Cargando…
Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a very common disease, especially among the elderly. Various drugs’ preventive effects against pneumonia have been reported. The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is used to prevent pneumonia, but the robustness of its efficacy is unclear. This review estimates the effectiveness...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5 |
_version_ | 1783311959274291200 |
---|---|
author | Nakashima, Hirotaka Watanabe, Kazuhisa Umegaki, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yusuke Kuzuya, Masafumi |
author_facet | Nakashima, Hirotaka Watanabe, Kazuhisa Umegaki, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yusuke Kuzuya, Masafumi |
author_sort | Nakashima, Hirotaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a very common disease, especially among the elderly. Various drugs’ preventive effects against pneumonia have been reported. The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is used to prevent pneumonia, but the robustness of its efficacy is unclear. This review estimates the effectiveness of cilostazol for preventing pneumonia in elderly individuals. METHODS: The following databases were searched from the earliest record to January 2016, without language restriction (the secondary search was conducted on February 2017): MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web. Studies were included if they were published randomized controlled trials investigating the preventive effect of cilostazol on pneumonia in the elderly. The outcome was the incidence of pneumonia. RESULTS: Two trials were identified that met the search criteria (1423 participants). Both trials compared cilostazol with no antiplatelet in patients with a history of cerebral infarction. A meta-analysis was not performed because of the small number of trials and the heterogeneity of the data. Both trials suggested that cilostazol reduced the incidence of pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.73 in one trial, RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06–0.69 in the other) and the recurrence of cerebral infarction (0.43; 0.21–0.90, 0.53; 0.34–0.81, respectively). The quality of evidence provided by the trials was very low, mainly because of the high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw conclusions on the basis of two trials. Moreover, in the two trials, cilostazol could have reduced the incidence of pneumonia via a reduction of the recurrence of cerebral infarction, which suggests that other antiplatelets could also have the same effects. Stronger evidence is required from large trials assessing the effectiveness of cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42016036724). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5885313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58853132018-04-09 Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review Nakashima, Hirotaka Watanabe, Kazuhisa Umegaki, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yusuke Kuzuya, Masafumi Pneumonia (Nathan) Review BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a very common disease, especially among the elderly. Various drugs’ preventive effects against pneumonia have been reported. The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is used to prevent pneumonia, but the robustness of its efficacy is unclear. This review estimates the effectiveness of cilostazol for preventing pneumonia in elderly individuals. METHODS: The following databases were searched from the earliest record to January 2016, without language restriction (the secondary search was conducted on February 2017): MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web. Studies were included if they were published randomized controlled trials investigating the preventive effect of cilostazol on pneumonia in the elderly. The outcome was the incidence of pneumonia. RESULTS: Two trials were identified that met the search criteria (1423 participants). Both trials compared cilostazol with no antiplatelet in patients with a history of cerebral infarction. A meta-analysis was not performed because of the small number of trials and the heterogeneity of the data. Both trials suggested that cilostazol reduced the incidence of pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.73 in one trial, RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06–0.69 in the other) and the recurrence of cerebral infarction (0.43; 0.21–0.90, 0.53; 0.34–0.81, respectively). The quality of evidence provided by the trials was very low, mainly because of the high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to draw conclusions on the basis of two trials. Moreover, in the two trials, cilostazol could have reduced the incidence of pneumonia via a reduction of the recurrence of cerebral infarction, which suggests that other antiplatelets could also have the same effects. Stronger evidence is required from large trials assessing the effectiveness of cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42016036724). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5885313/ /pubmed/29632801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Nakashima, Hirotaka Watanabe, Kazuhisa Umegaki, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yusuke Kuzuya, Masafumi Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
title | Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
title_full | Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
title_short | Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
title_sort | cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29632801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakashimahirotaka cilostazolforthepreventionofpneumoniaasystematicreview AT watanabekazuhisa cilostazolforthepreventionofpneumoniaasystematicreview AT umegakihiroyuki cilostazolforthepreventionofpneumoniaasystematicreview AT suzukiyusuke cilostazolforthepreventionofpneumoniaasystematicreview AT kuzuyamasafumi cilostazolforthepreventionofpneumoniaasystematicreview |