Khan, Usman
O’Brien, John T.
Morris, Robin G.
Cambridge, Victoria C.
Barrick, Thomas R.
Blamire, Andrew M.
Ford, Gary A.
Markus, Hugh S.
author_sort Croall, Iain D.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Blood pressure (BP) lowering is considered neuroprotective in patients with cerebral small vessel disease; however, more intensive regimens may increase cerebral hypoperfusion. This study examined the effect of standard vs intensive BP treatment on cerebral perfusion in patients with severe small vessel disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether standard vs intensive BP lowering over 3 months causes decreased cerebral perfusion in small vessel disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial took place at 2 English university medical centers. Patients were randomized via a central online system (in a 1:1 ratio). Seventy patients with hypertension and with magnetic resonance imaging–confirmed symptomatic lacunar infarct and confluent white matter hyperintensities were recruited between February 29, 2012, and October 21, 2015, and randomized (36 in the standard group and 34 in the intensive group). Analyzable data were available in 62 patients, 33 in the standard group and 29 in the intensive group, for intent-to-treat analysis. This experiment examines the 3-month follow-up period. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to standard (systolic, 130-140 mm Hg) or intensive (systolic, <125 mm Hg) BP targets, to be achieved through medication changes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cerebral perfusion was measured using arterial spin labeling; the primary end point was change in global perfusion between baseline and 3 months, compared between treatment groups by analysis of variance. Linear regression compared change in perfusion against change in BP. Magnetic resonance imaging scan analysis was masked to treatment group. RESULTS: Among 62 analyzable patients, the mean age was 69.3 years, and 60% (n = 37) were male. The mean (SD) systolic BP decreased by 8 (12) mm Hg in the standard group and by 27 (17) mm Hg in the intensive group (P < .001), with mean (SD) achieved pressures of 141 (13) and 126 (10) mm Hg, respectively. Change in global perfusion did not differ between treatment groups: the mean (SD) change was −0.5 (9.4) mL/min/100 g in the standard group vs 0.7 (8.6) mL/min/100 g in the intensive group (partial η(2), 0.004; 95% CI, −3.551 to 5.818; P = .63). No differences were observed when the analysis examined gray or white matter only or was confined to those achieving target BP. The number of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, with a mean (SD) of 0.21 (0.65) for the standard group and 0.32 (0.75) for the intensive group (P = .44). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intensive BP lowering did not reduce cerebral perfusion in severe small vessel disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN37694103
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5885221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58852212018-07-11 Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial Croall, Iain D. Tozer, Daniel J. Moynihan, Barry Khan, Usman O’Brien, John T. Morris, Robin G. Cambridge, Victoria C. Barrick, Thomas R. Blamire, Andrew M. Ford, Gary A. Markus, Hugh S. JAMA Neurol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Blood pressure (BP) lowering is considered neuroprotective in patients with cerebral small vessel disease; however, more intensive regimens may increase cerebral hypoperfusion. This study examined the effect of standard vs intensive BP treatment on cerebral perfusion in patients with severe small vessel disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether standard vs intensive BP lowering over 3 months causes decreased cerebral perfusion in small vessel disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial took place at 2 English university medical centers. Patients were randomized via a central online system (in a 1:1 ratio). Seventy patients with hypertension and with magnetic resonance imaging–confirmed symptomatic lacunar infarct and confluent white matter hyperintensities were recruited between February 29, 2012, and October 21, 2015, and randomized (36 in the standard group and 34 in the intensive group). Analyzable data were available in 62 patients, 33 in the standard group and 29 in the intensive group, for intent-to-treat analysis. This experiment examines the 3-month follow-up period. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to standard (systolic, 130-140 mm Hg) or intensive (systolic, <125 mm Hg) BP targets, to be achieved through medication changes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cerebral perfusion was measured using arterial spin labeling; the primary end point was change in global perfusion between baseline and 3 months, compared between treatment groups by analysis of variance. Linear regression compared change in perfusion against change in BP. Magnetic resonance imaging scan analysis was masked to treatment group. RESULTS: Among 62 analyzable patients, the mean age was 69.3 years, and 60% (n = 37) were male. The mean (SD) systolic BP decreased by 8 (12) mm Hg in the standard group and by 27 (17) mm Hg in the intensive group (P < .001), with mean (SD) achieved pressures of 141 (13) and 126 (10) mm Hg, respectively. Change in global perfusion did not differ between treatment groups: the mean (SD) change was −0.5 (9.4) mL/min/100 g in the standard group vs 0.7 (8.6) mL/min/100 g in the intensive group (partial η(2), 0.004; 95% CI, −3.551 to 5.818; P = .63). No differences were observed when the analysis examined gray or white matter only or was confined to those achieving target BP. The number of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, with a mean (SD) of 0.21 (0.65) for the standard group and 0.32 (0.75) for the intensive group (P = .44). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intensive BP lowering did not reduce cerebral perfusion in severe small vessel disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN37694103 American Medical Association 2018-03-05 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5885221/ /pubmed/29507944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.5153 Text en Copyright 2018 Croall ID et al. JAMA Neurology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Croall, Iain D.
Tozer, Daniel J.
Moynihan, Barry
Khan, Usman
O’Brien, John T.
Morris, Robin G.
Cambridge, Victoria C.
Barrick, Thomas R.
Blamire, Andrew M.
Ford, Gary A.
Markus, Hugh S.
Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effect of standard vs intensive blood pressure control on cerebral blood flow in small vessel disease: the preserve randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.5153
work_keys_str_mv AT croalliaind effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tozerdanielj effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT moynihanbarry effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khanusman effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT obrienjohnt effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT morrisrobing effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cambridgevictoriac effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT barrickthomasr effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT blamireandrewm effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fordgarya effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial
AT markushughs effectofstandardvsintensivebloodpressurecontroloncerebralbloodflowinsmallvesseldiseasethepreserverandomizedclinicaltrial